Quoted post said:Originally Posted by o1silver4 [IMG]/img/forum/go_quote.gif[/IMG]
they where ELITES, And i would just like to add the my SUPER SIX was fitted with SHIMANO R500 wheelset when i bought the bike. And even with those wheels, the stiffness and responsiveness of the bike was still amazing. And i am starting to think that its all have to do with the frame of the bike. Although wheels do play apart, but i am starting to think jugging from my latest experience that it all starts with the frame. design, material etc. And yes corvette is indeed chevy, but a chevy thats in a total different league. especially a ZR1 with a LS9 which is really a 427 with a SUPERCHARGER. Race one of these with my GIXXER 1000 and this thing was on my tail all the way to 160mph. wouldn't u agree thats a beast of chevy? may be a JAMIS XENITH RACE would be more of a comparison to the SUPER SIX, But definitely not the VENTURA SPORT which was my previous bike and decent bike has well.
Okay ... thanks for clarifying the situation with your wheelsets.
Of course, I can't disagree about straight line performance of either your Suzuki or the Vette ...
BTW. Is there still a Vette with a small block engine?
- Wouldn't a small block engine Vette actually be preferred by a performance oriented driver, particularly if someone wanted to race Formula 7 (Is that the correct category OR is Formula 7 the GTO category? I'm too old to remember!) which I think is still (?!?) restricted to a displacement of 5 liters ... OR, is that also (down to?) 3 liters?!?
Regardless, 'I' have to presume that the Vette's chassis still provides optimal handling with a lighter engine weight no matter how well it has been tuned for the power & weight of a 427 engine.
BTW2. While it is probably worthwhile to TEST RIDE a bike with SRAM RED components, when you are truly ready for an upgrade in your shifters then you really should compare SRAM's offerings with a bike which has Campagnolo shifters ... particularly, now, since the Campagnolo's 11-speed Cassettes now appear to have Cogs whose tooth profile more closely resembles the tooth profile on Shimano Cassettes ...
- my experience, FWIW, is that Campagnolo shifters mated to an otherwise Shimano drivetrain just shift better -- I'm not just talking about shifting when the on the Flat, but about the shifting when going UPHILL & shifting while the drivetrain is under load & without going through any machinations of needing to unweight the drivetrain, etc. ...
- and, AFAIK, the Campagnolo-Shimano combination is only matched by the gushing reviews about how well the various reviewers feel that Campagnolo & Shimano electronic shifters function
- FWIW. IMO, Shimano's mechanical derailleurs are superior ... that's not to say that Campagnolo's rear derailleurs may not be as good, but the mid-range Shimano rear derailleurs are functionally as good as their best, and the mid-range Campagnolo rear derailleurs have a higher starting price point
- I'm not convinced that Campagnolo's front derailleurs are as good as Shimano's, yet, but I haven't tested the newest Record (and, presumably Chorus) front derailleurs ... a quick test with an Athena front derailleur was under whelming; but, I'll try to give THAT front derailleur another go at some point in the future.
In other words, that's a long way of saying that smoother-and-more-efficient shifting is the suggested upgrade which is most economically achievable by simply installing a pair of Campagnolo shifters to your current bike(s).