Then they would ask people what would the US strategy be to invade Iran. they would show them a map and ask people where the attack would start , whether to use airplanes, ships, infantry etc. Of course, all the countries had been mislabeled. Iran was Australia. So, people would point to Australia and say "here is Iran", and we should come from these areas with planes ships, etc.
Sad.....very sad.
This sort of thing extends to virtually all opinion polls.
X% of the respondents think this or that. The poll results, if it's in the political realm, becomes an actual news item for a time (until the next poll), and politicians change their positions based on them.
Although the poll takers will tell you the results are good to plus/minus 2% or whatever, they never really tell you what percent of the respondents where actually knowledgeable enough on the issue to make any sort of informed decision!
The country is being indirectly controlled through the opinions of the clueless!
On Jun 19, 10:57 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
On Jun 19, 6:54 pm, Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Then they would ask people what would the US strategy be to invade Iran. they would show them a map and ask people where the attack would start , whether to use airplanes, ships, infantry etc. Of course, all the countries had been mislabeled. Iran was Australia. So, people would point to Australia and say "here is Iran", and we should come from these areas with planes ships, etc.
Quoted message said:
Sad.....very sad.
This sort of thing extends to virtually all opinion polls.
X% of the respondents think this or that. The poll results, if it's in the political realm, becomes an actual news item for a time (until the next poll), and politicians change their positions based on them.
Although the poll takers will tell you the results are good to plus/minus 2% or whatever, they never really tell you what percent of the respondents where actually knowledgeable enough on the issue to make any sort of informed decision!
The country is being indirectly controlled through the opinions of the clueless!
The vote totals for The Gipper and Dubya confirm that beyond a doubt.
The country is being indirectly controlled through the opinions of the clueless!
The vote totals for The Gipper and Dubya confirm that beyond a doubt.
At least the Gipper was a good actor and you can explain his part that way. Dubya can only be explained by the dumbing down of the populace (i.e. they can relate to a guy who only got "C" grades in school and spent most of his time partying until age 45).
... At least the Gipper was a good actor and you can explain his part that way. Dubya can only be explained by the dumbing down of the populace (i.e. they can relate to a guy who only got "C" grades in school and spent most of his time partying until age 45).
Like the people who said Bush "won" the debate over Gore, because he seemed more like a person they would want to hang out with at a barbeque?
The whole idea of voting for politicians on personality or even character is stupid. I don't care if someone is an unpleasant lying [censored] as long as he/she represents my interests, and not those of the "old inherited money" class at the expense of people who actually work for a living and contribute to society.
-- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
The country is being indirectly controlled through the opinions of the clueless!
The vote totals for The Gipper and Dubya confirm that beyond a doubt.
At least the Gipper was a good actor and you can explain his part that way. Dubya can only be explained by the dumbing down of the populace (i.e. they can relate to a guy who only got "C" grades in school and spent most of his time partying until age 45).
How about because the alternatives presented were dreadful. Bush actually graduated with a masters degree and Al Gore never really graduated from anything past high school. Looking at their respective grades at Yale, Bush outpointed Kerry also.
Face it the kid saying things like "I understand it, but I think you need to explain it more for the others" is really NOT the smartest guy in the room.
"Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Johnny Sunset said:
On Jun 21, 9:10 am, RonSonic who? wrote:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
> ...Bush actually graduated with a masters degree...
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
The children of the rich and powerful do not get failing grades.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Then why did AlGore flunk out of divinity school? LOL
Quoted message said:
It was Bush's fault!
I bet Bush fed Gore faulty crib notes, and even though he'd earnestly studied the material all school-year long (because it was really important, you see), in the end the only thing that counted was what Bush said and not the professors, text books, class discussions, guest lecturers, homework assignments, etc. etc. etc.
