kakman said:Hope you're not suggesting I don't value my kids. 😠
As you haven't seen the bike you can't really comment on its safety or quality. If you feel more comfortable spending $1000 that's great but it doesn't necessarily mean the cheaper bikes are any less safe. I love buying stuff for the kids but I'm wary of the "you have to spend this $### to be safe" sales pitch. As with adult bikes, your quality frame probably came from the same factory as my consumer frame. I'd rather spend the extra money on a decent helmet.
My 4 yo is currently riding his bike around the house - that's *inside* the house. The bike he has is way better than I would have expected and is the equal to the bikes the LBS were selling for about 3 times the amount. I'm not saying it's components are as good as a $1000 high end kiddie bike, but he ain't going to know the difference between 105 and pressed steel back pedal brakes. I certainly don't see it as a time bomb - at the end of the day they still have to conform to the Aussie standards.
If the only safe kids bikes were the $1000 ones, there'd be very few kids riding bikes.
/k
There is a difference between a kids bike and a toddler bike.
I mean, if you're gonna have a 8 - 12 year old jumping around or racing around the neighbourhood then yes, I think K-Mart bike is a form of infanticide.
I toddler ridong around the house ain't gonna put those pressures and strains on it.
I've seen the next door neighbour's (a 12 y.o girl) Toy-R-Us bike fold up from under her after she tried to stop with brakes that failed, causing her to hit a wall. I looked at the wreck. Very shoddy bike indeed.
So if you're talking about a rough kid or an average teen (esp boy), then K-Mart can equal child abuse.
If that happened to a Trek, Giant, Avanti or other well known brand with a Kid bike, I'd be very, very surprised.
Scotty
Scotty