Road Cycling · Public discussion

Recumbent OUCH!

Started by Rex Kerr · · Last activity · 17 posts · 800 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
12 January 2008
Last activity
16 January 2008
Original author
Rex Kerr
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
800
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A coworker has a SWB USS recumbent in the office... it's longer than
    the wall between his cube and the neighboring cube. A few minutes ago I
    was there talking about some issue and when I turn to leave I hit the
    extended chainring with my knee. My "catch the falling bike!" instinct
    kicks in and I go to grab it and drive a chainring tooth deep into the
    soft tissue between my thumb and forefinger.

    OUCH! Now blood is dripping all over!!

    See, if it'd been a DF bike that wouldn't have happened! First, it
    would have fit in the space provided like the dozens of other bikes
    around here, and second the chainring would have been in a safer location!!!

    Just trolling... :-)

  2. Former RANS V-Rex rider Rex Kerr said:

    A coworker has a SWB USS recumbent in the office... it's longer than
    the wall between his cube and the neighboring cube. A few minutes ago I
    was there talking about some issue and when I turn to leave I hit the
    extended chainring with my knee. My "catch the falling bike!" instinct
    kicks in and I go to grab it and drive a chainring tooth deep into the
    soft tissue between my thumb and forefinger.

    OUCH! Now blood is dripping all over!!

    See, if it'd been a DF bike that wouldn't have happened! First, it
    would have fit in the space provided like the dozens of other bikes
    around here, and second the chainring would have been in a safer
    location!!!

    Just trolling... :-)

    You are being punished by the Gods of RANS for your loss of faith.

    The exposed chain wheels are there to punish the clumsy. They also serve
    to shift the advantage from pedestrian to cyclist in a collision (the
    pedestrian almost always wins in an upright bicycle to pedestrian
    collision).

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people." A. Derleth

  3. Tom Sherman said:

    You are being punished by the Gods of RANS for your loss of faith.

    Man, good memory. Yeah, I dabbled for a number of years, but I'm now
    recumbent free.

    That said, perhaps you're right. After years of injury free recumbent
    ownership I get this from a stray recumbent!

  4. In article said:
    Tom Sherman said:

    You are being punished by the Gods of RANS for your loss of faith.

    Man, good memory. Yeah, I dabbled for a number of years, but I'm now
    recumbent free.

    That said, perhaps you're right. After years of injury free recumbent
    ownership I get this from a stray recumbent!

    What drove your apostasy?

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "My scenarios may give the impression I could be an excellent crook.
    Not true - I am a talented lawyer." - Sandy in rec.bicycles.racing

  5. Tom Sherman said:
    Former RANS V-Rex rider Rex Kerr said:

    A coworker has a SWB USS recumbent in the office... it's longer than
    the wall between his cube and the neighboring cube. A few minutes ago
    I was there talking about some issue and when I turn to leave I hit
    the extended chainring with my knee. My "catch the falling bike!"
    instinct kicks in and I go to grab it and drive a chainring tooth deep
    into the soft tissue between my thumb and forefinger.

    OUCH! Now blood is dripping all over!!

    See, if it'd been a DF bike that wouldn't have happened! First, it
    would have fit in the space provided like the dozens of other bikes
    around here, and second the chainring would have been in a safer
    location!!!

    Just trolling... :-)

    You are being punished by the Gods of RANS for your loss of faith.

    The exposed chain wheels are there to punish the clumsy. They also serve
    to shift the advantage from pedestrian to cyclist in a collision (the
    pedestrian almost always wins in an upright bicycle to pedestrian
    collision).


    The Gods of RANS have a funny way of punishing people.
    About the chainring sticking out. A df wheel sticks out a similar
    distance as the chainrings on a SWB recumbent.

  6. Quoted message said:

    The Gods of RANS have a funny way of punishing people.
    About the chainring sticking out. A df wheel sticks out a similar
    distance as the chainrings on a SWB recumbent.

    Nope, I owned a recumbent, and it most definitely was longer than my DF
    bikes. Also, the wheels on my bikes tend to not be as sharp as a
    chainring. :-)

    PS: Why the crosspost? Mine was in fun, but crossposting to the
    recumbent group is just asking for a flamewar!

  7. Former V-Rex Owner Rex Kerr said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Gods of RANS have a funny way of punishing people.
    About the chainring sticking out. A df wheel sticks out a similar
    distance as the chainrings on a SWB recumbent.

    Nope, I owned a recumbent, and it most definitely was longer than my DF
    bikes. Also, the wheels on my bikes tend to not be as sharp as a
    chainring. :-)

    Chain guards that cover the chainrings from approximately 12 o'clock to
    6 o'clock (clockwise, looking at the drive side) are commercially
    available for SWB recumbents, as long as the tooth count is not too large.

