Discuss!! Question #1

ST said:

OK......... I am going out on a limb here with one of my deep-thought
philosophical questions..

If Gays are BORN that way, no chance of changing desires or thought patterns
regarding relationship preferences then WHY does (mostly from the same left
-leaning group that agrees with the above statement) the liberal-leaning
crowd ALSO disagree with complete incarceration of, what we call, pedophiles
and related perpetrators instead calling for, at great cost, treatment with
psycho therapists and doctors and allowing these (our legal term) pedophiles
2nd and 3rd chances at out innocent citizens/children??

What is worse than going from a sometimes 50/50 chance of actually being
right predicting weather on the TV news to actually predicting Global
Warming caused by man and we are gonna all die in 50 years??

How about.......... Being elitist enough to know what behaviors are
INGRAINED and a genetic predisposition for then knowing exactly what
behaviors, regarding sexual preference, that can be CURED and deserve
multiple chances by the same elite group?

Are you smartasses that smart enough to know where the line is?? And IF some
of you are gonna come back and say "It is all good UNLESS someone is
hurt/injured/violated!" I am still going to want to know where is the line,
regarding ANY sexual preference, between being born that way versus
individual decision? (free will)

This is your idea of "deep thought"?

/dave a

dave a said:

ST said:

OK......... I am going out on a limb here with one of my deep-thought
philosophical questions..

If Gays are BORN that way, no chance of changing desires or thought patterns
regarding relationship preferences then WHY does (mostly from the same left
-leaning group that agrees with the above statement) the liberal-leaning
crowd ALSO disagree with complete incarceration of, what we call, pedophiles
and related perpetrators instead calling for, at great cost, treatment with
psycho therapists and doctors and allowing these (our legal term) pedophiles
2nd and 3rd chances at out innocent citizens/children??

What is worse than going from a sometimes 50/50 chance of actually being
right predicting weather on the TV news to actually predicting Global
Warming caused by man and we are gonna all die in 50 years??

How about.......... Being elitist enough to know what behaviors are
INGRAINED and a genetic predisposition for then knowing exactly what
behaviors, regarding sexual preference, that can be CURED and deserve
multiple chances by the same elite group?

Are you smartasses that smart enough to know where the line is?? And IF some
of you are gonna come back and say "It is all good UNLESS someone is
hurt/injured/violated!" I am still going to want to know where is the line,
regarding ANY sexual preference, between being born that way versus
individual decision? (free will)

This is your idea of "deep thought"?

/dave a

Nice thinking mans reply......
I wanna hear from all the smartass scientists out there..

I read rbr via google groups and right now the "sponsored links" for
your posts include ads for "www.FatLoss4Idiots.com" and
"PassiveAgressive.Com/Anger."

On 4/19/08 7:51 PM, in article
[email hidden], "Robert

Chung said:

I read rbr via google groups and right now the "sponsored links" for
your posts include ads for "www.FatLoss4Idiots.com" and
"PassiveAgressive.Com/Anger."

Don't be an idiot.......
You know everytime you refresh the page those ads rotate.

I weigh 27lbs less than I did at this time last year. I did the 45+ masters
state crit race and finished in the pack last year at that weight. Better
than the half that did not finish... My body fat is less than 6% right now.

Have you ever been accused of taking steroids? Do you have a 31" waist? (at
182lbs) I have bigger arms than many others legs.. I have more visible veins
(low body fat for you dumbasses) than you jokers.

I ride a 91" fixed gear on our Saturday training rides here (40-70 riders)
and still open a can of whoopass on them.

You are gonna have to come up with some new smear material.......

In article <[email hidden]>,

dave a said:

ST said:

[hot air]

This is your idea of "deep thought"?

/dave a

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/5292/1189960203870cp7.jpg

(Please don't feed the troll.)

--
Mark Shroyer, http://markshroyer.com/contact/
I have joined others in blocking Google Groups due to excessive
spam. If you want more people to see your posts, you should use
another means of posting to Usenet. http://improve-usenet.org/

On 4/19/08 8:15 PM, in article
[email hidden], "Mark Shroyer"

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

dave a said:

ST said:

[hot air]

This is your idea of "deep thought"?

/dave a

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/5292/1189960203870cp7.jpg

(Please don't feed the troll.)

You guys are REALLY scared to voice an opinion on these subjects aren't
you.......

