General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Laser Competition

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 10 posts · 268 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
5 May 2007
Last activity
6 May 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
268
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi All,
    The local garden centre was having a tent exhibition today whilst I
    was passing so I thought I'd pop in to see whether there were any
    lightweight offerings. Of particular interest to me was the Laser
    Comp. Supposedly lighter (by a 1kgish) than my Akto I wondered whether
    anybody had any practical experience with the Laser and had any
    comments on it?. My first impressions was that the main loop felt a
    bit flimsy and definitely needed side guide lines to stabilise against
    cross winds. There's some stuff on the web saying that the 'special'
    tent pegs are rubbish and need immediate replacement for anything
    other than valley pitches.

    I had heard that the space inside was condiserably less than that
    available in the Akto, although once inside I didn't think it was that
    much smaller and if the weight reduction was significant, then it
    might be worth the switch?. I usually find getting the 'angles' right
    for the guy lines on my Akto a bit of a pain, so just having one on
    the Laser seemed good although I don't know how effective that would
    be on uneven ground.

    Anybody made any practical experience with the Laser or Laser Comp?.

    Ta in advance,
    Dave

  2. Quoted message said:

    Hi All,
    The local garden centre was having a tent exhibition today whilst I
    was passing so I thought I'd pop in to see whether there were any
    lightweight offerings. Of particular interest to me was the Laser
    Comp. Supposedly lighter (by a 1kgish) than my Akto I wondered whether
    anybody had any practical experience with the Laser and had any
    comments on it?.

    I've got the Laser. Just had a quick look at the Laser Comp. What's this
    "Weighing in at a mere 860g without pegs" nonsense? Who's going to use it
    without pegs? And there's the waterpoof cover for the central pole,
    generally essential in the UK climate. And what about the tent bags? Are you
    going to throw it all in your rucksack without packing it up in anything
    first? I wonder how much it really weighs (but I know it'll still be very
    light).

    Quoted message said:

    My first impressions was that the main loop felt a
    bit flimsy and definitely needed side guide lines to stabilise against
    cross winds. There's some stuff on the web saying that the 'special'
    tent pegs are rubbish and need immediate replacement for anything
    other than valley pitches.

    Yep, they are rubbish. Not only do they not have curved ends, but the metal
    tips have fallen out of a few of mine and had to be glued back in. I really
    should replace them, they wouldn't inspire confidence in strong winds.

    Quoted message said:

    I had heard that the space inside was condiserably less than that
    available in the Akto, although once inside I didn't think it was that
    much smaller and if the weight reduction was significant, then it
    might be worth the switch?

    Don't know about the comp, but the standard Laser is about the same size I
    think, with slightly higher headroom. When I sat in an Akto I found the
    headroom a bit low. Definitely worth the switch if the weight saving is
    important to you.

    Quoted message said:

    I usually find getting the 'angles' right
    for the guy lines on my Akto a bit of a pain, so just having one on
    the Laser

    One? Surely there are four?

    Quoted message said:

    seemed good although I don't know how effective that would
    be on uneven ground.

    I find the Laser fiddly to pitch. If you don't get it tensioned right half
    the inner touches the flysheet while the other half has a huge gap. It takes
    a bit of fiddling to get the gap even on each side.

    Quoted message said:

    Anybody made any practical experience with the Laser or Laser Comp?.

    Yep, great for lightweight backpacking.

    Paul
    --
    http://www.wilderness-wales.co.uk

  3. "Paul Saunders"

    Quoted message said:

    . What's this "Weighing in at a mere 860g without pegs" nonsense? Who's
    going to use it without pegs?

    How man. Train some sheep to sit on the edges you'll be fine.

    Chris

  4. Paul Saunders said:

    I've got the Laser. Just had a quick look at the Laser Comp. What's this
    "Weighing in at a mere 860g without pegs" nonsense? Who's going to use it
    without pegs? And there's the waterpoof cover for the central pole,
    generally essential in the UK climate. And what about the tent bags? Are you
    going to throw it all in your rucksack without packing it up in anything
    first?

    The first two, fully agree, the last one, why not? I've frequently
    taken my Spacepacker just by stuffing its component bits into
    corners, I don't see anything silly about that. In fact, not using
    a stuffsack for a tent often makes more sense than using one, as
    you can pack 4 separate small things more efficiently than 1 big one.

    Quoted message said:

    Yep, they are rubbish. Not only do they not have curved ends, but the metal
    tips have fallen out of a few of mine and had to be glued back in. I really
    should replace them, they wouldn't inspire confidence in strong winds.

    My immediate reservations were cracking after use in stoney ground,
    but now I've seen they have no hook that's a minor consideration.
    Ridiculous! Terra Nova do titanium skewers, and even they admit
    they're a sesnible replacement for "real" use.

    Quoted message said:

    Don't know about the comp, but the standard Laser is about the same size I
    think, with slightly higher headroom. When I sat in an Akto I found the
    headroom a bit low. Definitely worth the switch if the weight saving is
    important to you.

    More to it than weight though. The Akto uses tougher fabrics and a
    stouter pole, so it will last longer in frequent use and less
    likely to, for example, have the groundsheet holed on a relatively
    grotty pitch or suffer badly under snow loads. That's *not* to say
    the Lasers aren't good enough, especially if you're not using a
    tent /that/ often (to be honest, most of us probably don't, with
    single figures of trips a year), but it's simply a case that
    Hilleberg drew their line between light weight and ruggedness in a
    different place. Outwith their ultralite range, Terra Nova draw it
    in a different place too.
    If you've an original Akto you can save about 200g by moving to the
    later model, though same thing goes there, with lighter and less
    tough fabrics used, though still heavuer and tougher than the
    Laser's (Hilleberg's standard fabric is 1.3 times heavier than the
    light one used in Nallos and current Akto, but 1.5 times as strong
    (tear resistance) which shows how lighter fabrics really do
    progressively weaken a tent... but even the light one is remarkably
    strong). How strong is strong enough? I would guess the LC is
    fine for the UK where you can pick and choose a pitch, but it won't
    be as tough and dependable.

