General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

accuracy of fingerprick test for H. Pylori (oct)

Started by Kilroy Bass · · Last activity · 3 posts · 639 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
29 December 2003
Last activity
29 December 2003
Original author
Kilroy Bass
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
639
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I was tested for H. Pylori, but the results came in negative, meaning I didn't have the H. Pylori.
    This was done through a fingerprick method, though. It took about 5 minutes for results to show. Is
    the fingerprick method accurate?

    I am showing symptoms of acid reflux (GERD) and since I'm showing no signs of having H. Pylori,
    would like to know what the next step should be.

  2. Hey dude,

    usually a blood test is done to diagnose H. Pylori, so it makes since that a finger [censored] would
    work. But i don't know how accurate it is.

    Usually if you are having a prob with acid reflux and the usual drinking water and putting the head
    of your bed up at night doesn't work, then the DR orders something like Reglan.

    One theory is that the opening into the stomach relaxes and allows the stomach fluid to go out.
    Reglan the way i understand it, is supposed to help keep that opening from opening when it's
    supposed to be closed. While Zantac on the other hand is supposed to work more on an antacid basis.

    --
    ~Ray~
    "Kilroy Bass" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was tested for H. Pylori, but the results came in negative, meaning
    I didn't have the H. Pylori. This was done through a fingerprick
    method, though. It took about 5 minutes for results to show. Is the
    fingerprick method accurate?

    I am showing symptoms of acid reflux (GERD) and since I'm showing no
    signs of having H. Pylori, would like to know what the next step
    should be.

  3. its nearly as accurate as a urea breath test done on GI endoscopy somewhere around 90%+

    "Kilroy Bass" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I was tested for H. Pylori, but the results came in negative, meaning I didn't have the H. Pylori.
    This was done through a fingerprick method, though. It took about 5 minutes for results to show.
    Is the fingerprick method accurate?

    I am showing symptoms of acid reflux (GERD) and since I'm showing no signs of having H. Pylori,
    would like to know what the next step should be.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.