Yet another breach of procedures by the infamous LNDD lab who have still not learnt any lessons about leaking results. But then when there are no penalties on them for doing so why would they bother?
Yet another breach of procedures by the infamous LNDD lab who have still not learnt any lessons about leaking results. But then when there are no penalties on them for doing so why would they bother?
Tony
You are just making excuses for professional bike riders who use drugs in their bodies to earn money
I believe the laboratory should be ordained , under international law, to disclose all test made within a very very short period -- a day, 2 days at the outside
Drug enhanced performances are obviously a big problem in "SPORT" ( but it isn't sport is it).
-- Trevor A Panther In South Yorkshire, England, United Kingdom. www.tapan.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Yet another breach of procedures by the infamous LNDD lab who have still not learnt any lessons about leaking results. But then when there are no penalties on them for doing so why would they bother?
I don't understand why the UCI doesn't give the samples to l'Equipe for testing and save themselves a whole lot of money 😉
Yet another breach of procedures by the infamous LNDD lab who have still not learnt any lessons about leaking results. But then when there are no penalties on them for doing so why would they bother?
I don't understand why the UCI doesn't give the samples to l'Equipe for testing and save themselves a whole lot of money 😉
Or just get l'Equipe to pick which foreign rider they want to throw out next, save even the problem of taking tests. l'Equipe has never been slow at coming forward against foriegn competitors , in the 60s Aaltonen had to drive a showroom Mini Cooper S up the Col De Turin to rpove that the works cars were "clean"
Cofidis have withdrawn from le Tour, including Bradley.
-- Don Whybrow
Sequi Bonum Non Time
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session." (Judge Gideon J. Tucker, 1866.)
Excellent. Now all we need is for the cheats to face a life ban and criminal charges for multi million pound fraud and the war on drugs would start to be won.
This is potentially a great day for cycling. No-one can single out cycling as being a druggie sport until other codes get tested the same. The more cheats that are exposed and the harder they get punished, the better the situation becomes.
Lets hope Rabo are now persuaded to pull out.
There should be an investigation into why the cheats are detected in the Grand Boucle but not in other top level races. Testing needs to be stepped up throughout the year and much more resources put into it.
There should be an investigation into why the cheats are detected in the Grand Boucle but not in other top level races. Testing needs to be stepped up throughout the year and much more resources put into it.
Agreed particularly as the biggest difference is the lab doing the tests - a lab which has been censured by the UCI's official investigator and has a track record of leaks, poor procedural controls and results that had to be rescinded. The test labs should be subject to independent expert GLP audit not the incestuous WADA system with its omerta.
There should be an investigation into why the cheats are detected in the Grand Boucle but not in other top level races. Testing needs to be stepped up throughout the year and much more resources put into it.
Agreed particularly as the biggest difference is the lab doing the tests - a lab which has been censured by the UCI's official investigator and has a track record of leaks, poor procedural controls and results that had to be rescinded. The test labs should be subject to independent expert GLP audit not the incestuous WADA system with its omerta.
Tony
Fair enough.
A more cynical man than myself might question the recent interest by the French in drugs at a time when their own cyclists are no longer at the very top of the sport.
Good quality labs would be self-financing, paid for by appropriating career earnings of the cheats.
Good quality labs would be self-financing, paid for by appropriating career earnings of the cheats.
Would that not give the labs an incentive to identify at least a minimum quota of positive samples? Sounds dangerous to me.
-- Danny Colyer <http://www.redpedals.co.uk/danny/> Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often "Daddy, put that down. Daddy, put that down. Daddy, put that down. Daddy, why did you put that down?" - Charlie Colyer, age 2
Of course, as Tony said on another thread, the labs would need to be audited to help ensure the quality of their results.
Independently audited. I have been audited in the pharma industry and I can tell you if this was a drugs or diagnostics lab it would be shut down in an instant by a regulatory body.
Yet another breach of procedures by the infamous LNDD lab who have still not learnt any lessons about leaking results. But then when there are no penalties on them for doing so why would they bother?
You are just making excuses for professional bike riders who use drugs in their bodies to earn money
I believe the laboratory should be ordained , under international law, to disclose all test made within a very very short period -- a day, 2 days at the outside
These aren't simple tests, and they aren't 'black and white' tests. The procedures are complex and sensitive and the interpretation of the data isn't simple and experts may disagree (which is why there are 'B' samples). You wreck people's careers with false positives, and there certainly have been false positives.
This is a very difficult nexus of science, politics and money. I do not believe that judgements made under time pressure are in anyone's interest.