    You choose, you lose...

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  5. Dave,

    A few thoughts below.

    email hidden said:

    I wondered whether
    anybody had any practical experience with the Laser and had any
    comments on it?.

    I have a Laser and am very happy with it. It is light and packs small
    (The internal poles mean that it is always a longish package but is
    squashes very narrow and slides nicely down the side of my pack. It
    has plenty of space for solo camping or (just) enough space for two
    (if you are friendly and willing to throw the rucksacks outside in a
    survival bag!). I like the design, with the wide vista with both
    flaps rolled back.

    Quoted message said:

    My first impressions was that the main loop felt a
    bit flimsy and definitely needed side guide lines to stabilise against
    cross winds.

    It is not the strongest tent in the work, but seems to be fine, even
    in quite windy conditions. I probably wouldn't choose it for the worst
    conditions, but it has stood up quite well so far. Mine has side
    guys. (Pic at http://www.cognate.info/snowdon/html/diary.html).

    Quoted message said:

    There's some stuff on the web saying that the 'special'
    tent pegs are rubbish and need immediate replacement for anything
    other than valley pitches.

    I have found the pegs to be fine, and haven't suffered from them
    breaking. I did superglue all the yellow plastic caps on though.
    I've had no problems with the metal tips breaking off, but maybe I
    haven't used it enough yet! My only concern has been that the pegs
    are a bit short (as with many lightweight pegs), which limits their
    holding power in soft or sandy ground.

    Quoted message said:

    I usually find getting the 'angles' right
    for the guy lines on my Akto a bit of a pain, so just having one on
    the Laser seemed good although I don't know how effective that would
    be on uneven ground.

    It took me a while to work out how best to pitch it, but I have got
    the hang of it now, and it goes up quickly and easily with a bit of
    practice.

    All in all I'm very happy with it as a lightweight tent for reasonable
    conditions. I wouldn't take it out in hurricanes or heavy snowfall,
    but it is great for the sort of walking I do.

    I also have a trusty old Ultimate Peapod. Still doing great service
    after 20 years. I shall be using it next weekend. Anyone else still
    got one of those?

    Jell

  6. Plenty of debate on these two tents on Outdoors Magic Forum

    You've spotted most of the pros and cons. Overall Atko is reckoned to be
    slightly larger and more robust. The TN sacrificing a bit too much to get
    the weight loss. And as for the pegs - ditch 'em

    Personally I went to see both tents in the flesh at the same place, and the
    Atko was my choice

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Hi All,
    The local garden centre was having a tent exhibition today whilst I
    was passing so I thought I'd pop in to see whether there were any
    lightweight offerings. Of particular interest to me was the Laser
    Comp. Supposedly lighter (by a 1kgish) than my Akto I wondered whether
    anybody had any practical experience with the Laser and had any
    comments on it?. My first impressions was that the main loop felt a
    bit flimsy and definitely needed side guide lines to stabilise against
    cross winds. There's some stuff on the web saying that the 'special'
    tent pegs are rubbish and need immediate replacement for anything
    other than valley pitches.

    I had heard that the space inside was condiserably less than that
    available in the Akto, although once inside I didn't think it was that
    much smaller and if the weight reduction was significant, then it
    might be worth the switch?. I usually find getting the 'angles' right
    for the guy lines on my Akto a bit of a pain, so just having one on
    the Laser seemed good although I don't know how effective that would
    be on uneven ground.

    Anybody made any practical experience with the Laser or Laser Comp?.

    Ta in advance,
    Dave

  7. The message <[email hidden]>
    from Jell <[email hidden]> contains these words:

    Quoted message said:

    I also have a trusty old Ultimate Peapod. Still doing great service
    after 20 years. I shall be using it next weekend. Anyone else still
    got one of those?

    I still have an Ultimate U1B but haven't actually used it for more than
    20 years. IIRC the U1 was the first tent Ultimate introduced and I had
    an early one.

    --
    Roger Chapman
    Nearest Marilyn still to be visited - Great Orme.
    89 miles as the crow flies,
    considerably more as the walker drives.

  8. Bryan Hall said:

    And as for the pegs - ditch 'em

    Always worth thinking about getting extra sets of pegs for different
    conditions: skewers are lightest and work best on stony ground, but
    they're tending towards the useless in snow and dry, sandy soils where V
    stakes work better, and the wider (and heavier!) they are the better
    they work in more marginal conditions.

    Quoted message said:

    Personally I went to see both tents in the flesh at the same place, and the
    Atko was my choice

    Always a good idea IMHO. If you're getting a tent through the post, or
    a shop doesn't have the space to pitch for you, check in advance with
    the supplier what they're happy with for your own demo pitch that will
    still let you take it back. Outside may well be okay /if/ you pitch on
    a plastic sheet and use your own pags, but ask to be sure.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  9. In message <[email hidden]>, Chris Gilbert
    <[email hidden]> writes

    Quoted message said:

    How man. Train some sheep to sit on the edges you'll be fine.

    Hmm! You DID mean to type sit did you ?....:-)
    --
    Bill Grey

  10. Bill Grey wrote

    Quoted message said:

    Hmm! You DID mean to type sit did you ?....:-)

    Darn. No, I meant to type dance ;-)

    Chris

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.