Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Why does a spoke get "loose"?

Started by Colin Campbell · · Last activity · 30 posts · 1,462 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 August 2007
Last activity
19 August 2007
Original author
Colin Campbell
Posts
30
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,462
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 30
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

  2. Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    It gets loose because, well, it already is loose.

    If it's not under sufficient tension, each revolution will cause the
    spoke to go completely slack, and when it's unweighted, the re-
    tensioning is like an impact wrench, pounding the nipple looser and
    looser.

    Two main schools of thought here:

    1) have the entire wheel brought up to higher tension. To do that, a
    tensiometer and the manufacturer's spec for the rim are needed, so you
    don't risk damaging the rim.

    2) use a spoke compound, like the DT/Loctite one, or Wheelsmith Spoke
    Prep, to lock the threads in place.

    The adherents to each method are zealous in their proclamations that
    the other side is wrong, so prepare for the flame wars to begin.

  3. Hank Wirtz said:

    2) use a spoke compound, like the DT/Loctite one, or Wheelsmith Spoke
    Prep, to lock the threads in place.

    Or some linseed oil, tung oil, or similar if you've got them handy. I
    suspect hair gel might even work--but it takes forever to dry. Aqua-
    Net for installing grips, of course.

    Quoted message said:


    The adherents to each method are zealous in their proclamations that
    the other side is wrong, so prepare for the flame wars to begin.

    All I know is that wheels with the tension dialed in on the high side
    stay true, regardless of whether ya dip the threads in dippety doo or
    nothing at all.

  4. Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    Most commonly what happens is that a spoke nipple can gradually work
    it's way looser and looser during moments when forces on the wheel
    completely unload the tension on the spoke. Poorly built wheels are
    extremely prone to this while well-built ones can be immune or near-
    immune to it. Left spokes on typical modern rear derailer wheels are
    generally at low tension and prone to loosening like this sometimes;
    there are various techniques used to remedy this such as not lubing
    those spokes' threads, using a threadlocking compound, offset rims,
    etc.

    What probably happened in your case is that the spoke initially got
    loose for this reason, but now it's winding up (
    http://sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html#torsion ) each time you try to
    tighten it, which is why it's getting loose again so fast. I would
    follow Sheldon's instructions on that link.

  5. Hank Wirtz said:
    Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    It gets loose because, well, it already is loose.

    If it's not under sufficient tension, each revolution will cause the
    spoke to go completely slack, and when it's unweighted, the re-
    tensioning is like an impact wrench, pounding the nipple looser and
    looser.

    Two main schools of thought here:

    1) have the entire wheel brought up to higher tension. To do that, a
    tensiometer and the manufacturer's spec for the rim are needed, so you
    don't risk damaging the rim.

    2) use a spoke compound, like the DT/Loctite one, or Wheelsmith Spoke
    Prep, to lock the threads in place.

    The adherents to each method are zealous in their proclamations that
    the other side is wrong, so prepare for the flame wars to begin.


    So, do you mean it probably was faulty when the bike was delivered? (I
    don't know whether the LBS checked the wheel when they received it from
    Trek, or even whether they are supposed to need to do so.)

    The wheels have surprised me with their durability. I weighed about 88
    kg (190+ pounds) when the bike was delivered, and I've had enough wheel
    problems over the past 23 years that I think of myself as somewhat "hard
    on wheels". My older Trek has Campy / DT Swiss / Mavic 32 spoke wheels
    built for an even older bike, and weighs a bit more than a pound more
    than the new bike.

    I have lost nearly 10 kg in the past several months, though, and it's
    been during this period I've noticed the loose spoke! Maybe I should
    carry some weights when I ride?!?

  6. Hank Wirtz said:
    Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    Quoted message said:

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    Quoted message said:

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    It gets loose because, well, it already is loose.

    If it's not under sufficient tension, each revolution will cause the
    spoke to go completely slack, and when it's unweighted, the re-
    tensioning is like an impact wrench, pounding the nipple looser and
    looser.

