UK and Europe · Public discussion

Highway Code - Response from MP

Started by Andy Cox · · Last activity · 4 posts · 424 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
14 June 2007
Last activity
14 June 2007
Original author
Andy Cox
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
424
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Dear group,

    Apologies if this has been done elsewhere if so I must have missed it.

    Like a lot of you, following the cr*p effort by CTC to fight the Highway
    Code changes, I wrote to my MP (Mark Williams, Lib Dem, Ceredigion) about
    why the changes to rules 61 and 63 were a bad thing and asking whether he
    would consider signing Menzies Campbell's EDM. He subsequently has and
    today I received a reply to my letter:

    [Heavy paraphrasing to save my fingers]

    "I agree with you that as currently drafted, Rules 61 and 63 do not
    adequately represent the safest way to cycle. As you point out... could
    lead to negligence claims & encourage cyclists to behave in a way
    inappropriate to conditions. Confirm signing EDM 1433.

    You may be aware that, following the complaints of many cyclists, the
    government has decided to change these rules. There will now be a short
    period of consultation with interested parties and the amended rules will be
    laid before parliament by 15th June at the latest. Please find enclosed a
    copy of the letter sent to me by the government regarding these changes FYI.

    I hope that the govt will now take this opportunity to listen to the views
    of the people who actually have experience and knowledge of cycling in
    traffic and come back with a much improved proposal...."

    All very good and glad I voted for the guy. In the enclosures it confirms
    unsurprisingly that CTC are among those consulted. As tomorrow is the
    deadline for this, and as someone with more than a passing interest, am I
    alone in only just hearing about any of these latest developments?

    AC

  2. Andy Cox said:

    Dear group,

    Apologies if this has been done elsewhere if so I must have missed it.

    Like a lot of you, following the cr*p effort by CTC to fight the Highway
    Code changes, I wrote to my MP (Mark Williams, Lib Dem, Ceredigion) about
    why the changes to rules 61 and 63 were a bad thing and asking whether he
    would consider signing Menzies Campbell's EDM. He subsequently has and
    today I received a reply to my letter:

    [Heavy paraphrasing to save my fingers]

    "I agree with you that as currently drafted, Rules 61 and 63 do not
    adequately represent the safest way to cycle. As you point out... could
    lead to negligence claims & encourage cyclists to behave in a way
    inappropriate to conditions. Confirm signing EDM 1433.

    You may be aware that, following the complaints of many cyclists, the
    government has decided to change these rules. There will now be a short
    period of consultation with interested parties and the amended rules will be
    laid before parliament by 15th June at the latest. Please find enclosed a
    copy of the letter sent to me by the government regarding these changes FYI.

    I hope that the govt will now take this opportunity to listen to the views
    of the people who actually have experience and knowledge of cycling in
    traffic and come back with a much improved proposal...."

    All very good and glad I voted for the guy. In the enclosures it confirms
    unsurprisingly that CTC are among those consulted. As tomorrow is the
    deadline for this, and as someone with more than a passing interest, am I
    alone in only just hearing about any of these latest developments?

    AC


    My MP who I didn't vote for forwarded me two letters yesterday. His own
    position is left unclear...

  3. Andy Cox wrote on 14/06/2007 17:43 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    All very good and glad I voted for the guy. In the enclosures it confirms
    unsurprisingly that CTC are among those consulted. As tomorrow is the
    deadline for this, and as someone with more than a passing interest, am I
    alone in only just hearing about any of these latest developments?

    You are alone. It has been discussed here extensively especially around
    whether the changes do the job.

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  4. Andy Cox said:

    All very good and glad I voted for the guy. In the enclosures it confirms
    unsurprisingly that CTC are among those consulted. As tomorrow is the
    deadline for this, and as someone with more than a passing interest, am I
    alone in only just hearing about any of these latest developments?

    If you mean, are you alone in only just receiving a response, no. I
    wrote to Mark Hendrick MP on 21st April. At least your MP has given you
    some reason to believe that something has been done.

    Cheers,
    Luke

    --
    Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in
    exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk>

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.