ST wrote:>

Quoted message said:

I weigh 27lbs less than I did at this time last year. I did the 45+ masters
state crit race and finished in the pack last year at that weight. Better
than the half that did not finish... My body fat is less than 6% right now.

Have you ever been accused of taking steroids? Do you have a 31" waist? (at
182lbs) I have bigger arms than many others legs.. I have more visible veins
(low body fat for you dumbasses) than you jokers.

But you're still as dumb as a tree stump.

ST said:

OK......... I am going out on a limb here with one of my deep-thought
philosophical questions..

If Gays are BORN that way, no chance of changing desires or thought patterns
regarding relationship preferences then WHY does (mostly from the same left
-leaning group that agrees with the above statement) the liberal-leaning
crowd ALSO disagree with complete incarceration of, what we call, pedophiles
and related perpetrators instead calling for, at great cost, treatment with
psycho therapists and doctors and allowing these (our legal term) pedophiles
2nd and 3rd chances at out innocent citizens/children??

What is worse than going from a sometimes 50/50 chance of actually being
right predicting weather on the TV news to actually predicting Global
Warming caused by man and we are gonna all die in 50 years??

How about.......... Being elitist enough to know what behaviors are
INGRAINED and a genetic predisposition for then knowing exactly what
behaviors, regarding sexual preference,  that can be CURED and deserve
multiple chances by the same elite group?

Are you smartasses that smart enough to know where the line is?? And IF some
of you are gonna come back and say "It is all good UNLESS someone is
hurt/injured/violated!" I am still going to want to know where is the line,
regarding ANY sexual preference, between being born that way versus
individual decision? (free will)

Adipose Stephen,

I was having difficulty understanding what point you
were making. Until I tried reading your post out loud in
the voice of Eric Cartman.

Ben

On 4/20/08 12:06 AM, in article [email hidden], "Kyle

Legate said:

ST wrote:>

Quoted message said:

I weigh 27lbs less than I did at this time last year. I did the 45+ masters
state crit race and finished in the pack last year at that weight. Better
than the half that did not finish... My body fat is less than 6% right now.

Have you ever been accused of taking steroids? Do you have a 31" waist? (at
182lbs) I have bigger arms than many others legs.. I have more visible veins
(low body fat for you dumbasses) than you jokers.

But you're still as dumb as a tree stump.

You are one of the worst jackasses out here for years.
Answer the f'ing question [censored]!

On 4/20/08 12:24 AM, in article
[email hidden],

Quoted post said:

ST said:

OK......... I am going out on a limb here with one of my deep-thought
philosophical questions..

If Gays are BORN that way, no chance of changing desires or thought patterns
regarding relationship preferences then WHY does (mostly from the same left
-leaning group that agrees with the above statement) the liberal-leaning
crowd ALSO disagree with complete incarceration of, what we call, pedophiles
and related perpetrators instead calling for, at great cost, treatment with
psycho therapists and doctors and allowing these (our legal term) pedophiles
2nd and 3rd chances at out innocent citizens/children??

What is worse than going from a sometimes 50/50 chance of actually being
right predicting weather on the TV news to actually predicting Global
Warming caused by man and we are gonna all die in 50 years??

How about.......... Being elitist enough to know what behaviors are
INGRAINED and a genetic predisposition for then knowing exactly what
behaviors, regarding sexual preference,  that can be CURED and deserve
multiple chances by the same elite group?

Are you smartasses that smart enough to know where the line is?? And IF some
of you are gonna come back and say "It is all good UNLESS someone is
hurt/injured/violated!" I am still going to want to know where is the line,
regarding ANY sexual preference, between being born that way versus
individual decision? (free will)

Adipose Stephen,

I was having difficulty understanding what point you
were making. Until I tried reading your post out loud in
the voice of Eric Cartman.

Ben

I finally got you progressive elitist assbags on the ropes...

I am gonna bet NONE of you EVER are going to actually answer EITHER ONE of
these questions.

I do not give an iota of [censored] what you want to post about me. If you do NOT
answer the question you are all nothing but bags of global warming hot air..

The ONLY stands you guys ever make are based on political correctness. NEVER
have I read any stand based on character or heart-felt moral beliefs.

This is it guys....... No funky homemade charts/graphs or Google searching
is going to replace an opinion based on actual beliefs. Just like when
religion is bashed as unnecessary and the root of all evil and violence in
history BUT when you find yourself in a life-or-death scenario ????