    Two main schools of thought here:

    1) have the entire wheel brought up to higher tension. To do that, a
    tensiometer and the manufacturer's spec for the rim are needed, so you
    don't risk damaging the rim.

    2) use a spoke compound, like the DT/Loctite one, or Wheelsmith Spoke
    Prep, to lock the threads in place.

    The adherents to each method are zealous in their proclamations that
    the other side is wrong, so prepare for the flame wars to begin.

    It's one left side spoke on a wheel that's stayed true for a year of
    riding. That's not perfect but it's pretty good and not cause to do
    anything major. Increasing the whole wheel's tension is only viable if
    the rim could take much more tension at all from the right spokes,
    which it probably can't given that this is a high-end 24-spoke wheel
    that's held together. Thread compound isn't any more necessary than
    when the bike was new; the repeated loosenings are almost certainly
    due to windup, which can happen even at low tensions if you aren't
    watching for it, if there's corrosion, etc.

  7. Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again. When
    I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again I
    tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    either it's getting unscrewed or something's yielding. leaning another
    bike so that a pedal digs a spoke can do the job. likewise rim cracking
    or hub hole failure.

    suggest you:
    1. check componentry
    2. apply a little thread locker
    3. "stress relieve" to remove all wind-up, and
    4. make sure there's no sabotage, inadvertent or otherwise.

  8. Nate Knutson said:
    Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    Most commonly what happens is that a spoke nipple can gradually work
    it's way looser and looser during moments when forces on the wheel
    completely unload the tension on the spoke. Poorly built wheels are
    extremely prone to this while well-built ones can be immune or near-
    immune to it. Left spokes on typical modern rear derailer wheels are
    generally at low tension and prone to loosening like this sometimes;
    there are various techniques used to remedy this such as not lubing
    those spokes' threads, using a threadlocking compound, offset rims,
    etc.

    What probably happened in your case is that the spoke initially got
    loose for this reason, but now it's winding up (
    http://sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html#torsion ) each time you try to
    tighten it, which is why it's getting loose again so fast. I would
    follow Sheldon's instructions on that link.


    OK, good point. Luckily, the spokes are flat bladed (which is no doubt
    why I'm SOOO fast!), so I could check for torsion. I just went out and
    overtightened the spoke (I think), then loosened it a bit. I did not
    observe any twisting in the flat portion of the spoke.

    I'll see if that helps the spoke stay in place.

  9. Hank Wirtz said:
    Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    Quoted message said:

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    Quoted message said:

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    It gets loose because, well, it already is loose.

    If it's not under sufficient tension, each revolution will cause the
    spoke to go completely slack, and when it's unweighted, the re-
    tensioning is like an impact wrench, pounding the nipple looser and
    looser.

    Two main schools of thought here:

    1) have the entire wheel brought up to higher tension. To do that, a
    tensiometer and the manufacturer's spec for the rim are needed, so you
    don't risk damaging the rim.

    2) use a spoke compound, like the DT/Loctite one, or Wheelsmith Spoke
    Prep, to lock the threads in place.

    The adherents to each method are zealous in their proclamations that
    the other side is wrong, so prepare for the flame wars to begin.

    Another option is to lace the non-drive side in a 0 cross pattern
    (radial). Then when the chain pulls the hub, it tightens all the
    spokes and does not unload the spokes being pushed.
    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html#half-radial

  10. Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    Wheel/rim deformed there(bent) and the action of riding causes it to
    looen and perhaps to break.

  11. quote=''On Aug 12 said:
    Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    Quoted message said:

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    Quoted message said:

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    It gets loose because, well, it already is loose.

    If it's not under sufficient tension, each revolution will cause the
    spoke to go completely slack, and when it's unweighted, the re-
    tensioning is like an impact wrench, pounding the nipple looser and
    looser.

    Two main schools of thought here:

    1) have the entire wheel brought up to higher tension. To do that, a
    tensiometer and the manufacturer's spec for the rim are needed, so you
    don't risk damaging the rim.

