Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

New jim beam claims

Started by Jambo · · Last activity · 88 posts · 1,486 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 September 2007
Last activity
27 September 2007
Original author
Jambo
Posts
88
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,486
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 88
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended "materials
    school".

    It's quite obvious from his posts that he's neither. His usage of
    terminologies that aren't used by metallurgists, his juvenile understanding
    of scientific methodologies, and the obviously made up experiences and
    contrived "data" he produces make all this clear.

    I'm struggling to find out what the payback is for you for this fraud,
    beamboy. Does it matter to you when you give bad advice to people here,
    most of whom, after all, are honestly seeking advice they're likely to use
    in real life, or is the notion that they may take your bad advice the reward
    for you, regardless that it serves them badly? Obviously you feel that you
    can get away with fraud since you have an anonymous presence in this n.g.,
    but what's the payback for bleating false information? Is acknowledgement
    of others that you're some sort of technical guru the payback itself? Maybe
    trying to be known as some sort of maverick, the "rebel" who rails against
    the system, is your kick, however misguided and wrong you may be? Is this
    what tickles your fancy? Or maybe you're living out in this newsgroup what
    you can't achieve in real life?

    Let's hear the real story, beamboy.

  2. Jambo' [email protected] said:

    Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended "materials
    school".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile

    http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html

  3. landotter said:
    Jambo' [email protected] said:

    Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended "materials
    school".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile

    http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html

    Even easier (No Download Required!): "No Likey, No Clickey", IOW, if
    their posts bug ya, don't read 'em.

  4. Ozark Bicycle said:
    landotter said:

    On Sep 16, 10:12 pm, "Jambo" <[email protected]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended "materials
    school".

    Quoted message said:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html

    Even easier (No Download Required!): "No Likey, No Clickey", IOW, if
    their posts bug ya, don't read 'em.

    That is my approach too. I just read what I want and skip what I
    don't. When I go to the library, I don't expect to only see the books
    that I want to read. I see lots of books by authors that I am not
    interested in. I don't pick them up and read them cause they are
    there.

    I remember when I was in K-12, in the olden times. They taught us to
    read a text selectively. You would scan through the text and focus on
    the things that you thought were relevant and important and skip what
    was not of value to you. It was a useful trick that I used during
    college with success and use in my daily life when I read, do
    research, etc. It works quite well. If I know that an author or
    subject does not appeal to me, I simply skip it. Yet, I have the
    option of having it available if I decide to read it later.

    I have the feeling that people don't learn this skill anymore. Being
    unable to skim through text and be selective, some may need
    killfiles.

    Andres

  5. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended "materials
    school".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile

    http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html

    Even easier (No Download Required!): "No Likey, No Clickey", IOW, if
    their posts bug ya, don't read 'em.

    Or simply respond in a fashion that isn't likely to elicit a flaming
    response. Instead of saying outright that someone's wrong, try to figure out
    how they came to their conclusion. Refrain from name-calling and swearing
    and whatever else is used, intentionally or otherwise, to push someone into
    a corner from which feel they need to fight their way out of, rather than
    consider that it's possible there's another angle they hadn't considered.

    And above all else, keep in mind that, when you're absolutely 100% certain
    of something, those are the times when it's most likely you're wrong. Hate
    it when that happens, but life goes a whole lot easier once you realize that
    eating bit of crow now & then is not such a bad thing in your diet.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

  6. corneille avec de la sauce à poire?

  7. Quoted message said:

    corneille avec de la sauce à poire?

    Oui. Sans oignons, svp. Recommanderiez-vous un vin rouge ou un blanc ?

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

  8. In article <[email hidden]>,

    landotter said:
    Jambo' [email protected] said:

    Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended
    "materials school".

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile

    http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html

    Works for me.

  9. Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    > re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended "materials
    > school".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile

    http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html


    Even easier (No Download Required!): "No Likey, No Clickey", IOW, if
    their posts bug ya, don't read 'em.

    Or simply respond in a fashion that isn't likely to elicit a flaming
    response. Instead of saying outright that someone's wrong, try to figure out
    how they came to their conclusion. Refrain from name-calling and swearing
    and whatever else is used, intentionally or otherwise, to push someone into
    a corner from which feel they need to fight their way out of, rather than
    consider that it's possible there's another angle they hadn't considered.

    I'm afraid that won't work in this context.

  10. juste les faits '65?

  11. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    corneille avec de la sauce à poire?

    Oui. Sans oignons, svp. Recommanderiez-vous un vin rouge ou un blanc ?

    Avec cette sauce et les oiseaux sauvages, je compte un cidre de Normande.

