General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Article] Stunning Fossils Reveal First Humans to Leave Africa

Started by Robert Karl Sto · · Last activity · 2 posts · 655 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 December 2003
Last activity
30 December 2003
Original author
Robert Karl Sto
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
655
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Stranger in a New Land Stunning finds in the Republic of Georgia upend long-standing ideas about the
    first hominids to journey out of Africa By Kate Wong

    We shall not cease from exploration And the end of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we
    started And know the place for the first time. --T. S. Eliot, Four Quartets: "Little Gidding"

    In an age of spacecraft and deep-sea submersibles, we take it for granted that humans are intrepid
    explorers. Yet from an evolutionary perspective, the propensity to colonize is one of the
    distinguishing characteristics of our kind: no other primate has ever ranged so far and wide. Humans
    have not always been such cosmopolitan creatures, however. For most of the seven million years or so
    over which hominids have been evolving, they remained within the confines of their birthplace,
    Africa. But at some point, our ancestors began pushing out of the motherland, marking the start of a
    new chapter in our family history.

    It was, until recently, a chapter the fossil record had kept rather hidden from view. Based on the
    available evidence--a handful of human fossils from sites in China and Java--most
    paleoanthropologists concluded that the first intercontinental traveling was undertaken by an early
    member of our genus known as [censored] erectus starting little more than a million years ago. Long of
    limb and large of brain, H. erectus had just the sort of stride and smarts befitting a trailblazer.
    Earlier hominids, H. habilis and the australopithecines among them, were mostly small-bodied, small-
    brained creatures, not much bigger than a modern chimpanzee. The H. erectus build, in contrast,
    presaged modern human body proportions.

    Curiously, though, the first representatives of H. erectus in Africa, a group sometimes referred to
    as H. ergaster, had emerged as early as 1.9 million years ago. Why the lengthy departure delay? In
    explanation, researchers proposed that it was not until the advent of hand axes and other
    symmetrically shaped, standardized stone tools (a sophisticated technological culture known as the
    Acheulean) that H. erectus could penetrate the northern latitudes. Exactly what, if anything, these
    implements could accomplish that the simple Oldowan flakes, choppers and scrapers that preceded them
    could not is unknown, although perhaps they conferred a better means of butchering. In any event,
    the oldest accepted traces of humans outside Africa were Acheulean stone tools from a site called
    'Ubeidiya in Israel.

    Brawny, brainy, armed with cutting-edge technology--this was the hominid hero Hollywood would have
    cast in the role, a picture-perfect pioneer. Too perfect, it turns out. Over the past few years,
    researchers working at a site called Dmanisi in the Republic of Georgia have unearthed a trove of
    spectacularly well preserved human fossils, stone tools and animal remains dated to around 1.75
    million years ago--nearly half a million years older than the 'Ubeidiya remains. It is by
    paleoanthropological standards an embarrassment of riches. No other early [censored] site in the world has
    yielded such a bounty of bones, presenting scientists with an unprecedented opportunity to peer into
    the life and times of our hominid forebears. The discoveries have already proved revolutionary: the
    Georgian hominids are far more primitive in both anatomy and technology than expected, leaving
    experts wondering not only why early humans first ventured out of Africa but how.

    Read the rest (3 more pages) at Scientific Amercian.com tinyurl.comrt5s

    --
    Kind Regards, Robert Karl Stonjek.

  2. << The discoveries have already proved revolutionary: the Georgian hominids are far more primitive
    in both anatomy and technology than expected, leaving experts wondering not only why early humans
    first ventured out of Africa but how. >>

    Interesting articles as always.

    I would add this comment. I doubt whether the first explorers outside of Africa would be those that
    are the top dogs in their present location. I doubt a clan king would say ' I have it too good here,
    I'm giving it up to explore the North's bad weather. Thus I think you have a sort of diversifying
    selection where small groups are diverging from the main groups. For some reason these travelers
    felt that anything they faced out of Africa was better than what they faced in Africa. That may well
    be a clue to these travellers behavior, etc. Just a thought.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.