    2) use a spoke compound, like the DT/Loctite one, or Wheelsmith Spoke
    Prep, to lock the threads in place.

    The adherents to each method are zealous in their proclamations that
    the other side is wrong, so prepare for the flame wars to begin.

    Another option is to lace the non-drive side in a 0 cross pattern
    (radial). Then when the chain pulls the hub, it tightens all the
    spokes and does not unload the spokes being pushed.
    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/wheelbuild.html#half-radial[/QUOTE]
    The wheel is already radially laced on the left side.
    As Peter said, the wheel may have damage (and/or the nipple thread may be worn) and this allows the nipple to easily back off when subjected to dynamic loads of riding.

  12. Colin Campbell said:

    Luckily, the spokes are flat bladed (which is no doubt
    why I'm SOOO fast!), so I could check for torsion. I just went out and
    overtightened the spoke (I think), then loosened it a bit. I did not
    observe any twisting in the flat portion of the spoke.

    If the same spoke is loosening each time, and it's not due to windup,
    and the problem spoke is at the same tension as all the other left
    side spokes, then possibly there's a flat spot on the rim.

    Pluck each of the spokes and listen to the pitch. All the spokes on a
    given side should produce the same pitch (indicating equal tension),
    and the wheel should be true and round. If you can't get it true with
    uniform spoke tension, the rim is probably warped or dinged.

  13. Art Harris said:
    Colin Campbell said:

    Luckily, the spokes are flat bladed (which is no doubt
    why I'm SOOO fast!), so I could check for torsion. I just went out and
    overtightened the spoke (I think), then loosened it a bit. I did not
    observe any twisting in the flat portion of the spoke.

    If the same spoke is loosening each time, and it's not due to windup,
    and the problem spoke is at the same tension as all the other left
    side spokes, then possibly there's a flat spot on the rim.

    Pluck each of the spokes and listen to the pitch. All the spokes on a
    given side should produce the same pitch (indicating equal tension),
    and the wheel should be true and round. If you can't get it true with
    uniform spoke tension, the rim is probably warped or dinged.


    I'll check that out. Thanks!

  14. On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:09:23 -0700, Colin Campbell
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:

    I have lost nearly 10 kg in the past several months

    That's impressively fast - what was your method?

  15. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Colin Campbell said:

    I have a 2006 Trek 5200 with the Bontrager Race Lite wheels. I upgraded
    the componentry to Campy Record, and Trek exchanged the wheels fro
    Shimano to Campy compatible at no cost. The wheels are 20 spokes front,
    24 rear, and the rear is laced two cross on the drive side, radially on
    the non-drive side.

    I now have about 8500 km (5300 miles) on the bike. Recently, I noticed
    that the rear wheel was a bit out of true. I checked, and one spoke on
    the non-drive side was quite loose. I tightened it up to something like
    the tension of the other spokes, and rode it some more. The next time I
    cleaned the bike, the spoke was loose again. I tightened it again.
    When I cleaned the bike on Friday, the spoke was loose again, and again
    I tightened it. I rode the bike 67 km on Saturday, and today I checked
    the spoke - it seemed a little less tight than the neighboring spokes.

    What causes this to happen? Do I need to take it to the shop? The bike
    is one year old later this month, by the way.

    Is there a flat spot in the rim at the loose spoke? By
    flat I mean even a little less round than the rest of
    the rim. That would give lower tension on that one
    spoke.

    Another possibility: The threads may have been
    originally treated with glue, and the glue on that one
    spoke has lost its grip.

    --
    Michael Press

  16. Andrew Price said:

    On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:09:23 -0700, Colin Campbell
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:

    I have lost nearly 10 kg in the past several months

    That's impressively fast - what was your method?


    Truthfully, I don't know. I retired in June of 2004, and stepped up my
    riding from about 7,500 miles to 10,000 miles annually. I go to the gym
    four afternoons a week, but I had not lost weight, just traded some fat
    for muscle.