ST said:

OK......... I am going out on a limb here with one of my deep-thought
philosophical questions..

Like [censored] OR GET OFF THE POT.

ST said:

This is it guys....... No funky homemade charts/graphs or Google searching
is going to replace an opinion based on actual beliefs.

So what you're saying is, you've already decided that you won't let
any data get in the way of your beliefs. That's brill, dude.

Quoted message said:

Just like when
religion is bashed as unnecessary and the root of all evil

...which it of course is...

Quoted message said:

and violence in
history BUT when you find yourself in a life-or-death scenario ????-

...and?

-rj

P.S. Stevie, baby, as I've told you before, you need only use a
single item of punctuation at a time. There are almost no
exceptions. Here is a handy guide:

? = The sentence that precedes this mark is a question.
?? = The sentence that precedes these marks is a question the writer
wishes to emphasize strongly; use very sparingly.
??? = The writer is confused about punctuation.
???? = The writer is illiterate.

ST said:

I do not give an iota of [censored] what you want to post about me. If you do NOT
answer the question you are all nothing but bags of global warming hot air..

Well, finally you are on topic.

Just in case anyone cares, Eurosport is streaming live video
from the only Pro Tour race named after beer.

Bob Schwartz

On 4/20/08 6:50 AM, in article [email hidden],

Bob Schwartz said:

ST said:

I do not give an iota of [censored] what you want to post about me. If you do NOT
answer the question you are all nothing but bags of global warming hot air..

Well, finally you are on topic.

Just in case anyone cares, Eurosport is streaming live video
from the only Pro Tour race named after beer.

Bob Schwartz

Just what I have thought. NO attempt at all to even give a faint opinion to
either of the questions posed. At this point there is a total of 39 posts to
both threads. I am waiting for one of you windbags to offer ANY opinion. No
balls??

Quoted message said:

I was having difficulty understanding what point you
were making. Until I tried reading your post out loud in
the voice of Eric Cartman.

Oh. You're right, That works really well.

ST said:

Have you ever been accused of taking steroids?

Not everyone that has man-[censored] is taking steroids.
I guess some people don't know that.

Bob Schwartz

"Bob Schwartz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

ST said:

I do not give an iota of [censored] what you want to post about me. If you do NOT
answer the question you are all nothing but bags of global warming hot air..

Well, finally you are on topic.

Just in case anyone cares, Eurosport is streaming live video
from the only Pro Tour race named after beer.

I'm going to watch it as soon as cycling.tv gets it on the
video on demand link.

ST said:

OK......... I am going out on a limb here with one of my deep-thought
philosophical questions..

If Gays are BORN that way, no chance of changing desires or thought patterns
regarding relationship preferences then WHY does (mostly from the same left
-leaning group that agrees with the above statement) the liberal-leaning
crowd ALSO disagree with complete incarceration of, what we call, pedophiles
and related perpetrators instead calling for, at great cost, treatment with
psycho therapists and doctors and allowing these (our legal term) pedophiles
2nd and 3rd chances at out innocent citizens/children??

What is worse than going from a sometimes 50/50 chance of actually being
right predicting weather on the TV news to actually predicting Global
Warming caused by man and we are gonna all die in 50 years??

How about.......... Being elitist enough to know what behaviors are
INGRAINED and a genetic predisposition for then knowing exactly what
behaviors, regarding sexual preference,  that can be CURED and deserve
multiple chances by the same elite group?

Are you smartasses that smart enough to know where the line is?? And IF some
of you are gonna come back and say "It is all good UNLESS someone is
hurt/injured/violated!" I am still going to want to know where is the line,
regarding ANY sexual preference, between being born that way versus
individual decision? (free will)

If you can think of a way to rephrase things in such a way that a
"good" answer provides a way to raise taxes, then you'll get all the
nonsense you're hoping for.

SLAVE of THE STATE said:

If you can think of a way to rephrase things in such a way that a
"good" answer provides a way to raise taxes, then you'll get all the
nonsense you're hoping for.

Have you surrendered your Libertarian principals in favor of "Cut taxes,
Increase Spending!" Republican pragmatism?

Your former emphasis on the size and intrusiveness of government has
gone recently, along with your complaints about government spending. So
it sounds like you're falling into line. I know Rush Limbaugh will, but
I'm surprised that you beat him to it.