Tim Tyler <[email hidden]> wrote in
:"]news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:Don Wiss <donwiss@no_spam.com> wrote or quoted:
Quoted message said:It was pointed out on the PaleoFood mailing list that the reason human females have breasts is
because we have flat faces. And because we are the only mammals with flat faces, we are the only
mammals with protruding breasts. So the question becomes why do we have flat faces?
Quoted message said:probably somewhat along the lines envisaged by Desmond Morris.
Face shape has practically nothing to do with it.
I think you are right, but to give the question its due:
The possibilities are (1) that flat faces and protruding breasts are unrelated - an example of a
mammal with a flat face and non-protruding breasts would be good evidence. Any takers? (Elephants
don't have flat faces, but might still count as a counter-example)(And how flat is flat - walruses
and capybara are still pretty flat-faced from the standpoint of breastfeeding)
(2) that we developed protruding breasts for the reason suggested by Tim, and that flat faces then
could develop, and did so for other reasons.
(3) that the sequence was as posited by the question - we developed flat faces, and the protruding
breasts are a response.
I think we know when flat faces developed - what I don't know is if the paleontological record is
sufficient to define when protruding breasts developed.
Yours,
Bill Morse