Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

I ride my bicycle to ride my bicycle

Started by Doug Taylor · · Last activity · 25 posts · 742 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 August 2007
Last activity
1 September 2007
Original author
Doug Taylor
Posts
25
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
742
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 25
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. But others may have ulterior motives:

  2. Doug Taylor said:

    But others may have ulterior motives:

    I believe her saddle position is much too high causing her hips to
    rock. She seems to be in terrible discomfort, poor thing.

  3. Doug Taylor said:

    But others may have ulterior motives:

    She needs a stationary trainer.

  4. Per landotter:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It's gotta be part of an advertisement for something or other.

    Anybody know what?
    --
    PeteCresswell

  5. In article <[email hidden]>, Doug Taylor

    Quoted message said:

    But others may have ulterior motives:

    Well so much for the two minute drill, she finished in about a minute!
    Why the rush?

  6. Luke wrote:
    :: In article <[email hidden]>, Doug Taylor
    :: <[email hidden]> wrote:
    ::
    ::: But others may have ulterior motives:
    :::
    :::


    ::
    :: Well so much for the two minute drill, she finished in about a
    :: minute! Why the rush?

    Didn't you see that traffic light?

  7. Doug Taylor said:

    But others may have ulterior motives:

    Love it! I just want to know, what was that comment from the passenger in
    the car?

    Something along the lines of the matronly woman in "when Harry Met Sally"
    "I'll have whatever she's having" perhaps?

  8. Doug Taylor said:

    But others may have ulterior motives:

    It exposes one danger for those seeking the true bicycle path.

    Had she been riding as street traffic her mind would have been unable
    to lose focus.

    Certainly she exhibited the perfect connectedness between ones
    inner-self and their machine and the rhythm of the road.

    But, this student wasn't mindful of being in the outer world.

    The lamp post abruptly taught her that lesson and she was immediately
    enlightened.

    It's always amazing the way a bicycle can transport you to places
    you'd least expected.
    --
    zk

  9. "Zoot Katz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    The lamp post abruptly taught her that lesson and she was immediately
    enlightened.

    Nice pun.

  10. Doug Taylor said:

    But others may have ulterior motives:

    All that hair causes excess drag, and she need clipless pedals to keep
    her feet attached.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    A Real Cyclist [TM] keeps at least one bicycle in the bedroom.

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  11. Bill Sornson said:
    (PeteCresswell) said:

    Per landotter:

    Quoted message said:

    >

    Didn't Doug Taylor post that? (I plonked him AND the land-rat, so only
    going by Andre's reply.)

    Quoted message said:

    It's gotta be part of an advertisement for something or other.

    Anybody know what?

    Inappropriate posting to Usenet newsgroups? (There was also the "[censored]
    saddle" a few weeks ago, equally if not more unsuitable for a public forum.)

    Whatever...

    Why is sex bad and violence good in USian culture?

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    A Real Cyclist [TM] keeps at least one bicycle in the bedroom.

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  12. Bill Sornson said:

    Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Would you send this video -- or the much more explicit [censored] one -- to your
    boss or clients or co-workers?

    Some bosses I've had would have sent it to me. Lighten up bill,
    there's worse things in this world - even this forum - to worry about
    than some chick getting 'bicycle smile'. Take the racism posts for
    example. A link to a youtube video has you upset, yet you're willing
    to put up with hate-speech posts? Get over it, learn to laugh once in
    a while, ya buzzkill.

  13. zencycle said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    Tom "Johnny Sunset" Sherman wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    Would you send this video -- or the much more explicit [censored] one --
    to your boss or clients or co-workers?

    Some bosses I've had would have sent it to me. Lighten up bill,
    there's worse things in this world - even this forum - to worry about
    than some chick getting 'bicycle smile'. Take the racism posts for
    example. A link to a youtube video has you upset, yet you're willing
    to put up with hate-speech posts? Get over it, learn to laugh once in
    a while, ya buzzkill.

    A) I'm not upset. B) If you hadn't DELETED the context, I simply made a
    quip about what "category" the post belonged. C) Not sure what hate-speech
    posts you seem to think I "put up with" -- there's a lot to /ignore/ on this
    and other newsgroups; I probably did just that.

    Otherwise, your anonymous snipe was spot-on.

    BS

  14. Bill 'Sorni' Sornson said:
    Tom 'Johnny Sunset' Sherman said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    (PeteCresswell) wrote:
    > Per landotter:
    >>>


    Didn't Doug Taylor post that? (I plonked him AND the land-rat, so
    only going by Andre's reply.)

    > It's gotta be part of an advertisement for something or other.
    >
    > Anybody know what?
    Inappropriate posting to Usenet newsgroups? (There was also the
    "[censored] saddle" a few weeks ago, equally if not more unsuitable for a
    public forum.) Whatever...

    Quoted message said:

    Why is sex bad and violence good in USian culture?

    Would you send this video -- or the much more explicit [censored] one -- to your
    boss or clients or co-workers?

