Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Top Swing or Down Swing

Started by Lou Holtman · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,855 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
14 November 2003
Last activity
17 November 2003
Original author
Lou Holtman
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,855
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    Is there a difference in shifting performance between a Top Swing and a Down Swing front derailleur
    (Shimano XT) and if so what is the reason?

    TIA,

    Lou

  2. Lou Holtman said:

    Hi,

    Is there a difference in shifting performance between a Top Swing and a Down Swing front derailleur
    (Shimano XT) and if so what is the reason?

    After using top-swing FDs on several MTBs over the years (XT, LX, XTR differential plate model), I
    ended up with a bike that would not accept a top-swing FD, and found the bottom-swing shifted better
    than any of my other bikes.

    Since using the bottom-swing, I have replaced another il- working top-swing model with a
    bottom-swing, and its been great. And I am waiting for something to happen to the 3rd bike's
    top-swing FD so I can change it too.

    I find that the top-swing models flex a lot more than top-swing models.

    Some bikes can't use a bottom swing, typically when the bottle cage boss ends up right where the FD
    clamp goes.

    Personally, I will use top-swing FDs until they come up with a better way to shift on the
    front ring.

    G

  3. GregR said:
    Lou Holtman said:

    Hi,

    Is there a difference in shifting performance between a Top Swing and a Down Swing front
    derailleur (Shimano XT) and if so what is the reason?

    After using top-swing FDs on several MTBs over the years (XT, LX, XTR differential plate model), I
    ended up with a bike that would not accept a top-swing FD, and found the bottom-swing shifted
    better than any of my other bikes.

    Since using the bottom-swing, I have replaced another il- working top-swing model with a
    bottom-swing, and its been great. And I am waiting for something to happen to the 3rd bike's
    top-swing FD so I can change it too.

    I've followed you up till now.

    Quoted message said:

    I find that the top-swing models flex a lot more than top-swing models.

    Getting a little confusing.

    Quoted message said:


    Some bikes can't use a bottom swing, typically when the bottle cage boss ends up right where the
    FD clamp goes.

    Now I'm confused. Do you mean top or bottom swing?

    Quoted message said:

    Personally, I will use top-swing FDs until they come up with a better way to shift on the
    front ring.

    And now I'm really confused. Didn't you start out by saying that you prefered bottom swing?

    Quoted message said:


    G

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

  4. "Per Elmsäter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    GregR said:
    Lou Holtman said:

    Hi,

    Is there a difference in shifting performance between a Top Swing and a Down Swing front
    derailleur (Shimano XT) and if so what is the reason?

    After using top-swing FDs on several MTBs over the years (XT, LX, XTR differential plate model),
    I ended up with a bike that would not accept a top-swing FD, and found the bottom-swing shifted
    better than any of my other bikes.

    Since using the bottom-swing, I have replaced another il- working top-swing model with a
    bottom-swing, and its been great. And I am waiting for something to happen to the 3rd bike's
    top-swing FD so I can change it too.

    I've followed you up till now.

    Quoted message said:

    I find that the top-swing models flex a lot more than top-swing models.

    Getting a little confusing.

    Quoted message said:


    Some bikes can't use a bottom swing, typically when the bottle cage boss ends up right where the
    FD clamp goes.

    Now I'm confused. Do you mean top or bottom swing?

    Quoted message said:

    Personally, I will use top-swing FDs until they come up with a better way to shift on the
    front ring.

    And now I'm really confused. Didn't you start out by saying that you prefered bottom swing?

    Quoted message said:


    G

    --
    Perre

    You have to be smarter than a robot to reply.

    What I ment in the first place was

    down swing = clamp above the cage, top swing = clamp under the cage,

    Both Top Pull ;-)

    I too notice that a top swing flex a lot more.

    Lou

  5. "Lou Holtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What I ment in the first place was

    down swing = clamp above the cage, top swing = clamp under the cage,

    Both Top Pull ;-)

    I too notice that a top swing flex a lot more.

    All I know is that my XT top swing derailer is a piece of [censored]. I don't know if it's flex inherent
    to the design, or that this particular model has sloppy pivots. But if I could find a good
    replacement with a bottom swing design I'd buy it. So far, I haven't found one that's top pull,
    bottom swing, for a 1 3/8" seat tube.

    Matt O.

  6. "Matt O'Toole" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Lou Holtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    What I ment in the first place was

    down swing = clamp above the cage, top swing = clamp under the cage,

    Both Top Pull ;-)

    I too notice that a top swing flex a lot more.

    All I know is that my XT top swing derailer is a piece of [censored]. I don't


    know if

    Quoted message said:

    it's flex inherent to the design, or that this particular model has sloppy pivots. But if I could
    find a good replacement with a bottom swing design


    I'd

    Quoted message said:

    buy it. So far, I haven't found one that's top pull, bottom swing, for a


    1 3/8"

    Quoted message said:

    seat tube.

    Matt O.

    Isn't the Shimano FD-M751 SH-562052 the one you are looking for (XT down swing/top pull with a 34.9
    mm clamp)?

    Lou

  7. "Lou Holtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Isn't the Shimano FD-M751 SH-562052 the one you are looking for (XT down swing/top pull with a
    34.9 mm clamp)?

    Could be, but I've never been able to find one in stock anywhere.

    Matt O.

  8. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Lou Holtman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
    What I ment in the first place was down swing = clamp above the cage, top swing = clamp under the
    cage, Both Top Pull ;-) I too notice that a top swing flex a lot more.

    Matt O'Toole said:

    All I know is that my XT top swing derailer is a piece of [censored]. I don't know if it's flex inherent
    to the design, or that this particular model has sloppy pivots. But if I could find a good
    replacement with a bottom swing design I'd buy it. So far, I haven't found one that's top pull,
    bottom swing, for a 1 3/8" seat tube.

    We have the Deore LX M566 in 34.8, TP, Bottom swing black color $34.95, part of a tranche of
    obsolete but useful front changers. yellowjersey.orgders.html

    There are too darn many variables for FDers!

    --
    Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 1 guest ·0 bots ·1 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.