UK and Europe · Public discussion

Safety priority

Started by Clive George · · Last activity · 15 posts · 1,088 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
24 June 2008
Last activity
26 June 2008
Original author
Clive George
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,088
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My wife has just reported seeing a wonderfully safety-conscious cyclist in
    Bradford. Helmet, hi-viz jacket, sam-browne belt, ankle and wrist bands,
    riding in the cycle-lane. Except he was riding the wrong way...

    cheers,
    clive

  2. Clive George said:

    My wife has just reported seeing a wonderfully safety-conscious
    cyclist in Bradford. Helmet, hi-viz jacket, sam-browne belt, ankle
    and wrist bands, riding in the cycle-lane. Except he was riding the
    wrong way...
    cheers,
    clive

    I would say that he was very sensibly dressed for such an activity, you
    wouldn't want to do that without taking every precaution.

    A couple of weeks ago I saw a young lad riding towards me on an on-road
    cycle lane and when I shouted that he was going the wrong way he looked
    genuinely puzzled. Maybe that was his usual expression, I don't know.

    Seriously though, I am sure that the provision of cycling "facilities" and
    the ubiquity of "off-road" BSOs for the younger end of the market means that
    now there's a generation who have never even thought of a bicycle as a road
    going vehicle.

    --

    Nigel

  3. On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:25:04 +0100, "Nigel Randell"

    nigel_randell@_1.web said:

    Seriously though, I am sure that the provision of cycling "facilities" and
    the ubiquity of "off-road" BSOs for the younger end of the market means that
    now there's a generation who have never even thought of a bicycle as a road
    going vehicle.

    The increase in petrol prices seems to be causing far more "cyclists"
    to appear who seem to not only think they can ride on the pavement,
    but do so *in Milton Keynes*, even in cases where there is a Redway on
    the other side of the road which is wide enough for them to cycle on,
    being intended for that very purpose.

    The Redways are no secret in MK, and they are all helpfully red. So I
    can only conclude that such people are lazy or just don't give a
    stuff.

    Neil

    --
    Neil Williams
    Put my first name before the at to reply.

  4. "Neil Williams" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:25:04 +0100, "Nigel Randell"

    nigel_randell@_1.web said:

    Seriously though, I am sure that the provision of cycling "facilities" and
    the ubiquity of "off-road" BSOs for the younger end of the market means
    that
    now there's a generation who have never even thought of a bicycle as a
    road
    going vehicle.

    The increase in petrol prices seems to be causing far more "cyclists"
    to appear who seem to not only think they can ride on the pavement,
    but do so *in Milton Keynes*, even in cases where there is a Redway on
    the other side of the road which is wide enough for them to cycle on,
    being intended for that very purpose.

    The Redways are no secret in MK, and they are all helpfully red. So I
    can only conclude that such people are lazy or just don't give a
    stuff.

    Or perhaps they've read John Franklin's report on the Redways and are
    sensible enough not to go near them.

  5. "Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My wife has just reported seeing a wonderfully safety-conscious cyclist in
    Bradford. Helmet, hi-viz jacket, sam-browne belt, ankle and wrist bands,
    riding in the cycle-lane. Except he was riding the wrong way...

    cheers,
    clive

    Could it be that he wasn't aware that the cycle lane runs with the flow of
    traffic.

    Lets face it there are some that run against - I can think of one in
    Bradford City Centre near City Hall that does, there are some which are to
    be used in both directions - so if someone has recently turned to or
    returned to riding a bike they may not be aware especially if that
    particular road only has a cycle lane on one side of it.

    Dave

  6. On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:00:10 +0100 someone who may be "Dave"
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Could it be that he wasn't aware that the cycle lane runs with the flow of
    traffic.

    Lets face it there are some that run against - I can think of one in
    Bradford City Centre near City Hall that does, there are some which are to
    be used in both directions - so if someone has recently turned to or
    returned to riding a bike they may not be aware especially if that
    particular road only has a cycle lane on one side of it.

