General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
While whale watching at the harbor this weekend...
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- General fitness, health and nutrition
- Published
- 27 October 2007
- Last activity
- 4 November 2007
- Original author
- Fujikawa Yamamoto
- Posts
- 29
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 287
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
Good for you!! Someone needs to lighten things up occasionally!
BTW I don't think O crossposted!
Gillian
Fujikawa Yamamoto said:
-
On 27 Oct 2007 00:55:03 GMT, Fujikawa Yamamoto <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Fujimoto, you have just made the day for Ragnar by posting that link.
Casual Observer
-
On 26 Oct 2007, Casual Observer posted some
news:[email hidden]:Quoted message said:
On 27 Oct 2007 00:55:03 GMT, Fujikawa Yamamoto <[email hidden]>Quoted message said:
Fujimoto, you have just made the day for Ragnar by posting that link.
Casual Observer
This should really get him going.
-
Fujikawa Yamamoto said:
On 26 Oct 2007, Casual Observer posted somenews:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
On 27 Oct 2007 00:55:03 GMT, Fujikawa Yamamoto <[email hidden]>
wrote:Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Fujimoto, you have just made the day for Ragnar by posting that link.
Quoted message said:
Casual Observer
This should really get him going.
Why is everyone so interested in the sex life of Raggy and his big
mama? Maybe if you guys were less interested in what floats his boat
and more into what floats yours, you might actually stand a chance of
one day getting laid.I know it sounds highly improbable but stranger things have happened.
-
Fujikawa Yamamoto said:
On 26 Oct 2007, Casual Observer posted somenews:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
On 27 Oct 2007 00:55:03 GMT, Fujikawa Yamamoto <[email hidden]>
wrote:Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Fujimoto, you have just made the day for Ragnar by posting that link.
Quoted message said:
Casual Observer
This should really get him going.
Why is everyone so interested in the sex life of Raggy and his big
mama? Maybe if you guys were less interested in what floats his boat
and more into what floats yours, you might actually stand a chance of
one day getting laid.I know it sounds highly improbable but stranger things have happened.
-
Fujikawa Yamamoto said:
A lay is a lay, man. Of course, some are worth more "trouble" than
others, but I like big girls who know they're big and do what they can
to accentuate the positive. The ones I really feel sorry for are
those who only have double-chins and pot-bellies but no [censored] or ass!Of course, females in general are usually clueless, so the problem
with fat acceptance is that now we have the phenomenon of fat chicks
acting like daddy's little girls with tiaras, same as any [censored]
normal-sized princess. Yeeeecch!! -
"Prisoner at War" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Fujikawa Yamamoto said:
A lay is a lay, man. Of course, some are worth more "trouble" than
others, but I like big girls who know they're big and do what they can
to accentuate the positive. The ones I really feel sorry for are
those who only have double-chins and pot-bellies but no [censored] or ass!Of course, females in general are usually clueless, so the problem
with fat acceptance is that now we have the phenomenon of fat chicks
acting like daddy's little girls with tiaras, same as any [censored]
normal-sized princess. Yeeeecch!![censored] can be male or female, ya know. Tiaras are a useless bauble,
really, as is most jewelry. Just tends to get in the way. If anyone wants
to give me anything jewelry related, I'd rather have a share in the company
making the stuff than the stuff itself.
Fluffy materialistic [censored] can be any sex, size, color or age, even. So I
don't see how it's a fitness or fatness issue. -
Prisoner at War said:
Thing is, you kind of "understand" a blond bombshell being a [censored]
princess type -- you almost expect it. But it's not only ridiculous,
but grotesque, for a fat chick to put on such airs.B!tchy princess types had rich daddy give them everything... Or poor
daddy that did without so he could give her everything... Either way, she
thinks money is plastic, and easy to come by. Snooty snob that never had
to work for a dime.That can be seen around here where I live. I cannot count how many 16
year old kids (boys and girls) drive around in cars worth more then
$40K. They get in a wreck, that's ok, get a new car.Looks have nothing to do with it, "my $hit don't stink" attatude given to
them by parents who failed at their job is the fault. Fat, skinny, it
doesn't matter. I do, however, find it disturbing that you think skinny
"bombshells" are expected to be snobs, but fat girls aren't. In the Texas
towns that are across the river from Mexico, it's "white girls" that are
treated like royalty. Fat, skinny, doesn't matter. As long as she is
white, men throw money at them.Quoted message said:
I agree that jewelry is useless bauble -- but since the [censored] is a sex
object anyway, the jewelry only further objectifies her, like pretty
foil paper wrapping for eye candy....*laugh* If you only want a phuk toy, it would be better to get one of
those high dollar "solid" sex dolls that they have now. $1K up front, and
then she's yours to use and abuse as you see fit. She never has a
headache, never wants to talk afterwards, never b!tches about how you
never talk to her any more, and never wants jewelry. If they could cook
and do laundry, you wouldn't need a real one. Unless you want more out of
the thing you stick good 'ole "Mr Wiggles" into. -
Miaka Yuki said:
Your 80s supermodel body, I think, like
Kim Alexis or Christie Brinkley back in the day. Those ladies were built
like warrior princesses. Who doesn't like Xena?The acting sucked. The stories sucked. The entire plot line of the
series sucked. But I do admit, the outfits worn by the chicks were hot...