  12. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Or simply respond in a fashion that isn't likely to elicit a flaming
    response. Instead of saying outright that someone's wrong, try to figure
    out how they came to their conclusion. Refrain from name-calling and
    swearing and whatever else is used, intentionally or otherwise, to push
    someone into a corner from which feel they need to fight their way out
    of, rather than consider that it's possible there's another angle they
    hadn't considered.

    I'm afraid that won't work in this context.

    Then perhaps you should join in on our discussion of fine food & wine,
    graciously started by Datakoll? It's already taxing the limits of my French.

    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    "Peter Cole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    >> Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    >> re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended "materials
    >> school".
    > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile
    >
    > http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html
    Even easier (No Download Required!): "No Likey, No Clickey", IOW, if
    their posts bug ya, don't read 'em.

    Or simply respond in a fashion that isn't likely to elicit a flaming
    response. Instead of saying outright that someone's wrong, try to figure
    out how they came to their conclusion. Refrain from name-calling and
    swearing and whatever else is used, intentionally or otherwise, to push
    someone into a corner from which feel they need to fight their way out
    of, rather than consider that it's possible there's another angle they
    hadn't considered.

    I'm afraid that won't work in this context.

  13. Tim McNamara said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Mike Jacoubowsky said:
    Quoted message said:

    corneille avec de la sauce à poire?

    Oui. Sans oignons, svp. Recommanderiez-vous un vin rouge ou un blanc ?

    Avec cette sauce et les oiseaux sauvages, je compte un cidre de Normande.

    Beurk !

    Ça me donne envie de gerber ...

  14. On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:18:32 -0700, "Qui si parla

    Campagnolo-www.vecchios.com said:

    jb/dt/ts......gang of 3

    pc/ob.... gang of 2

  15. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    datakoll said:

    corneille avec de la sauce ? poire?

    A shot of Old Overholt.
    As Dooley Wilson tells us
    "It takes the sting out of being occupied."

    --
    Michael Press

  16. "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Or simply respond in a fashion that isn't likely to elicit a flaming
    response. Instead of saying outright that someone's wrong, try to


    figure

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    out how they came to their conclusion. Refrain from name-calling and
    swearing and whatever else is used, intentionally or otherwise, to


    push

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    someone into a corner from which feel they need to fight their way


    out

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of, rather than consider that it's possible there's another angle


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    hadn't considered.

    I'm afraid that won't work in this context.

    Then perhaps you should join in on our discussion of fine food & wine,
    graciously started by Datakoll? It's already taxing the limits of my


    French.

    Quoted message said:


    --Mike Jacoubowsky
    Chain Reaction Bicycles
    www.ChainReaction.com
    Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA

    "Peter Cole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Mike Jacoubowsky said:

    >>> Now beamboy has dropped the "former metallurgist" claim, and has
    >>> re-classified himself as a "metallurgist" who has attended


    "materials

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >>> school".
    >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killfile
    >>
    >> http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html
    > Even easier (No Download Required!): "No Likey, No Clickey", IOW, if
    > their posts bug ya, don't read 'em.

    Or simply respond in a fashion that isn't likely to elicit a flaming
    response. Instead of saying outright that someone's wrong, try to


    figure

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    out how they came to their conclusion. Refrain from name-calling and
    swearing and whatever else is used, intentionally or otherwise, to


    push

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    someone into a corner from which feel they need to fight their way


    out

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of, rather than consider that it's possible there's another angle


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    hadn't considered.

    I'm afraid that won't work in this context.

    Just pour the friggin plunk mate!

    Chas.

  17. * * Chas said:


    In the US Metallurgists almost always have engineering degrees and
    frequently advanced degrees in the field.

    I was pointing out, by implication, that there are other (and
    sometimes better) ways to build knowledge than by getting an academic
    degree in something.

    Chalo

  18. Chalo said:
    * * Chas said:


    In the US Metallurgists almost always have engineering degrees and
    frequently advanced degrees in the field.

    I was pointing out, by implication, that there are other (and
    sometimes better) ways to build knowledge than by getting an academic
    degree in something.

    Chalo

    Including frequent use of insults and vulgarity on usenet?

  19. again, this is possible: Jambo is Beam. Beam also appears with other
    email address and ID. The entire post is "Beam's" construction to
    amuse himself by controlling yawl.

  20. datakoll said:

    again, this is possible: Jambo is Beam. Beam also appears with other
    email address and ID. The entire post is "Beam's" construction to
    amuse himself by controlling yawl.

    Actually, it Jambo posts prolifically with several different
    identities, in different groups and in other languages. He is been
    posting for a long time. Beam doesn't seem to post as much and has
    been posting under his current name since 2006.

    Both have too much time.

    Andres

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.