    Quoted message said:

    PS: Why the crosspost? Mine was in fun, but crossposting to the
    recumbent group is just asking for a flamewar!

    The subject was on-topic to more than one group. Furthermore, discussion
    is fun. Usenet should not be boring.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  8. Ryan Cousineau said:
    Quoted message said:

    That said, perhaps you're right. After years of injury free recumbent
    ownership I get this from a stray recumbent!

    What drove your apostasy?

    The fact that I enjoy riding my DF bikes much more and actually find
    them to be more comfortable than my V-Rex was. That's me, and others
    may disagree, but for now I'm a DF rider.

  9. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think 'diamond frame' is a very good term for an upright bicycle.
    I think 'upright' is a far better term since it describes how you are
    seated on the bike. That is what matters, not how the bike is constructed.

    I've done my best to explain to the Great Saint that one does not sit
    upright on an upright bicycle seat if one is to be comfortable on an upright
    bicycle. Is it possible that a Great Saint could be lacking cognitive
    ability?

  10. Rex Kerr said:
    Quoted message said:

    The Gods of RANS have a funny way of punishing people.
    About the chainring sticking out. A df wheel sticks out a similar
    distance as the chainrings on a SWB recumbent.

    Nope, I owned a recumbent, and it most definitely was longer than my DF
    bikes. Also, the wheels on my bikes tend to not be as sharp as a
    chainring. :-)

    PS: Why the crosspost? Mine was in fun, but crossposting to the
    recumbent group is just asking for a flamewar!

    Why are you not a recumbent owner any longer? Did you stop riding
    altogether? Or was the recumbent too fast for you in the flats? Just
    joking. But seriously I have been riding recumbents now for a couple of
    years and I own df bikes and they haven't left the garage in probably 6
    months or more.

  11. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Wilson Warmouth" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I don't think 'diamond frame' is a very good term for an upright
    bicycle. I think 'upright' is a far better term since it describes how
    you are seated on the bike. That is what matters, not how the bike is
    constructed.

    I've done my best to explain to the Great Saint that one does not sit
    upright on an upright bicycle seat if one is to be comfortable on an
    upright bicycle. Is it possible that a Great Saint could be lacking
    cognitive ability?

    Unless you posted to ARBR I did not see your message.

    It is understood that you sort of lean against the seat (saddle) with your
    weight evenly distributed between your butt, your legs and your arms.

    Yes. This is the way thousands and thousands of men, women, and children
    ride upright/diamond frame bikes in comfort for up to 100 miles or more in a
    days time.

    Quoted message said:

    However, that is for racers only. The rest of us sit on the god damn
    things and suffer accordingly. Ever notice how hybrid type of bikes have
    replaced road bikes for the general populace? That is because everyone is
    reconciled to sitting upright on saddles despite what racers do.

    We are talking about recreational riders not racers, not supermen, not
    superwomen, not superchildren. The Great Saint said he has ridden organized
    cross-state rides so surely he must have noticed the diamond frame riders
    around him riding in comfort. If an upright/diamond frame bike not properly
    fitted or ridden correctly it will most likely be uncomfortable if ridden
    for any length of time. The same can be said of some recumbents. Google
    "recumbent butt" for confirmation. Bikes that are not properly fitted tend
    to spend a lot of time garaged with their tires flat.

    Quoted message said:


    Another interesting phenomenon is that recumbents are not exactly that
    either since you sit on them in a semi-recumbent position. But a recumbent
    racer may very well be in a full recumbent position on some very special
    racing recumbents. But they are totally impractical for general street
    use.

    My recumbent bike, an Easy Racer GRR, is a refined design that has stood the
    test of time. I find it completely practical for general street use. This
    bike meets my needs and I desire no other recumbent bike.

    Quoted message said:

    By the way, a bike saddle will cause all kind of groin problems sooner or
    later, especially if you ride for many hours every day. The medical
    literature is full of tales of woe of cyclists who have suffered serious
    injury in the groin area from too much cycling. This NEVER happens with a
    recumbent because you are seated on a proper seat, not a saddle. Alas, too
    late we get wise.

    Not to be trite, but too much of a good thing can sometimes be way too much
    of a good thing. It's unfortunate that someone didn't come up with the
    name "woody bike" instead of "recumbent bike" (if you don't understand this
    ask your physician about "men's health" and bike riding).

  12. Wilson Warmouth said:

    Yes. This is the way thousands and thousands of men, women, and children
    ride upright/diamond frame bikes in comfort for up to 100 miles or more in a
    days time.

    Comfort is a relative thing. The seat I'm sat in as I type this is one
    I'd describe as quite comfy, but for just sitting in it's also the case
    that it's considerably /less/ comfy than the easy chairs in my sitting
    room. Of course, they're lousy for mouse and keyboard use, which is why
    I don't use them at a computer, but in terms of seated comfort the easy
    chairs are just /better/.

