Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

When a 26 is not a 26....

Started by Scott Gordo · · Last activity · 6 posts · 262 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
23 July 2007
Last activity
25 July 2007
Original author
Scott Gordo
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
262
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. To support my bicycle and motorcycle habits, I garbage pick old bikes,
    fix them up, and sell them.

    For the most part they don't need much more than a squirt of oil and a
    patched tube. Lots of them have tire-rot as well.

    I picked up a Schwinn Collegiate coaster brake bike that was in decent
    condition. There was literally around 1/4" of mung growing off the
    chain.There's a bit of rust on the rims, stem and bars, nothing a
    quick brushing couldn't handle. The tires were totally shot, with
    large chunks of the gumwall cracking off onto the floor. I was able to
    make out some basic info: Made in USA, 26 x 1 3/8, Schwinn.

    I looked through my supply of decent-condition tires and found a pair
    of 26 x 1 3/8 that came off of a Raliegh 3-speed that had been crushed
    by a car. (Don't worry, I live in NYC and the bike was locked to a
    pole but had fallen over and into the path of a parking car.)

    I popped off what was left of the old 26" tires from the Schwinn
    (which were the originals and with good tread, btw), and proceeded to
    install the Raliegh's 26s.

    20 minutes later, I'd broken two plastic tire levers. I tried the
    other tire, thinking that maybe this happened to be an unusually tight
    bead. I looked at the rim but found no info. Then I found another 26 x
    1 3/8 gumwall from a different bike, some dept store Spalding or
    something. This tire seemed more promising.

    30 minutes later, I did something I've considered close to a cardinal
    sin ever since I was a teenager working on my BMX bike. I commissioned
    a flathead screwdriver to the purpose of installing the tire. "The
    right tool for the right job" only holds up for so long.

    After enough grunting, groaning, and cursing to make my GF stop asking
    me if I was okay, I got one side of that sucker on. It didn't look
    healthy, though. The other side...HAH! No dice.

    Tried an mtb tire that I knew sat loosely on my Mavic 121 rims. Again,
    no dice.

    FINALLY, I took another look at the chunks of gumwall still attached
    to the threads. Something about "S-5 or S-6". Did some googling and,
    lo and behold, Schwinn did their own tire sizing.

    A quick trip to the LBS for a S-6 tire and $10 later I all was in
    working order.

    Yeah, I'm sure this is something a lot of you guys have known about
    for a long time, but there's always something new for me.

    /s

  2. Scott Gordo said:

    To support my bicycle and motorcycle habits, I garbage pick old bikes,
    fix them up, and sell them.

    One of these days I plan to emulate that. Instead of fixing them up and
    selling them to friends for part cost...

    Quoted message said:

    FINALLY, I took another look at the chunks of gumwall still attached
    to the threads. Something about "S-5 or S-6". Did some googling and,
    lo and behold, Schwinn did their own tire sizing.

    Evvvvil. I knew about the 26x1.375 vs 26x1-3/8 distinction. I wasn't
    aware there were two 26x1-3/8 at 590mm and 597mm. Evil, I say.

    --
    Dane Buson - [email hidden]
    Secure, Usable, Microsoft. Pick any two.

  3. Dane Buson said:
    Scott Gordo said:

    To support my bicycle and motorcycle habits, I garbage pick old bikes,
    fix them up, and sell them.

    One of these days I plan to emulate that. Instead of fixing them up and
    selling them to friends for part cost...

    Quoted message said:

    FINALLY, I took another look at the chunks of gumwall still attached
    to the threads. Something about "S-5 or S-6". Did some googling and,
    lo and behold, Schwinn did their own tire sizing.

    Evvvvil. I knew about the 26x1.375 vs 26x1-3/8 distinction. I wasn't
    aware there were two 26x1-3/8 at 590mm and 597mm. Evil, I say.

    --
    Dane Buson - [email hidden]
    Secure, Usable, Microsoft. Pick any two.

    I give away a lot of little kids bikes I find in the NJ suburbs.
    They're virtually unused, and kids in my nabe in Brooklyn are wide-
    eyed reverent towards them. One kid in particular was a huge Power
    Rangers fan. I gave him a Power Rangers bike I found and his mom says
    he wants to sleep to the thing. She gave me a dozen photos of him
    riding, admiring, and posing (as the proud owner) with the bike. Good
    stuff.