    I imagine there are some who are so fixated on cycle lanes that if
    there is one on only one side of the road they will use it. When it
    ends they probably continue on the pavement, as roads are only for
    motor vehicles. Conditioning.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh
    I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

  7. On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:00:10 +0100

    Dave said:


    "Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My wife has just reported seeing a wonderfully safety-conscious
    cyclist in Bradford. Helmet, hi-viz jacket, sam-browne belt, ankle
    and wrist bands, riding in the cycle-lane. Except he was riding the
    wrong way...

    cheers,
    clive

    Could it be that he wasn't aware that the cycle lane runs with the
    flow of traffic.

    Lets face it there are some that run against - I can think of one in
    Bradford City Centre near City Hall that does, there are some which
    are to be used in both directions - so if someone has recently turned
    to or returned to riding a bike they may not be aware especially if
    that particular road only has a cycle lane on one side of it.


    He probably thinks that he's required to use it, too.

  8. "David Hansen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:00:10 +0100 someone who may be "Dave"
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Could it be that he wasn't aware that the cycle lane runs with the flow of
    traffic.

    Lets face it there are some that run against - I can think of one in
    Bradford City Centre near City Hall that does, there are some which are to
    be used in both directions - so if someone has recently turned to or
    returned to riding a bike they may not be aware especially if that
    particular road only has a cycle lane on one side of it.

    I imagine there are some who are so fixated on cycle lanes that if
    there is one on only one side of the road they will use it. When it
    ends they probably continue on the pavement, as roads are only for
    motor vehicles. Conditioning.

    That is basically what I was getting at.

    If you were new to all this and had gone out to buy gear that makes you
    stand out and had read the highway code that indicates that if there are
    cycle lanes you should consider using them - he went out and used it.

    Not seen the highway code but does it indicate that the cycle lane should
    only be used in a certain direction if it is at the edge and part of the
    highway. Iwas led led to believe that it didn't make that distinction -
    perhaps some common sense ??

    Dave

  9. "Dave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    My wife has just reported seeing a wonderfully safety-conscious cyclist
    in Bradford. Helmet, hi-viz jacket, sam-browne belt, ankle and wrist
    bands, riding in the cycle-lane. Except he was riding the wrong way...

    Could it be that he wasn't aware that the cycle lane runs with the flow of
    traffic.

    Lets face it there are some that run against - I can think of one in
    Bradford City Centre near City Hall that does, there are some which are to
    be used in both directions - so if someone has recently turned to or
    returned to riding a bike they may not be aware especially if that
    particular road only has a cycle lane on one side of it.

    Is the one you're thinking of a contraflow cycle-lane, ie the other way down
    a one-way street?

    Got a street name for a cycle lane which is part of the same general tarmac
    as the road and is intended to be used both ways? I've never seen one like
    that.

    FWIW it was on the Keighley Road, A650, just before it becomes Manningham
    Lane.

    I did once meet a cyclist on Downing Street in Cambridge dutifully coming
    the wrong way up the contraflow cycle lane. I mentioned to them that they
    should be on the other lane, but they insisted they should be in the bike
    lane. I think I got bored arguing then...

    (I did meet another one - I bet they didn't take the hint that we were both
    probably going the wrong side of keep-left bollards at the time indicated
    that perhaps one of us ought to have chosen a more appropriate initial
    position...)

    cheers,
    clive

  10. On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:22:13 +0100 someone who may be "Dave"
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Not seen the highway code

    It used to be easily available at <www.highwaycode.gov.uk>. Then
    some idiot decided that there should be one "portal". I'm sure most
    of us can picture the sort of idiot concerned.

    It's now at
    <http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTransport/Highwaycode/index.htm>.

    Quoted message said:

    but does it indicate that the cycle lane should
    only be used in a certain direction if it is at the edge and part of the
    highway. Iwas led led to believe that it didn't make that distinction -
    perhaps some common sense ??

