General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

define low carb

Started by sycochkn · · Last activity · 4 posts · 193 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 October 2007
Last activity
27 October 2007
Original author
sycochkn
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
193
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. What percentage of calories from carbs, fats and proteins?

    Bob

  2. sycochkn said:

    What percentage of calories from carbs, fats and proteins?

    Bob

    15% of a 500 calorie diet is a lot different from 15% of a 2000 calorie
    diet or 15% of a 4000 calorie diet.

    A) If carbs were "poison", they would be expressed as absolute weight,
    not relative measure, such as percent.

    B) Some "low carb" approaches let you find your limit of "low carb" by
    initial restriction and gradually adding carbs back. So, "low carb" is
    specifically tailored to your body response.

    C) Some "low carb" approaches use different percentages.

    D) Some "low carb" approaches use actual carb weights.

    E) Some "low carb" approaches use instead a subset of all carbs, based
    on some body response such as Glycemic Index, which of course varies
    greatly between people for the same foods.

    F) All of the above.

    G) None of the above.

    Some days, I vote for both F) and G).

  3. "Jim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    sycochkn said:

    What percentage of calories from carbs, fats and proteins?

    Bob

    15% of a 500 calorie diet is a lot different from 15% of a 2000 calorie
    diet or 15% of a 4000 calorie diet.

    A) If carbs were "poison", they would be expressed as absolute weight, not
    relative measure, such as percent.

    B) Some "low carb" approaches let you find your limit of "low carb" by
    initial restriction and gradually adding carbs back. So, "low carb" is
    specifically tailored to your body response.

    C) Some "low carb" approaches use different percentages.

    D) Some "low carb" approaches use actual carb weights.

    E) Some "low carb" approaches use instead a subset of all carbs, based on
    some body response such as Glycemic Index, which of course varies greatly
    between people for the same foods.

    F) All of the above.

    G) None of the above.

    Some days, I vote for both F) and G).

    The body tends to work in terms of weight of carbs, not %. Also, activity
    definitely influences the amount needed for adequate functioning.

  4. sycochkn said:

    What percentage of calories from carbs, fats and proteins?

    I think the absolute amount of carb is more important than the
    percentage. Your body reacts to the amount of glucose in the blood,
    which isn't based on percentage so much as amount.

    Atkins says start at 20g carb and up it gradually each week until you
    find your own tolerance based on weight loss.

    Eades say 30g carb until health issues resolve, then up.

    Bernstein says 30g carb forever and ever.

    My blood glucose meter says there's no difference between 30g carb and
    50g carb.

    Most people would likely greatly improve their diets just by quitting
    white sugar, white flour, white rice and potatoes and replacing those
    foods with nonstarchy vegetables and low-sugar fruit.

    Davis says go ddown to under 50g carb if you have weight to lose,
    otherwise just cut out the wheat products and sugar.

    How low you go depends on why you're doing it.

    --
    http://www.ornery-geeks.org/consulting/

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.