Ofcourse, I was one that thought the outfit would look better on a size
28. 😄 -
Prisoner at War said:
Of course, females in general are usually clueless, so the problem
with fat acceptance is that now we have the phenomenon of fat chicks
acting like daddy's little girls with tiaras, same as any [censored]
normal-sized princess. Yeeeecch!!If they can still get laid, even with the attatude from hell, what
business is it of yours? She is either doing something right to still get
attention, or she isn't getting any at all and she doesn't get any.
Either way, she gets what she deserves.As I said before, ANY woman, no matter how defective, can get a man,
provided she is good enough in the sack. If there is a line, then the
deal isn't that bad. -
Miaka Yuki said:
Well, you see I'm actually a gay man in woman's bodyWhy are all fat acceptors sexually depraved?
-
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, The Master <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Miaka Yuki said:
Your 80s supermodel body, I think, like
Kim Alexis or Christie Brinkley back in the day. Those ladies were built
like warrior princesses. Who doesn't like Xena?The acting sucked. The stories sucked. The entire plot line of the
series sucked. But I do admit, the outfits worn by the chicks were hot...
Ofcourse, I was one that thought the outfit would look better on a size 28. 😄That's because you have a sick fat fetish.
-
"> If they can still get laid, even with the attatude from hell, what
Quoted message said:
business is it of yours? She is either doing something right to still get
attention, or she isn't getting any at all and she doesn't get any. Either
way, she gets what she deserves.As I said before, ANY woman, no matter how defective, can get a man,
provided she is good enough in the sack. If there is a line, then the
deal isn't that bad.I guess it has more to do with charisma and possibly talent than anything.
But how much wasted potential bed talent gets missed all the time because
someone's looks or attitude is not to par. I mean, Beauty is in the eye of
the beer holder, right?This can go both ways. As much as I'd like for every male to be built like
the main characters from the Descendants of Darkness manga, I know it won't
happen, but I'm very happy with what I do have.We can look to the fantasy, but we have to live with the reality, and it's
never going to be pretty. -
(Kenny) said:
Miaka Yuki said:
Well, you see I'm actually a gay man in woman's body
Why are all fat acceptors sexually depraved?
LOL...I think it's kind of logical...misfits love company....
-
--
I like to drink martinis
Two at the very most.
Three, I'm under the table,
Four, I'm under my host.
-- Dorothy Parker"Kenny" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Miaka Yuki said:
Well, you see I'm actually a gay man in woman's bodyWhy are all fat acceptors sexually depraved?
You are such an idiot! I was trying to make a point.
I'm trying to say that even though I am a woman, I don't think like one, but
that I do love men! How depraved is that?
I'm not a drag queen! or a tranny. Been married to a Scottish redhead for
17 years now. We both know there are things wa can improve on, in all
aspects, but we are doing fine.
How long have you been married, Kenny? -
Prisoner at War said:
I don't know what you mean by "stereotype," I only know what's the
truth: females are very easy to sucker. Everyone knows this, even
females. They are not only physically weaker (typically), but
mentally easier to manipulate. Just the facts.I take it you never visited a strip club then... Because those "easy to
sucker" women make good money jiggling their [censored] for $20's from the
drooling men who aren't going to get any.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Guys will never give up on the need to breed. It's purely biological.
Well, not "breeding" per se, but sex.
And that will always mean that women in reality have the control. You are
complaining about the b!tchy princess tiara types, but if she's good in
the sack, men will be willing to take that kind of abuse. You think that
means the woman is easy to manipulate, but I think it means the men are.You see "buy the chick some stupid diamonds, and she will put out, what an
idiot".The women see "offer a little pu$$y, and get some expensive diamonds, men
are idiots".Who's right? Well, how much did the diamonds cost you? How much did the
sex cost her? Who REALLY got the better deal?Quoted message said:
A guy
simply finds a gal beautiful; females need to feel validated in their
choice of men, and there are many (basically silly) factors involved.And that is a failure on society for making girls put so much effort in
physical looks. Every girl wants to be a 110 or lighter model type. If
she's a size 5, she thinks she is fat and wants to lose 5 to 10 pounds.Or you have the larger girls who cannot even come close to that, can go
into depression and binge eat to help mask the feelings of self hate and
dread.That can be a sign of shallowness, but it's root cause is the very thing
that groups like s.s.f-a tries to fight against.Quoted message said:
*ANY* female who puts on make-up, etc., is making herself into a sex
object.And the men drool, give her attention, give her gifts, etc. A couple
bucks in make-up, a few giggles, and she has the office men wraped around
her finger. She may be objectifying herself, but that doesn't mean that
she will give it up. More proof of how easy men are to manipulate.Quoted message said:
*NO* female dresses up, etc., "only for herself"...one
clueless chick at the gym (one of the top five hottest women there)
told me she worked out only for herself, to look good for herself,
*after* she told me that summer was coming and she had to get in
shape!So SHE could get the attnetion from the clueless men who will drool all
over her, give her free drinks all night long at the night club, and not
have to sleep with any of them unless she wants to. -
On Oct 30, 8:23 pm, The Master <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
If they can still get laid, even with the attatude from hell, what
business is it of yours?Um, I'm just expressing my opinion on the matter, same as you
expressing yours on mine: this is usenet, you know?Quoted message said:
She is either doing something right to still get
attention, or she isn't getting any at all and she doesn't get any.