    I often give friends who want to try out a fixie a bike that will fit
    them but has bum wheels (which is pretty common). Pull all the
    shifting stuff, let them buy the rear wheel and cog, cut the chain and
    they're pretty much ready to roll.

    Most other stuff that I just don't want to mess with gets donated to
    www.recycleabicycle.com, which is a program for city high school
    students. They learn how to do repairs, work a register, stock parts
    and such, and generally run a business. It's all good. I get a real
    kick out of running into people on bikes I donated.

    I do this out of love, and despite Chicago Schwinn's diabolical
    conventions 😉

    /s

  4. Dane Buson said:

    Evvvvil. I knew about the 26x1.375 vs 26x1-3/8 distinction. I wasn't
    aware there were two 26x1-3/8 at 590mm and 597mm. Evil, I say.

    That's why ERTRO sizing (BSD x Width or vice versa) is your friend,
    and a lot of folks these parts will only refer to tire or rim sizing
    that way. I'm getting to be one of them.

  5. Scott Gordo said:

    To support my bicycle and motorcycle habits, I garbage pick old bikes,
    fix them up, and sell them.

    For the most part they don't need much more than a squirt of oil and a
    patched tube. Lots of them have tire-rot as well.

    I picked up a Schwinn Collegiate coaster brake bike that was in decent
    condition. There was literally around 1/4" of mung growing off the
    chain.There's a bit of rust on the rims, stem and bars, nothing a
    quick brushing couldn't handle. The tires were totally shot, with
    large chunks of the gumwall cracking off onto the floor. I was able to
    make out some basic info: Made in USA, 26 x 1 3/8, Schwinn.

    I looked through my supply of decent-condition tires and found a pair
    of 26 x 1 3/8 that came off of a Raliegh 3-speed that had been crushed
    by a car. (Don't worry, I live in NYC and the bike was locked to a
    pole but had fallen over and into the path of a parking car.)

    I popped off what was left of the old 26" tires from the Schwinn
    (which were the originals and with good tread, btw), and proceeded to
    install the Raliegh's 26s.

    20 minutes later, I'd broken two plastic tire levers. I tried the
    other tire, thinking that maybe this happened to be an unusually tight
    bead. I looked at the rim but found no info. Then I found another 26 x
    1 3/8 gumwall from a different bike, some dept store Spalding or
    something. This tire seemed more promising.

    30 minutes later, I did something I've considered close to a cardinal
    sin ever since I was a teenager working on my BMX bike. I commissioned
    a flathead screwdriver to the purpose of installing the tire. "The
    right tool for the right job" only holds up for so long.

    After enough grunting, groaning, and cursing to make my GF stop asking
    me if I was okay, I got one side of that sucker on. It didn't look
    healthy, though. The other side...HAH! No dice.

    Tried an mtb tire that I knew sat loosely on my Mavic 121 rims. Again,
    no dice.

    FINALLY, I took another look at the chunks of gumwall still attached
    to the threads. Something about "S-5 or S-6". Did some googling and,
    lo and behold, Schwinn did their own tire sizing.

    A quick trip to the LBS for a S-6 tire and $10 later I all was in
    working order.

    Yeah, I'm sure this is something a lot of you guys have known about
    for a long time, but there's always something new for me.

    Your Collegiate has '26-inch' 597mm rims. Standard British tires are
    '26-inch' 590mm which not the same as mountain bike '26-inch' 559mm nor
    the once-dead-but-perhaps-breathing-again 650B '26-inch' 584mm nor
    triathlete's choice, the '26-inch' 571mm size nor the truly obsolete
    American 1.375 or '26-inch' 611mm hook-bead tires.

    You were right with a 597mm or "EA-1" 26 x 1-3/8 x 1-1/4 tire, about $10
    at any LBS which commonly services bicycles.

    p.s. "S6" is a rim section, not a size. The "S6" design also existed as
    a 24-inch rim.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971


  6. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    FINALLY, I took another look at the chunks of gumwall still attached
    to the threads. Something about "S-5 or S-6". Did some googling and,
    lo and behold, Schwinn did their own tire sizing.

    Ah yes...the 'ol "Schwinn sized" tires :-). Another reason to dislike
    those gawd awful often proprietary tanks. Can't say their limitations
    have limited their current resale value though.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.