Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Cell vs Atomik

Started by danien · · Last activity · 11 posts · 5,815 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
19 October 2007
Last activity
19 October 2007
Original author
danien
Posts
11
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
5,815
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–11 of 11
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi all,
    Im in the market for a sub $500 mountain bike.
    Would prefer a softtail which therefore limits the options a bit.
    I have been looking at Cell Bikes DHX2
    cellbikes.com.aup 48 CELL DHX2 Full Suspension Townhill Bike
    and the Atomik Alpha
    atomik.com.aucycle alpha.htm

    Pros of the Atomik Alpha:
    -Better shocks front and back
    -Sexier looking bike
    -
    Pros of the Cell DHX2
    -Better shimano gear
    -Lighter
    -double crown fork

    If anyone has any comment on the specs of either one or has seen/ ridden these bikes I would appreciate your comments.

    regards
    Danien

  2. At that price range I would not consider purchasing a dually. Basically these bikes are made to look like down hill / trail bikes but on most occasions, have a sticker near the BB saying that they are not suitable for off road conditions 😄.

    Go to you local bike store and get fitted on a Giant hardtail. Better to get a bike that fits without disk brakes and has pedalling efficiency. If this is for commuting, then a hybrid / flat bar road bike would be the way to go.

    Good Luck.

  3. Definitely only a hardtail at that price, you'll regret any dual sus bike bought new for <$2000. I agree that a Giant would be a fair choice.

  4. you guys are killing me.
    I was hoping for someone to agree with me.
    Can someone explain exactly the problem with softtail at this price, without quoting the bad old days when every softtail was [censored]. What exactly is the extra $1500 buying me?

    Thanks for the prompt replies though.

    regards
    Danien

  5. danien said:

    What exactly is the extra $1500 buying me?

    A bike that won't fall apart and hurt you.

    Go the hardtail for that budget.

  6. At that price it will be very heavy and have poorly-damped, bobbing-prone, fragile rear suspension.

  7. poorly dampened? An RTS 500 is not to be sneezed at is it?

    Heavy? 15kg aint to bad is it?

  8. Being new to this forum I should behave, but can I ask a bolshy question:

    Have any of you guys actually ridden a sub $500 softtail in the last 6 months?

    regards

    Danien

  9. There is a reason that almost all dual sus frames have a dual pivot rear swing arm - this is to counterract pedal bob (and, allegedly, braking bob, but I've not seen them do that successfully). When it is done well, you can shove almost any rear shock in the frame and it will work well. If you want to use a single pivot swing arm, and you'd only do this if you wanted a really light bike or you were using an old frame that you couldn't part with, then you need a stable platform rear shock or you'll be stuck with a pogo stick of a bike.
    Both these bikes are single pivot designs. Neither has a stable platform shock. Ever seen a dual suspension huffy on the road? - up/down/up/down goes the rider as he trundles along. These bikes will behave like the huffy.
    If you get a good hardtail frame, you can upgrade it with better components as you go. The first thing that you'll want to replace with these bikes is the frame.
    Don't know anything about that shock other than that I can't find any reviews of it on the net and that it isn't Fox, Manitou, Rock Shox, Cane Creek, Magura or Marzocchi.

  10. danien said:

    Being new to this forum I should behave, but can I ask a bolshy question:

    Have any of you guys actually ridden a sub $500 softtail in the last 6 months?

    regards

    Danien


    I think that you know the answer to this question.

  11. danien said:

    Being new to this forum I should behave, but can I ask a bolshy question:

    Have any of you guys actually ridden a sub $500 softtail in the last 6 months?

    regards

    Danien

    No, but the design on those low end bikes haven't changed for the past 10 years. Put it this way, I find that the maestro system on my mtb could still be a lot better, and it is light years ahead of what is offered in those two examples. If your heart is set on getting one, then by all means purchase one. But you'll end up cursing the bike while you're on it after the initial euphoria. Let's face it, $500 can get you a deposit on a nice hardtail with Deore LX / Hone groupset which will ride circles around those bikes - in all environments!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.