In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from the road.
Ooh, i've got a brilliant one on my camera, must send it in soon. It's part of a two-way segregated cycle lane, and looks a bit like this (where = is a kerb and - is a painted line):
Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends two opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't see it doing so in practice.
FFS, do the designers of these monstrosities have anything more than an amoeba for a brain?!! AAAARRGGGGHH!!
Rant over. Normal service will now be resumed.
not until after the legal branch of the Association for the Advancement of Amoebae has sued you for defamation, it won't...
Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/
In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from the road. -- Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"
It's an obvious attempt to inject 'xtreme' into urban cycling, when out riding your BMX you can now hop up onto the rail, grind and continue, sweet!
Continue for 10 yards until you have to stop and the give way ( just visible at the top), just how much use do they think this bit of white paint lunacy will get?
Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends two opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't see it doing so in practice.
If you enjoy this then come for a ride around Wrexham some time - scalextric style crossovers on shared use paths (i.e. swapping the pedestrian and the cyclists' sides) seem to be the speciality around here.
One farcility has 3 of them in about 400m. Must take a photo of it and send it in....
-- Danny Colyer <http://www.redpedals.co.uk> Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often "The plural of anecdote is not data" - Frank Kotsonis
That is a classic. The council went to the expense of dropping the kerb, then placed the barrier exactly in the middle.
What is really worrying is that whenever I see a new FotM, I am nearly always reminded of a similar farcility near me.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from the road.
Ooh, i've got a brilliant one on my camera, must send it in soon. It's part of a two-way segregated cycle lane, and looks a bit like this (where = is a kerb and - is a painted line):
Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends two opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't see it doing so in practice.
There is a shared use path near me where the cyclist half jumps from the left side, to the right in a short distance, right on a blind corner.
In news:[email hidden], Martin <[email hidden]> tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us:
Quoted message said:
There is a shared use path near me where the cyclist half jumps from the left side, to the right in a short distance, right on a blind corner.
The one along the east side of the Tottenham one-way system does this, with the added bonus of doing so at the entrance to one of the industrial units. Thus one has to look out not only for errant peds and cyclists, but also for vehicles entering and exiting said industrial unit. Not to mention having to dodge round the plodmobiles frequently parked smack in the middle of the path while the filth nick people for driving in the bus lane.
-- Dave Larrington <http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk> Although the hippopotamus hath no sting in its tail, the wise man would rather be seated upon the back of a bee.
Yes, it changes from ride-on-the-left to ride-on-the right, and sends two opposing streams of traffic directly across one another. There is a yield mark on one of them, so it sort of works in principle, but i can't see it doing so in practice.
If you enjoy this then come for a ride around Wrexham some time - scalextric style crossovers on shared use paths (i.e. swapping the pedestrian and the cyclists' sides) seem to be the speciality around here.
One farcility has 3 of them in about 400m. Must take a photo of it and send it in....
There's a few "facilities" around here I could submit to FotM -- no, I tell a lie, it's all of them.
-- (\__/) M. (='.'=) Owing to the amount of spam posted via googlegroups and ("😉_("😉 their inaction to the problem. I am blocking most articles posted from there. If you wish your postings to be seen by everyone you will need use a different method of posting. See http://improve-usenet.org
In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from the road. -- Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"
It's an obvious attempt to inject 'xtreme' into urban cycling, when out riding your BMX you can now hop up onto the rail, grind and continue, sweet!
Continue for 10 yards until you have to stop and the give way ( just visible at the top), just how much use do they think this bit of white paint lunacy will get?
not a lot i think it's over the rise upto the railway bridge. i'm in the area today i'll have a look and see if i can take a wider angle shot. assume it's still there.
In both cases the barrier prevents you from riding onto the path from the road. -- Phil Cook looking north over the park to the "Westminster Gasworks"
It's an obvious attempt to inject 'xtreme' into urban cycling, when out riding your BMX you can now hop up onto the rail, grind and continue, sweet!
Continue for 10 yards until you have to stop and the give way ( just visible at the top), just how much use do they think this bit of white paint lunacy will get?