Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Fat Tired Track Bikes

Started by Pilgrim · · Last activity · 11 posts · 604 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 December 2007
Last activity
14 December 2007
Original author
Pilgrim
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
604
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've recently become a fan of 26" wheels, and fat tires. I do most of
    my riding on city streets, and between the crumbling asphalt, subway
    grates, and street-car tracks, fat tires are almost a necessity. I
    don't doubt that skinny wheels roll faster, but I do doubt that they
    roll so much faster as to make their tendency to dent rims, and get
    flats worth it.

    So run fat tires, what's the problem? All the bikes that have
    chainstays wide enough to accept fat meats are mountain bike or BMX
    style frames which also happen to feature sloping top tubes so you can
    put the seat really low since most of the serious pedaling in those
    sports is done out of saddle.

    I want my top tube flat, and my seat stays tall because I keep my seat
    high so that my legs are fully extended when I'm in the saddle. A long
    seat post would get me up high, but that combined with the higher BB
    of most dirt bikes makes me feel like I'm riding a folding bike.

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires. Maybe
    something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say "Fatties
    Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for the lowered
    BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

  2. On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:45:57 -0800 (PST), Pilgrim <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I've recently become a fan of 26" wheels, and fat tires. I do most of
    my riding on city streets, and between the crumbling asphalt, subway
    grates, and street-car tracks, fat tires are almost a necessity. I
    don't doubt that skinny wheels roll faster,

    All things being equal, fat tyres are faster up to the point where
    their increased aerodynamic drag outweighs their lower rolling
    resistance.

    Quoted message said:

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires. Maybe
    something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say "Fatties
    Fit Fine".

    There are plenty of wide 700c tyres now; I'd at least look at a cyclo
    cross frame, some of them will take 700x42s. There are also 700c
    hybrids to consider, with more conventional frame shapes than current
    MTBs, and of course old school rigid MTBs had horizontal top tubes.

    You don't say what you want it for, besides urban assaults. If it's a
    beater, a 1980s rigid MTB would do. If you are stuck with the terrain
    but want a no expense spared play bike, a custom frame in 853 or even
    953 could be built around your favourite tyre and selected riding
    position
    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  3. Pilgrim said:

    So run fat tires, what's the problem? All the bikes that have
    chainstays wide enough to accept fat meats are mountain bike or BMX
    style frames which also happen to feature sloping top tubes so you can
    put the seat really low since most of the serious pedaling in those
    sports is done out of saddle.

    The sloping top tube on mountain bikes is to provide adequate standover
    despite the tall front end. Not many people would be tall enough to
    ride a bike with a long travel fork and a level top tube. Mountain bikes
    come with long seatposts so that the saddle can be set at a normal
    height. Every recreational mountain biker I've encountered did the vast
    majority of their pedaling seated.

    Quoted message said:

    I want my top tube flat, and my seat stays tall because I keep my seat
    high so that my legs are fully extended when I'm in the saddle. A long
    seat post would get me up high, but that combined with the higher BB
    of most dirt bikes makes me feel like I'm riding a folding bike.

    If sloping top tubes turn you off aesthetically or you have other
    reasons for avoiding mountain bikes, that's one thing. But don't reject
    mountain bikes because you think they're not supposed to be set up for
    full leg extension. They are.

    Quoted message said:

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires. Maybe
    something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say "Fatties
    Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for the lowered
    BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    I'm not sure about that, but a Steamroller with some fat 700c tires
    seems like it would do the job nicely. Something like the Schwalbe Big
    Apple in 50mm or 60mm should be cushier than any 26" slick tire.

  4. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Pilgrim said:

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires.
    Maybe something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say
    "Fatties Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for
    the lowered BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    http://www.mariposabicycles.com/fixed-650b.html

    http://www.rawlandcycles.com/store/index.php?strWebAction=item_detail&int
    ItemID=3420

    Or just put fat tires on the Steamroller, you can probably run Schwalbe
    Big Apples if you want. If those aren't fat enough, it's time to move
    somewhere else.

  5. Pilgrim wrote:
    Snip

    Quoted message said:


    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires. Maybe
    something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say "Fatties
    Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for the lowered
    BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    Give some thought to a Surley Pugsley.. Seriously FAT tires

    Steve

  6. Steve said:

    Pilgrim wrote:
    Snip

    Quoted message said:


    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires. Maybe
    something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say "Fatties
    Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for the lowered
    BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    Give some thought to a Surley Pugsley.. Seriously FAT tires

    Steve


    Sure, if most of your riding is in soft sand.

  7. "Tim McNamara" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Pilgrim said:

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires.
    Maybe something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say
    "Fatties Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for
    the lowered BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    http://www.mariposabicycles.com/fixed-650b.html

    Nice!
    I still enjoy looking at them...<smile>
    -tom

  8. Tim McNamara said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Pilgrim said:

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires.
    Maybe something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say
    "Fatties Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for
    the lowered BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    http://www.mariposabicycles.com/fixed-650b.html

    http://www.rawlandcycles.com/store/index.php?strWebAction=item_detail...
    ItemID=3420

    Or just put fat tires on the Steamroller, you can probably run Schwalbe
    Big Apples if you want. If those aren't fat enough, it's time to move
    somewhere else.

    Those Mariposas are beautiful. The Porteur bike, especially. Drum
    brakes are a nice surprise. Looks like they're closing their store and
    likely their shop though....

    /s

  9. "Scott Gordo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tim McNamara said:

    In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    Pilgrim said:

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires.
    Maybe something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say
    "Fatties Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for
    the lowered BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    http://www.mariposabicycles.com/fixed-650b.html

    http://www.rawlandcycles.com/store/index.php?strWebAction=item_detail...
    ItemID=3420

    Or just put fat tires on the Steamroller, you can probably run Schwalbe
    Big Apples if you want. If those aren't fat enough, it's time to move
    somewhere else.

    Those Mariposas are beautiful. The Porteur bike, especially. Drum
    brakes are a nice surprise. Looks like they're closing their store and
    likely their shop though....

    /s

    Saw that too,
    the Shimano Nexave "Roller Brake" is a drum brake?
    -tom

  10. Pilgrim said:

    I've recently become a fan of 26" wheels, and fat tires. I do most of
    my riding on city streets, and between the crumbling asphalt, subway
    grates, and street-car tracks, fat tires are almost a necessity. I
    don't doubt that skinny wheels roll faster, but I do doubt that they
    roll so much faster as to make their tendency to dent rims, and get
    flats worth it.

    So run fat tires, what's the problem? All the bikes that have
    chainstays wide enough to accept fat meats are mountain bike or BMX
    style frames which also happen to feature sloping top tubes so you can
    put the seat really low since most of the serious pedaling in those
    sports is done out of saddle.

    I want my top tube flat, and my seat stays tall because I keep my seat
    high so that my legs are fully extended when I'm in the saddle. A long
    seat post would get me up high, but that combined with the higher BB
    of most dirt bikes makes me feel like I'm riding a folding bike.

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires. Maybe
    something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say "Fatties
    Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for the lowered
    BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    I found an old MTB from the pre-compact days to make an urban fixer for
    my son. He loves it.

  11. Pilgrim said:

    Basically, I want a frame with road geometry, and fat 26" tires. Maybe
    something like a Surly Steamroller since it's chainstays say "Fatties
    Fit Fine". Assuming I use shorter cranks to compensate for the lowered
    BB, would a rig like that be a good idea?

    If you ride a small-size frame (42-54 cm) the Surly Long Haul Trucker
    is set up for 26" wheels and will take up to a 2.1" tire with fenders.
    Otherwise, I would say go with a Crosscheck and run 700C tires, it
    will take 40-42 no problem.

    I don't think you'd want to use the Steamroller for commuting. It's a
    pretty specialized track frame with no braze-ons at all -- making it
    more difficult to use things like gears, brakes, racks, fenders...
    Plus, I can't imagine that the bike would be comfortable or handle
    well with the smaller wheels.

    If you're totally set on 26" wheels, and you can't use the small Long
    Haul Trucker, then go with a mountain bike frame. Like others have
    said, the old mountain bikes pretty much had road geometry anyways.

    Regards,
    Anthony

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.