UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle path standards

Started by marc · · Last activity · 8 posts · 407 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
9 November 2007
Last activity
12 November 2007
Original author
marc
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
407
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. my LA have just spent a large chunk of other peoples money on cycle
    routes to nowhere, and I'm in the middle of trying to persuade them that
    they should be providing cycle parking at key points such as the leisure
    centre. I can handle the leisure centre bit ( I will send them a picture
    every day of the single bike rack full) but I also wnat to point out
    that their brand spanking new path is dangerous by being narrow and by
    causing a bottle neck at the enterance to the centre. They have replied
    with "the route was designed in consultation with Sustrans and that the
    specifications used were based on the standards set out in their
    National Cycle Network guidance" anyone any idea where I can find the
    stnadards to check?

  2. marc said:

    my LA have just spent a large chunk of other peoples money on cycle
    routes to nowhere, and I'm in the middle of trying to persuade them that
    they should be providing cycle parking at key points such as the leisure
    centre. I can handle the leisure centre bit ( I will send them a picture
    every day of the single bike rack full) but I also wnat to point out
    that their brand spanking new path is dangerous by being narrow and by
    causing a bottle neck at the enterance to the centre. They have replied
    with "the route was designed in consultation with Sustrans and that the
    specifications used were based on the standards set out in their
    National Cycle Network guidance" anyone any idea where I can find the
    stnadards to check?

    You might find something here http://www.sustrans.org.uk/default.asp?sID=1149001882109

    Regards,

    Duncan

  3. Quoted message said:

    You might find something here http://www.sustrans.org.uk/default.asp?sID=1149001882109

    that some muppet has decided should be split into lots of small ugly
    and inconsistently laid out PDFs so you can't find what you're looking
    for. In fact the layout reminds me of many cycle paths.

    Jon

  4. "marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    my LA have just spent a large chunk of other peoples money on cycle
    routes to nowhere, and I'm in the middle of trying to persuade them that
    they should be providing cycle parking at key points such as the leisure
    centre. I can handle the leisure centre bit ( I will send them a picture
    every day of the single bike rack full) but I also wnat to point out
    that their brand spanking new path is dangerous by being narrow and by
    causing a bottle neck at the enterance to the centre. They have replied
    with "the route was designed in consultation with Sustrans and that the
    specifications used were based on the standards set out in their
    National Cycle Network guidance" anyone any idea where I can find the
    stnadards to check?

    Another possible source
    http://www.tfl.gov.uk/businessandpartners/publications/2766.aspx

  5. Marc

    Why not send some pictures to us at Warrington Cycle Campaign

    See our Facility of the Month page

    www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk

    Best regards

    Rod King

    "marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    my LA have just spent a large chunk of other peoples money on cycle
    routes to nowhere, and I'm in the middle of trying to persuade them that
    they should be providing cycle parking at key points such as the leisure
    centre. I can handle the leisure centre bit ( I will send them a picture
    every day of the single bike rack full) but I also wnat to point out
    that their brand spanking new path is dangerous by being narrow and by
    causing a bottle neck at the enterance to the centre. They have replied
    with "the route was designed in consultation with Sustrans and that the
    specifications used were based on the standards set out in their
    National Cycle Network guidance" anyone any idea where I can find the
    stnadards to check?

  6. Marc

    Why not send some pictures to us at Warrington Cycle Campaign

    See our Facility of the Month page

    www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk

    Best regards

    Rod King

    "marc" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    my LA have just spent a large chunk of other peoples money on cycle
    routes to nowhere, and I'm in the middle of trying to persuade them that
    they should be providing cycle parking at key points such as the leisure
    centre. I can handle the leisure centre bit ( I will send them a picture
    every day of the single bike rack full) but I also wnat to point out
    that their brand spanking new path is dangerous by being narrow and by
    causing a bottle neck at the enterance to the centre. They have replied
    with "the route was designed in consultation with Sustrans and that the
    specifications used were based on the standards set out in their
    National Cycle Network guidance" anyone any idea where I can find the
    stnadards to check?

  7. Rod King said:

    Marc

    Why not send some pictures to us at Warrington Cycle Campaign

    See our Facility of the Month page

    www.warringtoncyclecampaign.co.uk

    Best regards

    Rod King

    These aren't really in the same league of stupidity as most of yours,
    although there is one part of NCN 04 that deserves "recognition" ,the
    path i'm querying is politically important becuase it runs past the
    Council HQ, so if I can get it recognised as needing alteration after
    they have installed it it will be in the officers and coucillors faces.

  8. marc said:

    my LA have just spent a large chunk of other peoples money on cycle
    routes to nowhere, and I'm in the middle of trying to persuade them that
    they should be providing cycle parking at key points such as the leisure
    centre. I can handle the leisure centre bit ( I will send them a picture
    every day of the single bike rack full) but I also wnat to point out
    that their brand spanking new path is dangerous by being narrow and by
    causing a bottle neck at the enterance to the centre. They have replied
    with "the route was designed in consultation with Sustrans and that the
    specifications used were based on the standards set out in their
    National Cycle Network guidance" anyone any idea where I can find the
    stnadards to check?

    Point out to them that cycle routes (on roads) are pointless and do
    nothing but mentally segregate cyclists from other road users, not
    physically, and generally put them in greater danger?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.