Triathlon · Public discussion

Data (was PowerCranks Study)

Started by Phil Holman · · Last activity · 4 posts · 913 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Triathlon
Published
17 November 2003
Last activity
17 November 2003
Original author
Phil Holman
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
913
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Here is a condensed preview of the numbers from the PC testing. The study was conducted by Mark D.
    Luttrell, Dept of Health, Sport and Exercise Science, University of Kansas and Jeffrey A.
    Pottteiger, Dept of Physical Education, Health and Sports Studies, Miami University.

    The effects of 6 weeks of training with PCs was examined for 6 cyclists (+6 with regular cranks) to
    determine changes in V02 max, AT, HR, V0, and RER during a 1 hour submaximal ride (~69% V02 max).

    Here are the numbers for Heartrate (HR) and Gross Efficiency (GE) before and after training.

    Time (minutes)

    PC Group 15 30 45 60

    HR Pre 154 155 156 157

    Post 141 140 141 141

    GE (%)Pre 21.5 21.3 21.6 21.5

    Post 23.1 23.0 23.6 23.9

    Control Group

    HR Pre 166 165 166 163

    Post 159 159 159 160

    GE (%) Pre 21.3 20.8 20.8 21.2

    Post 21.8 21.5 21.3 21.0

    Significant is the 2% increase in Gross Efficiency of the PC group.

    Phil Holman

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"

    Quoted message said:


    Significant is the 2% increase in Gross Efficiency of the PC group.

    Was the difference statistically signifcant?

    --Harold Buck

    "I used to rock and roll all night, and party every day. Then it was every other day. . . ."

    - Homer J. Simpson

  3. "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"

    Quoted message said:


    Significant is the 2% increase in Gross Efficiency of the PC group.

    Was the difference statistically signifcant?

    It didn't say that. The actual words are "significantly different from normal cranks group following
    training" and "significantly different from pretraining for PowerCranks group".

    Phil Holman

  4. they used those words, Phil, because these differences reached statistical significance (at the 5%
    level), as I read the study. So, the word significantly as used in those sentances, meant
    statistically significant.

    Frank "Phil Holman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, "Phil Holman"

    Quoted message said:


    Significant is the 2% increase in Gross Efficiency of the PC group.

    Was the difference statistically signifcant?

    It didn't say that. The actual words are "significantly different from normal cranks group
    following training" and "significantly different from pretraining for PowerCranks group".

    Phil Holman

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.