On Jun 6, 10:39 pm, "L. Credit Where Due T." <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:REG said:You're right, of course. It wasn't a 'rant' from Bill, and on that tiny
technicality Charlie was wrong. But it was just another sanctimonious
exercise from Bill. I wish that Charlie had just said to Bill that he (Bill)
was too much of a nerd for Charlie to bother with, and that the idea that
Charlie owed Bill an explanation of anything was a figment of Bill's
imagination. That would have been sufficient, and accurate.Pluperfectly accurate, actually.
Quoted message said:It would also have been nice, of course, if Ken had come down off the fence
and made some statement about Bill's unwarranted passive-aggressive baiting
of Charlie, but maybe Ken thought it was obvious enough that it didn't need
comment.One would like to believe that was so, but ken's none-too-subtle
remarks have clearly and repeatedly shown his approval of whatever
needless nonsense bilious kazzyMerde spews..Richard GarmiseThe sanctimony shared and perpetuated by them and by their few cohorts
is of a thickness commensurate with their fatuous, fat skulls. Alas.Quoted message said:"jrw" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted message said:news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:On Jun 6, 6:18 pm, Leporello <[email hidden]> wrote:
> On 6 Jun, 11:01, wkasimer <[email hidden]> wrote:Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > On Jun 5, 11:57 am, Leporello <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > >Now...question.....If someone breaks the truce..will you yell at
> > >him..or will you join in and not be able to keep to the pledge....Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > The real questions are these:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > When someone takes issue with the substance of one of your "operatic
> > postings", are you going to interpret that as "breaking the truce"?Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > When someone else "breaks the truce", as will certainly happen at some
> > point, will you be able to control yourself and ignore it? With a few
> > obvious exceptions, the vast majority of RMO members seem quite
> > capable of ignoring your instigations; is there some reason why you
> > can't ignore the instigations of others? Or doesn't that standard
> > apply to you?Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> > Bill
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> I AM SO GLAD TO READ THIS NASTY RANT OF ONE OF THE PRIME INSTIGATORS
> OF THE TROUBLE...IT AGAIN PROVES THAT NO MATTER WHAT I SAY OR DO..THE
> SAME REACTION FROM THE SAME PEOPLE...GOOOD.....NOW THE REST OF US SEE
> HIM FOR WHAT HE ALWAYS WAS....Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> AS DON PAOLO SAYS...WHAT IS THE USE???????????????????????????????????
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:Far from a rant... Not one insulting comment there. Rather than
shouting, why not try answering in the same tone?- Hide quoted text -Quoted message said:- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -