In article <[email hidden]>,
Tom Kunich' cyclintom@yahoo. com said:I've not used a lot of clipless systems but here's my opinion:
Look clipless - I've used these a great deal over 15 years. Strengths: they
provide a nice strong connection to the bike with a clear feel when you're
disconnected. Weaknesses: The cleats do not wear well.
Quoted message said:Shimano SPD - They just don't seem to provide a good connection in the one's
I've used. I clip out all the time when I'm just riding along.
Quoted message said:Crank Bros X-pedals: These are the cheapest and simplest of the pedal
systems I've used. They work well as long as everything is new. Strengths:
Simplicity. Lightness. Good price. Weaknesses: The cleat wears quite
rapidly - less than 1500 miles and you start bouncing out of the pedal. The
wear pattern of the is such that you would easily click out if your heal
turned inward while riding. While new they worked fine so it definitely is a
wear problem. Supposedly they have a newer and longer lasting cleat that
uses a different metal for the cleats. Hopefully this will fix that problem.
Another minor problem is that the X-pedals are a bit difficult to ride
without proper shoes. If you want to run up to the corner to mail a letter
or ride a couple of blocks to the grocery for something you have to put on
cycling shoes.
OK - your turn to add pedals or to add or criticize my entries.
Hardly a coincidence given their popularity, but these are also the
three systems I have tried.
I started on SPDs, and they worked fine for me in almost all
circumstances. I still recommend them (and compatible clones) to anyone
as the default clipless choice, if only due to cost and availability.
I tried Looks next, mainly because I got some cleats and shoes cheap.
They were fine. I eventually decided that they had no advantages for me
over SPDs, and I couldn't walk in them, and the cleats wear fast. Since
I sometimes ride bikes to places and dismount at my destination, I felt
this was a huge pain.
Crank Brothers: first, I've tried two of the platformed pedals (Candy
and Smarty) as well as one of the Egg Beater types. The Candy/Smarty
design is much easier to ride on, to the extent that I have no qualms
about treating them as flat pedals and riding those bikes in normal
shoes. The Egg Beater-equipped bike takes a bit of care, and I find that
missing pedal entry on the Egg Beater can be consequential (as in, foot
rolls off pedal) in a way that is rare in other pedals. Also, Crank Bros
pedals have a rep for wearing shoe soles, which seems largely alleviated
by their plastic (and now metal) inserts that are meant to fit between
cleat and shoe.
It shouldn't matter, but when my SPD-using father caught sight of my Egg
Beaters, he was fascinated. The aesthetics of that pedal are very high.
Aside from those provisos, Crank Brothers pedals are, in my opinion,
very similar to SPDs, and I wouldn't recommend changing to them except
for one thing: I race cyclocross.
CX demands pedals where you ride through mud, stomp your feet through
mud, then jump on the pedals and get instant mud clearance and return to
normal operation. SPDs balk at this unreasonable treatment. Crank
Brothers pedals (and, apparently, Time ATACs) do not.
This is, in my opinion, an extraordinary requirement for a pedal.
However, I saw Peter disparaging walkable shoes down-thread, and I think
that's wildly misguided. The more I use walkable shoes, the more I like
walkable shoes, and the more I use my bikes in circumstances where
unwalkable shoes would be a pain. In short, I do a fair bit of
multi-modal commuting, including occasionally taking light rail part way
to local bike races, or little shopping trips, or whatever.
Walkable shoes mean these sorts of things are no-brainers: even my
stiff-soled Adidas Marathons are not too bad. In practice, I find that
just about the time when I think it would be too far to walk in walkable
shoes, it turns out I can get back on my bike and ride there. On the
other hand, unwalkable shoes mean that every staircase or smooth surface
between me and my destination is a terror.
On at least one occassion, walkable shoes even made my club ride easier:
a tiny chunk of our ride was closed to road traffic by some large
concrete barriers. The rest of the riders looked on in horror as I
jumped up onto a barrier carrying my bike and then hopped off on the
other side.
It's only in retrospect that I realized my compatriots could hardly
attempt same.
--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls."
"In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them."