Either way, she gets what she deserves.That certainly is true: I do think people get what they "deserve,"
generally speaking.Quoted message said:
As I said before, ANY woman, no matter how defective, can get a man,
provided she is good enough in the sack.Any woman can "get" a man, but to keep him depends mainly on the sack,
yes, and a few other things.Quoted message said:
If there is a line, then the
deal isn't that bad.?
-
"Prisoner at War" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On Oct 30, 8:23 pm, The Master <[email hidden]>
wrote:
I changed the title of this thread since we've totally gotten off the track
about body sizes, let alone whale watching.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
If they can still get laid, even with the attatude from hell, what
business is it of yours?Um, I'm just expressing my opinion on the matter, same as you
expressing yours on mine: this is usenet, you know?Quoted message said:
She is either doing something right to still get
attention, or she isn't getting any at all and she doesn't get any.
Either way, she gets what she deserves.That certainly is true: I do think people get what they "deserve,"
generally speaking.Quoted message said:
As I said before, ANY woman, no matter how defective, can get a man,
provided she is good enough in the sack.Any woman can "get" a man, but to keep him depends mainly on the sack,
yes, and a few other things.
Having amazing bed talents can be a major plus, for both sexes, so long as
they can be open enough to explore the options. Zorastaran-based religions
(big 3 Judaism, Christanity, and Islam) and control has been the cause of
lots of lost talent and potential, especially for the female, who over the
centuries were just expected to take whatever was given to them, because it
was "God's will".
I'm going off the tangent here, and religion belongs in another newsgroup.
As I was saying, having amazing bedroom talents can pretty much keep a man
at home, and it's great when a man can get this kind of attention from the
woman of his choice, no matter what her size. She's a keeper, at least for
that one thing. But will that be enough to keep him from getting bored when
it comes time to take a road trip?
My husband and I have the most interesting conversations on those, ranging
from science to games to fiction, and so on.Sure, shallow gasheads, big or small are going to get the attention, because
that might be the only way to shut them up. If you guys who are lucky (?)
enough to seduce them get a good ride out them, then more power to you.As to you, PoW, make sure you're being safe, no matter who you take. The man
who can please any woman, no matter what her attitude or size is, is a rare
gem, and we'd hate to lose you. You see, I already got my rare gem. -
"Prisoner at War" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On Oct 30, 8:23 pm, The Master <[email hidden]>
wrote:
I changed the title of this thread since we've totally gotten off the track
about body sizes, let alone whale watching.Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
If they can still get laid, even with the attatude from hell, what
business is it of yours?Um, I'm just expressing my opinion on the matter, same as you
expressing yours on mine: this is usenet, you know?Quoted message said:
She is either doing something right to still get
attention, or she isn't getting any at all and she doesn't get any.
Either way, she gets what she deserves.That certainly is true: I do think people get what they "deserve,"
generally speaking.Quoted message said:
As I said before, ANY woman, no matter how defective, can get a man,
provided she is good enough in the sack.Any woman can "get" a man, but to keep him depends mainly on the sack,
yes, and a few other things.
Having amazing bed talents can be a major plus, for both sexes, so long as
they can be open enough to explore the options. Zorastaran-based religions
(big 3 Judaism, Christanity, and Islam) and control has been the cause of
lots of lost talent and potential, especially for the female, who over the
centuries were just expected to take whatever was given to them, because it
was "God's will".
I'm going off the tangent here, and religion belongs in another newsgroup.
As I was saying, having amazing bedroom talents can pretty much keep a man
at home, and it's great when a man can get this kind of attention from the
woman of his choice, no matter what her size. She's a keeper, at least for
that one thing. But will that be enough to keep him from getting bored when
it comes time to take a road trip?
My husband and I have the most interesting conversations on those, ranging
from science to games to fiction, and so on.Sure, shallow gasheads, big or small are going to get the attention, because
that might be the only way to shut them up. If you guys who are lucky (?)
enough to seduce them get a good ride out them, then more power to you.As to you, PoW, make sure you're being safe, no matter who you take. The man
who can please any woman, no matter what her attitude or size is, is a rare
gem, and we'd hate to lose you. You see, I already got my rare gem.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.