Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

caloric

Started by Bill Cotton · · Last activity · 7 posts · 447 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
15 December 2007
Last activity
16 December 2007
Original author
Bill Cotton
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
447
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a Cateye bike computer, Velo8, on my training setup, that gives
    Caloric reading. I am trying to find a constant that I can apply to the same
    reading from my gps mileage reading. The first three reading are miles.
    Below is days on my trainer at the same time, one hour.
    Course Trainer Trainer Trainer Trainer Trainer
    Max 24.20 17.00 25.50 28.50 29.40
    Average 13.90 14.60 14.20 16.80 18.00
    Distance 13.95 14.63 14.31 16.93 18.00
    Mov Time 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Caloric 330.09 362.00 346.70 547.80 629.00

    --
    www.billcotton.com

  2. Bill Cotton said:

    I have a Cateye bike computer, Velo8, on my training setup, that gives
    Caloric reading. I am trying to find a constant that I can apply to the same
    reading from my gps mileage reading. The first three reading are miles.
    Below is days on my trainer at the same time, one hour.
    Course Trainer Trainer Trainer Trainer Trainer
    Max 24.20 17.00 25.50 28.50 29.40
    Average 13.90 14.60 14.20 16.80 18.00
    Distance 13.95 14.63 14.31 16.93 18.00
    Mov Time 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Caloric 330.09 362.00 346.70 547.80 629.00

    Dear Bill,

    The right-hand article should illuminate the matter:

    http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/pageviewer?frames=1&coll=moa&view=50&root=%2Fmoa%2Fmanu%2Fmanu0001%2F&tif=00240.TIF&cite=http%3A%2F%2Fcdl.library.cornell.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmoa%2Fmoa-cgi%3Fnotisid%3DABS1821-0001-456

    I assume that nothing has changed since 1869.

    :-)

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  3. Quoted message said:

    The right-hand article should illuminate the matter:

    http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/pageviewer?frames=1&coll=m...

    I assume that nothing has changed since 1869.

    A modern rule of thumb for walking or running on firm level ground is
    1 kcal/kg/km.

  4. On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:48:45 -0800 (PST), [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    The right-hand article should illuminate the matter:

    http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/moa/pageviewer?frames=1&coll=m...

    I assume that nothing has changed since 1869.

    A modern rule of thumb for walking or running on firm level ground is
    1 kcal/kg/km.

    Dear Robert,

    More seriously than my link to 1869 data about velocipedes, Bill's
    question is how things are figured when an hour at ~18 mph on the
    trainer is said to take about twice as many calories as the same hour
    at ~14 mph.

    Your rule of thumb is probably quite true, but the speed and distance
    increased less than 30%, while the predicted calories increased
    roughly 100%.

    The difference is probably due to the fact that the power required to
    overcome wind drag, which soon becomes the major factor, rises with
    the cube of speed.

    If we cube ~18/14, we get about 2.1, fairly close to the roughly
    doubled calories that Bill's cyclocomputer claims.

    There might be some fudge factor involved for tire drag and
    transmission losses, which don't rise at the alarming rate of wind
    drag.

    Of course, the cyclometer may use some entirely different calculation.

    Cheers,

    Carl Fogel

  5. Quoted message said:

    More seriously than my link to 1869 data about velocipedes, Bill's
    question is how things are figured when an hour at ~18 mph on the
    trainer is said to take about twice as many calories as the same hour
    at ~14 mph.

    Bill's computer is probably lying to him when he's using it on a
    trainer.
    http://www.geocities.com/almost_fast/trainerpower/

  6. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    More seriously than my link to 1869 data about velocipedes, Bill's
    question is how things are figured when an hour at ~18 mph on the
    trainer is said to take about twice as many calories as the same hour
    at ~14 mph.

    Bill's computer is probably lying to him when he's using it on a
    trainer.
    http://www.geocities.com/almost_fast/trainerpower/


    I agree that my Cateye Velo8 cyclecomputer is lying as to the actually
    calories, however, I like to know what constant(s) is being use in its
    computer. I want to use such a constant in by free bikelog that I make
    available each year. http://www.billcotton.com/my_training.htm possibly
    relating altitude gains (that the gps averages out), into the mix.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bill Cotton said:

    I have a Cateye bike computer, Velo8, on my training setup, that gives
    Caloric reading. I am trying to find a constant that I can apply to the same
    reading from my gps mileage reading. The first three reading are miles.
    Below is days on my trainer at the same time, one hour.
    Course Trainer Trainer Trainer Trainer Trainer
    Max 24.20 17.00 25.50 28.50 29.40
    Average 13.90 14.60 14.20 16.80 18.00
    Distance 13.95 14.63 14.31 16.93 18.00
    Mov Time 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Caloric 330.09 362.00 346.70 547.80 629.00

    Drag is not a constant, we don't know how the device samples the
    velocity, and it is meaningless to make your calculations without taking
    the wind into account.

    --
    My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, 4ax.com, buzzardnews.com, googlegroups.com,
    heapnode.com, localhost, ntli.net, teranews.com, vif.com, x-privat.org

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.