    As long as the recumbent seat doesn't interfere with anything else you
    need to do on the bike (like work the steering), it remains the case
    that better is better.

    But, as one can easily demonstrate with a decent work chair, "less
    comfortable" does not equate to "uncomfortable" or "problematical".

    I ride my 'bent on long distance rides primarily for reasons of greater
    comfort and hence greater enjoyment over thr course of several hours,
    but I still enjoyed myself on the DF tourer I used to have, and still
    enjoy using my upright folder,

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  13. Edward Dolan said:

    Rex Kerr must have an iron ass.

    I may have to adopt this as a nickname.

    Quoted message said:

    I have never heard of anyone who thought it was more comfy to sit on


    a saddle than a proper seat. However, the thought also occurs to me that
    he is most likely insane.

    Yep, they undo the straps on my straight jacket long enough for me to
    type a message or two a few times per day.

    Quoted message said:

    I suspect the most comfy seat in his house is the toilet seat in the


    bathroom.

    For its purpose, yes. It works MUCH better than any other for that purpose.

    Quoted message said:

    By the way (speaking of [censored]), what is this DF [censored]?

    As explained by others, DF = diamond frame since one could draw a
    diamond (almost parallelogram) between the top tube and chainstays vs.
    downtube and seat stays.

    That said, I've found road bikes with the handlebars properly placed at
    seat height and a well worn Brooks saddle to be extremely comfortable.
    When I sit on my most ridden Brooks my weight is so well distributed
    that it actually feels quite soft, almost pillow like. The width of a
    B17 is perfect for me. On my last tour with 10+ hours per day in the
    saddle I found that I was resting on the steepest climbs (12%-14%) by
    placing my foot on the guardrail and sitting on the saddle since it was
    difficult to get off of the fully loaded bike on a steep hill. I felt
    no immediate need to get off of the saddle!

    On recumbents (I've ridden a few, and owned the V-Rex for about 5 years)
    I could never seem to find the right position. My toes would get numb
    with high bottom brackets, I'd be sitting in a pool of sweat, my glutes
    would be numb from sitting on them while they're trying to work, etc.
    Not to mention, the few times that I unexpectedly needed to get home
    fast and took the train it was darn near impossible to get that thing
    on/off the train!!

    There were a few times when I preferred riding the recumbent. I loved
    the low down feeling when descending and doing the twisties, it was
    exhilarating. I also found them to be best when riding with slow
    riders. When riding really slow I find that I put too much pressure on
    a regular saddle and it does get uncomfortable more quickly. In those
    cases, a big easy chair is more appropriate, but I don't often ride that
    way, and when I do I just spend more time standing out of the saddle to
    compensate.

    Sorry, but they're just not for everybody! Perhaps lack of
    marketing/availability isn't the only reason that they're not more common?

    -Rex

  14. yeah, I ride a SWB recumbent.

    It has occurred to me that the chain ring is located on the leading
    edge of my bike as it goes down the road, maybe I should sharpen the
    teeth from time to time?

    One time on RAGBRAI there was this non-rider with a video camera
    kneeling right on the center line at the bottom of a pretty good hill
    - I think it occurred to him as I crossed the line about 20' in front
    of him going about 40

  15. Edward Dolan said:

    ...
    I agree that Easy Racers got it right from the beginning. The only thing is
    that you need to get the seat laid back enough to get some of your weight
    off your butt. That cobra seat however was a disaster. Recumbents require
    foam seats for total comfort....

    However, the Easy Racers Cobra seat is quite comfortable compared to the
    pre-Cobra hard-shell seat (which even looked uncomfortable).

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "And never forget, life ultimately makes failures of all people."
    - A. Derleth

  16. DennisTheBald said:

    yeah, I ride a SWB recumbent.

    It has occurred to me that the chain ring is located on the leading
    edge of my bike as it goes down the road, maybe I should sharpen the
    teeth from time to time?

    Oh man, don't do it. I snagged my brand new wool jersey (only the
    second time I've worn it) tonight when I put the bike away (and a DF
    bike at that!) on the storage rack, and poked a nice hole on the front
    of the jersey just below my belly button is :-(

    Waaaaah!!!!!


  17. Quoted message said:

    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Edward Dolan wrote:

    [....]

    Quoted message said:

    I never found the Cobra seat at all comfortable. Easy Racers soon went to
    a mesh back seat with a foam base copied from RANS. Some like the hard
    shell seat because it gives you marginally a greater push on the pedals,
    but it is not worth it. [...]

    The Great Saint is right about one thing. I have a Cobra seat for my Easy
    Racer as well as an older RANS short back seat. The Cobra seat gives me mild
    recumbent butt after an hour or so. I can walk off the RB in a few minutes,
    but it will come back in another hour or less. The RANS seat is by far the
    best choice for long distance riding.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.