    I started when I learned in mid-March that my high school reunion would
    be at the end of April. I dropped five pounds by then (about a pound a
    week). I had been riding every day for 90 days up to late April; then
    we drove from So Cal to Dallas and back, so I only rode a couple of
    times for a week. I tried to cut back on desserts, and maybe eat a bit
    less at each meal.

    When we got back home, I started riding every day again, and continued
    to lose weight. I got roped in to some long rides - a 70 mile organized
    fiasco, a ride to San Diego (which actually ended in Solana Beach when
    we all wanted lunch more than we wanted to climb Torrey Pines), helping
    friends train for a century that is being held this coming weekend, etc.
    I did four 300 mile weeks in five (and 290 miles the fifth week).

    I've now ridden 104 consecutive days since May 2. About six weeks ago,
    the weight loss and an increased regimen of core exercises started
    showing up in my riding. I could climb better, I could go harder for
    longer, I could close gaps just by telling my legs to do so. Naturally,
    this led me to ride even more.

    I find now that my appetite and eating capacity have both decreased.
    Last week, I couldn't eat all of a breakfast that I've treated myself to
    for years. I'm generally eating a little better than I used to, less
    cheese, more bananas, etc.

    So I guess the simple answer is "Ride more, eat less."

  17. Colin Campbell said:
    Andrew Price said:

    On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:09:23 -0700, Colin Campbell
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have lost nearly 10 kg in the past several months

    Quoted message said:

    That's impressively fast - what was your method?

    Truthfully, I don't know. I retired in June of 2004, and stepped up my
    riding from about 7,500 miles to 10,000 miles annually.

    Bing, bing, bing, we have a winner!!!

    I go to the gym

    Quoted message said:

    four afternoons a week, but I had not lost weight, just traded some fat
    for muscle.

    I started when I learned in mid-March that my high school reunion would
    be at the end of April. I dropped five pounds by then (about a pound a
    week). I had been riding every day for 90 days up to late April; then
    we drove from So Cal to Dallas and back, so I only rode a couple of
    times for a week. I tried to cut back on desserts, and maybe eat a bit
    less at each meal.

    When we got back home, I started riding every day again, and continued
    to lose weight. I got roped in to some long rides - a 70 mile organized
    fiasco, a ride to San Diego (which actually ended in Solana Beach when
    we all wanted lunch more than we wanted to climb Torrey Pines), helping
    friends train for a century that is being held this coming weekend, etc.
    I did four 300 mile weeks in five (and 290 miles the fifth week).

    I've now ridden 104 consecutive days since May 2. About six weeks ago,
    the weight loss and an increased regimen of core exercises started
    showing up in my riding. I could climb better, I could go harder for
    longer, I could close gaps just by telling my legs to do so. Naturally,
    this led me to ride even more.

    I find now that my appetite and eating capacity have both decreased.
    Last week, I couldn't eat all of a breakfast that I've treated myself to
    for years. I'm generally eating a little better than I used to, less
    cheese, more bananas, etc.

    So I guess the simple answer is "Ride more, eat less."

  18. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Colin Campbell said:
    Andrew Price said:

    On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:09:23 -0700, Colin Campbell
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:

    I have lost nearly 10 kg in the past several months

    That's impressively fast - what was your method?


    Truthfully, I don't know. I retired in June of 2004, and stepped up my
    riding from about 7,500 miles to 10,000 miles annually. I go to the gym
    four afternoons a week, but I had not lost weight, just traded some fat
    for muscle.

    I started when I learned in mid-March that my high school reunion would
    be at the end of April. I dropped five pounds by then (about a pound a
    week). I had been riding every day for 90 days up to late April; then
    we drove from So Cal to Dallas and back, so I only rode a couple of
    times for a week. I tried to cut back on desserts, and maybe eat a bit
    less at each meal.

    When we got back home, I started riding every day again, and continued
    to lose weight. I got roped in to some long rides - a 70 mile organized
    fiasco, a ride to San Diego (which actually ended in Solana Beach when
    we all wanted lunch more than we wanted to climb Torrey Pines), helping
    friends train for a century that is being held this coming weekend, etc.
    I did four 300 mile weeks in five (and 290 miles the fifth week).

