cite, please. most proposed federal regs require some kind of comment period. or is this in the super-secret black helicopter realm?
You've already demonstrated your complete unwillingness to even so much as read the FDA's own document. Here you are refuting a claim which you have no knowledge of whatsoever. That's quite a trick. UNtil you actually know what it is your are refuting, perhaps you could either keep an open mind, or shut up?
cite, please. most proposed federal regs require some kind of comment period. or is this in the super-secret black helicopter realm?
You've already demonstrated your complete unwillingness to even so much as read the FDA's own document. Here you are refuting a claim which you have no knowledge of whatsoever. That's quite a trick. UNtil you actually know what it is your are refuting, perhaps you could either keep an open mind, or shut up?
Have a nice glass of kool-aid, pal.
Paul
that's right, i'm not going to wade through a .pdf from the f.d.a. guess i'll be laughing out of the other side of my mouth when they lock me up for drinking unauthorized green tea, huh?
"blake murphy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Paul M. Cook said:
Quoted message said:
cite, please. most proposed federal regs require some kind of comment period. or is this in the super-secret black helicopter realm?
You've already demonstrated your complete unwillingness to even so much
as
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
read the FDA's own document. Here you are refuting a claim which you
have
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
no knowledge of whatsoever. That's quite a trick. UNtil you actually
know
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
what it is your are refuting, perhaps you could either keep an open mind,
or
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
shut up?
Have a nice glass of kool-aid, pal.
Paul
that's right, i'm not going to wade through a .pdf from the f.d.a. guess i'll be laughing out of the other side of my mouth when they lock me up for drinking unauthorized green tea, huh?
There's not a lot of "wading" as most of the PDF is typical white space or footnotes. You can actually read the pertinent part in about 10 minutes. That's less than 20 pages.
And no, you won't be arrested for drinking green tea. That's simply not what its about but the patronizing reframing is not unexpected from those who simply prefer ignorance over knowledge. But to be fair, I can see why you'd be skeptical. After all, the FDA is trying to prevent so many of those illnesses caused from juices. We here about them every day, thousands sickened by juices and massage oil. It's not like melamine for example, which probably will soon be listed as a "nutritional supplement."
But since you've divined the content and intent what's the point?
