Does anybody here know the exact differences between the original Shimano Dura-Ace WH7700 clincher wheelset (ca. 2003 or so) and the "Sweet 16" tandem wheelset that they developed in conjunction with Santana?
Does anybody here know the exact differences between the original Shimano Dura-Ace WH7700 clincher wheelset (ca. 2003 or so) and the "Sweet 16" tandem wheelset that they developed in conjunction with Santana?
I have a pair of the old WH7700's, and some good friends have a pair of the Sweet-16 tandem wheels. The most obvious difference is the spoke thickness, also, the disc-brake option and 160 mm spacing of the rear. According to a Santana service update, Sweet-16 rim weight was reduced on wheels built after Aug 2005. Santana claims stronger rims and axles, fully-symmetrical flange placement and a stronger freehub mechanism, as well as thicker spokes, compared to the WH7700.
Does anybody here know the exact differences between the original Shimano Dura-Ace WH7700 clincher wheelset (ca. 2003 or so) and the "Sweet 16" tandem wheelset that they developed in conjunction with Santana?
I have a pair of the old WH7700's, and some good friends have a pair of the Sweet-16 tandem wheels. The most obvious difference is the spoke thickness, also, the disc-brake option and 160 mm spacing of the rear. According to a Santana service update, Sweet-16 rim weight was reduced on wheels built after Aug 2005. Santana claims stronger rims and axles, fully-symmetrical flange placement and a stronger freehub mechanism, as well as thicker spokes, compared to the WH7700.
Dave Lehnen
good info. as an owner of a pair of WH7700's, i'd have been very surprised to learn the same rim, spokes, hub, etc. were on a tandem wheel.