    I've now ridden 104 consecutive days since May 2. About six weeks ago,
    the weight loss and an increased regimen of core exercises started
    showing up in my riding. I could climb better, I could go harder for
    longer, I could close gaps just by telling my legs to do so. Naturally,
    this led me to ride even more.

    I find now that my appetite and eating capacity have both decreased.
    Last week, I couldn't eat all of a breakfast that I've treated myself to
    for years. I'm generally eating a little better than I used to, less
    cheese, more bananas, etc.

    So I guess the simple answer is "Ride more, eat less."

    Thanks for the lucid account. No overnight change. The
    change is cumulative. Then, overnight, you see the
    change.

    I too decided to step up (a one inch step) the effort I
    put into riding. After a long while I "suddenly" had a
    lot more that I could easily put into turning the
    cranks.

    As to diet, you should never feel deprived. Always
    avail yourself of treats. A treat is not conditional;
    no "earning" a treat.

    --
    Michael Press

  19. Michael Press of Possum Lodge said:

    ...
    As to diet, you should never feel deprived. Always
    avail yourself of treats. A treat is not conditional;
    no "earning" a treat.

    Nonsense. If there is something a person wants, generally it is bad
    and/or immoral. If in doubt, do not take the action.

    --
    Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
    "I didn't expect a kind of Spanish Inquisition"

    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  20. Michael Press said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Colin Campbell said:
    Andrew Price said:

    On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:09:23 -0700, Colin Campbell
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    [---]

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > I have lost nearly 10 kg in the past several months

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    That's impressively fast - what was your method?


    Truthfully, I don't know. I retired in June of 2004, and stepped up my
    riding from about 7,500 miles to 10,000 miles annually. I go to the gym
    four afternoons a week, but I had not lost weight, just traded some fat
    for muscle.

    Quoted message said:

    I started when I learned in mid-March that my high school reunion would
    be at the end of April. I dropped five pounds by then (about a pound a
    week). I had been riding every day for 90 days up to late April; then
    we drove from So Cal to Dallas and back, so I only rode a couple of
    times for a week. I tried to cut back on desserts, and maybe eat a bit
    less at each meal.

    Quoted message said:

    When we got back home, I started riding every day again, and continued
    to lose weight. I got roped in to some long rides - a 70 mile organized
    fiasco, a ride to San Diego (which actually ended in Solana Beach when
    we all wanted lunch more than we wanted to climb Torrey Pines), helping
    friends train for a century that is being held this coming weekend, etc.
    I did four 300 mile weeks in five (and 290 miles the fifth week).

    Quoted message said:

    I've now ridden 104 consecutive days since May 2. About six weeks ago,
    the weight loss and an increased regimen of core exercises started
    showing up in my riding. I could climb better, I could go harder for
    longer, I could close gaps just by telling my legs to do so. Naturally,
    this led me to ride even more.

    Quoted message said:

    I find now that my appetite and eating capacity have both decreased.
    Last week, I couldn't eat all of a breakfast that I've treated myself to
    for years. I'm generally eating a little better than I used to, less
    cheese, more bananas, etc.

    Quoted message said:

    So I guess the simple answer is "Ride more, eat less."

    Thanks for the lucid account. No overnight change. The
    change is cumulative. Then, overnight, you see the
    change.

    Lots of 'us' wish to retire, at least I know I do...I've 'retired'
    once from the USN, but into another 'job'..I do wish for days where
    the big event is to ride, followed by other things...maybe I'm just
    reacting to 'retail', after a long summer....

    Quoted message said:


    I too decided to step up (a one inch step) the effort I
    put into riding. After a long while I "suddenly" had a
    lot more that I could easily put into turning the
    cranks.

    As to diet, you should never feel deprived. Always
    avail yourself of treats. A treat is not conditional;
    no "earning" a treat.

    --
    Michael Press

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.