Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Why is there no spam in this section?

Started by 531Aussie · · Last activity · 10 posts · 1,378 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
20 March 2008
Last activity
24 March 2008
Original author
531Aussie
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,378
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. ????????????????????????????????????????

    Is someone monitoring it?

  2. On Mar 20, 2:30 pm, 531Aussie <531Aussie.36j...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    ????????????????????????????????????????

    Is someone monitoring it?

    --
    531Aussie

    Dunno what this section is from your end as I see you're posting
    through cyclingforums, but from my end it's a usenet newsgroup. It
    does get spammed, but not too badly.

  3. On Mar 20, 12:30 pm, 531Aussie <531Aussie.36j...@no-

    mx.forums.cyclingforums.com said:

    Is someone monitoring it?

    sshhhhh! You will wake the trolls!

  4. [email hidden said:

    "]

    Dunno what this section is from your end as I see you're posting
    through cyclingforums, but from my end it's a usenet newsgroup. It
    does get spammed, but not too badly.

    But I thought 'rec.bicycles.misc' and 'rec.bicycles.tech' are also part of USENET, and they can smashed with spam

  5. On 2008-03-20, 531Aussie (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Dunno what this section is from your end as I see you're posting
    through cyclingforums, but from my end it's a usenet newsgroup. It
    does get spammed, but not too badly.

    But I thought 'rec.bicycles.misc' and 'rec.bicycles.tech' are also part
    of USENET, and they can smashed with spam

    Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!

    --
    TimC
    "A distributed system is one in which I cannot get something done
    because a machine I've never heard of is down." -- Leslie Lamport

  6. TimC said:

    Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!

    The shrubber?

    BTH

  7. Hee Hee
    NNN I I I I !!!!!!!

    "BT Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    TimC said:

    Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!

    The shrubber?

    BTH

  8. Ken & Stace said:

    Hee Hee
    NNN I I I I !!!!!!!

    "BT Humble" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    TimC said:

    Pssst. Shutup before you wake Roger!

    The shrubber?

    BTH

    Except we are no longer the Knights Who Say "Ni"

  9. BT Humble said:

    The shrubber?

    No, the boxtard. Unfortunately the GKS has also been stirred from from it's slumber.

  10. On 2008-03-20, 531Aussie (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:


    ????????????????????????????????????????

    Is someone monitoring it?

    So who was the idiot who asked about spam?

    Thanks for waking them up!

    😉

    Now can you tell me why emacs's flyspell spellchecker doesn't like any
    of spam, flyspell, or spellchecker?

    --
    TimC
    "Application encountered an error while failing. Error recovered
    successfully, proceeding to fail"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.