Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Shimano wheels: WH7700 vs. tandem "Sweet 16"?

Started by Andy Coggan · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,705 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
9 June 2008
Last activity
10 June 2008
Original author
Andy Coggan
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,705
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Does anybody here know the exact differences between the original
    Shimano Dura-Ace WH7700 clincher wheelset (ca. 2003 or so) and the
    "Sweet 16" tandem wheelset that they developed in conjunction with
    Santana?

    http://www.precisiontandems.com/cat_pics/whshimano16.jpg

    The latter is spaced at 160 mm, but other than that they appear to be
    essentially the same?

    I'll try this Q on some other lists as well...

    Andy Coggan

  2. Andy Coggan said:

    Does anybody here know the exact differences between the original
    Shimano Dura-Ace WH7700 clincher wheelset (ca. 2003 or so) and the
    "Sweet 16" tandem wheelset that they developed in conjunction with
    Santana?

    http://www.precisiontandems.com/cat_pics/whshimano16.jpg

    The latter is spaced at 160 mm, but other than that they appear to be
    essentially the same?

    I'll try this Q on some other lists as well...

    Andy Coggan

    Santana's website has some information:
    http://santanatandem.com/Parts/Shimano07.html

    I have a pair of the old WH7700's, and some good friends have a pair of
    the Sweet-16 tandem wheels. The most obvious difference is the spoke
    thickness, also, the disc-brake option and 160 mm spacing of the rear.
    According to a Santana service update, Sweet-16 rim weight was reduced
    on wheels built after Aug 2005. Santana claims stronger rims and axles,
    fully-symmetrical flange placement and a stronger freehub mechanism, as
    well as thicker spokes, compared to the WH7700.

    Dave Lehnen

  3. Dave Lehnen said:
    Andy Coggan said:

    Does anybody here know the exact differences between the original
    Shimano Dura-Ace WH7700 clincher wheelset (ca. 2003 or so) and the
    "Sweet 16" tandem wheelset that they developed in conjunction with
    Santana?

    http://www.precisiontandems.com/cat_pics/whshimano16.jpg

    The latter is spaced at 160 mm, but other than that they appear to be
    essentially the same?

    I'll try this Q on some other lists as well...

    Andy Coggan

    Santana's website has some information:
    http://santanatandem.com/Parts/Shimano07.html

    I have a pair of the old WH7700's, and some good friends have a pair of
    the Sweet-16 tandem wheels. The most obvious difference is the spoke
    thickness, also, the disc-brake option and 160 mm spacing of the rear.
    According to a Santana service update, Sweet-16 rim weight was reduced
    on wheels built after Aug 2005. Santana claims stronger rims and axles,
    fully-symmetrical flange placement and a stronger freehub mechanism, as
    well as thicker spokes, compared to the WH7700.

    Dave Lehnen

    good info. as an owner of a pair of WH7700's, i'd have been very
    surprised to learn the same rim, spokes, hub, etc. were on a tandem wheel.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.