ride4him said:I guess what i meant was that Trek carbon is not quite as strong as say Specialized or Giant. I have this opinion from talking to numerous bike industry folks and the riders who own them. That being said carbon from any manufacturer is weak if it is involved in a crash. It is very strong under normal riding but it does not take a beating. I myself have ruined a carbon fiber fork when I hit a wet wooden bridge and had my bike slide out from under me. But this incident has not kept me from riding carbon fiber.
I think you have to be careful with assumptions like these, especially if you base your opinion on what industry folks say. As an example, Mavic apparently still thinks the R-SYS was a good design. 🙄 Also, industry folks don't necessarily base their views on fact and may accidentally or purposefully disseminate bad info.
As for Trek's trouble's or whether or not they even have any. I haven't heard much in any forums, be the forumites racers or regular folk. That's not to say they haven't had a frame or two fail, but no manufacturing process is perfect. Also, it's not uncommon for a bike owner to prevaricate a bit when presenting broken bits to a dealer or company rep to insure they get a warranty claim or summat.
My intent isn't to argue with you but rather to say to new riders that there are very few bad frames on the market, be they Ti, Al, Steel, Mg, or CF. Therefore a new rider should keep their focus on fit, wow factor, and price.