    I suggest you read it yourself, rather then asking to be spoon fed
    elementary information.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh
    I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

  11. On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 11:17:18 +0100 someone who may be Rob Morley
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Lets face it there are some that run against - I can think of one in
    Bradford City Centre near City Hall that does, there are some which
    are to be used in both directions - so if someone has recently turned
    to or returned to riding a bike they may not be aware especially if
    that particular road only has a cycle lane on one side of it.


    He probably thinks that he's required to use it, too.

    The police in Telford and one particular magistrate would probably
    try and persecute anyone who didn't use it.

    --
    David Hansen, Edinburgh
    I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
    http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54

  12. Clive George said:

    My wife has just reported seeing a wonderfully safety-conscious cyclist in
    Bradford. Helmet, hi-viz jacket, sam-browne belt, ankle and wrist bands,
    riding in the cycle-lane. Except he was riding the wrong way...

    cheers,
    clive

    i've seen that a few times, infact should you go to kingston and loiter
    on Richmound Road out side Evans bikes you'll see plenty ride the wrong
    way down the cycle lane.

    roger
    --
    www.rogermerriman.com

  13. Dave said:


    "David Hansen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:00:10 +0100 someone who may be "Dave"
    <[email hidden]> wrote this:-

    Quoted message said:

    Could it be that he wasn't aware that the cycle lane runs with the flow of
    traffic.

    Lets face it there are some that run against - I can think of one in
    Bradford City Centre near City Hall that does, there are some which are to
    be used in both directions - so if someone has recently turned to or
    returned to riding a bike they may not be aware especially if that
    particular road only has a cycle lane on one side of it.

    I imagine there are some who are so fixated on cycle lanes that if
    there is one on only one side of the road they will use it. When it
    ends they probably continue on the pavement, as roads are only for
    motor vehicles. Conditioning.

    That is basically what I was getting at.

    If you were new to all this and had gone out to buy gear that makes you
    stand out and had read the highway code that indicates that if there are
    cycle lanes you should consider using them - he went out and used it.

    Not seen the highway code but does it indicate that the cycle lane should
    only be used in a certain direction if it is at the edge and part of the
    highway. Iwas led led to believe that it didn't make that distinction -
    perhaps some common sense ??

    Are you a driver or road user? If so I would be very concerned that
    you have "not seen the highway code".

    --
    (\__/) M.
    (='.'=) Owing to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and
    ("😉_("😉 their inaction to the problem. I am blocking most articles
    posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by
    everyone you will need use a different method of posting.
    See http://improve-usenet.org

  14. "Mark" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    SNIP

    Quoted message said:

    Are you a driver or road user? If so I would be very concerned that
    you have "not seen the highway code".

    I haven't been a motor vehicle user for many years. I did have the highway
    code then. I am aware that over the years some things have changed with each
    publication and have seen certain things that have.

    As someone who rides a bike on the road and a pedestrian I have to admit
    that I have'nt read the highway code for a long time and I have only seen
    the new one in WHS.

    I guess that most of the population will not use or read the highway code
    and when they do it will generally to help them through the driving test.

    Most of the updates are brought to peoples attention through the press and
    even then you only have to look at the actions of some road users to see
    that they haven't got a clue.

    From a cyclists point of view the little bit that relates to cycles can be
    seen online and most of that has not changed over the years.

    I cannot quote passages from the highway code however and it is that which I
    was trying to say with my comment as I had not read the new rules that
    closely.

    Dave

  15. Clive George said:

    I did once meet a cyclist on Downing Street in Cambridge dutifully coming
    the wrong way up the contraflow cycle lane. I mentioned to them that they
    should be on the other lane, but they insisted they should be in the bike
    lane. I think I got bored arguing then...

    (I did meet another one - I bet they didn't take the hint that we were both
    probably going the wrong side of keep-left bollards at the time indicated
    that perhaps one of us ought to have chosen a more appropriate initial
    position...)

    Yeah I was nearly in collision with another cyclist last week because
    of his compulsion to use a contraflow cycle lane going the opposite
    way from the way we were cycling. I was just overtaking him as he
    pulled across the road to use the lane, despite the road being only
    100 metres long and empty of all other traffic.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.