    I would NOT be offended if someone sent this video to me. However, I
    would be offended if someone sent me a violent video with the intent to
    be humorous.

    I would not send ANYTHING non-work related with my work email account.

    Quoted message said:

    Otherwise, nice troll.

    No, it is silly for anyone to be offended by the video that is the topic
    of this thread.

    Maybe Sorni was offended by the woman not wearing a foam bicycle hat? 😉

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    A Real Cyclist [TM] keeps at least one bicycle in the bedroom.

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  15. On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:24:32 -0700, "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    (PeteCresswell) said:

    Per landotter:

    Quoted message said:

    >

    Didn't Doug Taylor post that? (I plonked him AND the land-rat, so only
    going by Andre's reply.)

    Quoted message said:

    It's gotta be part of an advertisement for something or other.

    Anybody know what?

    Inappropriate posting to Usenet newsgroups? (There was also the "[censored]
    saddle" a few weeks ago, equally if not more unsuitable for a public forum.)

    Whatever...

    Hey Billy Club: Get over yourself, why don't you? Else we might
    wonder if you are just another repressed Larry Craig or Tom Foley.

  16. Tom 'Johnny Sunset' Sherman said:

    Bill "Sorni" Sornson wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Tell you what: ask ANY of the shop owners on these newsgroups if
    they'd send either video out to their mailing lists. Guess what? They
    WOULDN'T, because many of their customers would not appreciate
    being sent something like that without warning or consent.

    Quoted message said:

    So?

    TYVM.

  17. me schrieb am Dienstag, 28. August 2007 04:10:

    Quoted message said:
    Doug Taylor said:

    But others may have ulterior motives:

    Love it! I just want to know, what was that comment from the passenger in
    the car?

    The old woman says: "The next time we take our bicycle again"

    Quoted message said:

    Something along the lines of the matronly woman in "when Harry Met Sally"
    "I'll have whatever she's having" perhaps?

    --
    Kurt Isane

  18. Bill Sornson said:

    ISTR an uproar about some cycling rag cover photo or inside spread a
    few years ago.

    Actually, I think it was a "suggestive" ad of some sort.

    Whatever...

  19. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Bill Sornson said:
    Bill Sornson said:

    ISTR an uproar about some cycling rag cover photo or inside spread
    a few years ago.

    Actually, I think it was a "suggestive" ad of some sort.

    Whatever...

    At the risk of inappropriateness, I remember getting a (IIRC) Bike
    Warehouse catalog back when I was in high school. On one of the pages
    there was a picture of an attractive woman holding a Campy seatpost with
    the caption "grease before insertion." Even at 16 the innuendo was
    glaringly obvious. Sex (or implied sex) sells.

  20. Tim McNamara said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Marz said:
    Bill Sornson said:


    Let me try one last thing. Say Claire was reading the NG and
    clicked on the link. No big deal (I doubt she'd be offended or
    even taken aback; or maybe she might. be). Now say she was sitting
    with her 10-year-old daughter reading the NG and clicked on the
    link. PERHAPS she might not appreciate her daughter seeing that
    without some warning or advisory; and PERHAPS she'd wait to click
    on it until her daughter wasn't with her (or just not click on it
    at all).

    Maybe you'd want your kid to see an explicit [censored] VIDEO in a
    cycling newsgroup. I'd bet a lot of parents wouldn't, and WOULD
    want to be told in advance what the content was.

    Just because an article posted here could or may offend someone does
    not make it inappropriate for a public forum such as
    rec.bicycles.tech.

    While I was not offended by the video, which I saw through a link in
    an entirely different forum than this newsgroup, I think it would
    have been courteous and common sense to warn that the content of the
    video was slightly salacious in nature (and a bit silly- the myth of
    sexual gratification from a bike saddle has been around for well over
    100 years- perhaps Carl with his mastery of Google searches can find
    us some 19th century "hygienic" saddles to look at. Here's an
    encapsulated history (no salacious images or videos but some frank
    terminology)):

    http://www.mothernature.com/Library/Bookshelf/Books/51/7.cfm

    If it really worked, bicycling would be *much* more popular among
    women then among men.

    I think it would be reasonable to expect that some of our co-readers
    in r.b.t might not want to watch such a video without some advance
    notice of the content. I haven't seen the "[censored] video" to which
    Bill refers and doubt that I have missed much, but I would hope that
    whomever posted it would have the courtesy to flag the video for what
    it was. A TinyURL masks all information about what the link
    contains, after all, so r.b.t readers cannot easily judge for
    themselves whether or not they want to click
    www.videos.com/cute-blonde-gets-off-on-her-bike-saddle.mpg because
    they just don't get that data.

    We already have enough gratuitous incivility in r.b.t that we don't
    need to sandbag people. Bill isn't asking for self-censorship, just a
    modicum of courtesy. I don't think that's so unreasonable.

    Holy [censored]! Thank you.

    Bill "even when I forward dirty stuff to friends I always let 'em know it's
    'adult-ish' or to 'open discreetly'" S.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.