Paul Boyd usenet.is.worse@plusnet said:Tony Raven said the following on 01/11/2007 12:51:
<snip>
Quoted message said:Presumably the records can be recovered from their backups so that they
can at least get in touch with people. They would have had backups,
wouldn't they??
--
Paul Boydhttp://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/
Drifting off into an OT rant (sorry, can't work out how to change the
subject line with Google groups):
I've no idea about RJ Chicken, but you might be surprised how many
businesses (even relatively large ones) don't.
It's an area I work in, and in addition to firms who don't do backups
at all, I've come across:
A very comprehensive and complete set of backups, every one of them
kept in a filing cabinet in the computer room, beside the servers.
A very comprehensive and complete set of backups, all encrypted on the
media (best practice where the tapes are stored off site), but no one
has the key to decrypt them.
A very comprehensive and complete set of backup tapes, with exactly no
contents on any of them - the backup had been set up incorrectly on
day one, four years earlier.
The media had been loaded/unloaded correctly, and even replaced on
schedule, but no one had ever done a test restore
No one had even read the logs where it said, every day for 4 years,
(and this may have been the first clue) "0 files written to tape".
A large firm (500+ direct employees) who got a new "remote disk
mirror" at their second site - as soon as the data was written at the
main site, it was replicated to the secondary site. As both site
weren't going to get burnt down on the same day, they then decided to
"save money" by stopping doing backups to tape. When their DBA
accidentaly overwrote a large chunk of data, this mistake was
immediately and efficently replicated to their second site.
Backups normally run fine. It's the restores that are troublesome...
regards,
bookieb