Road Cycling · Public discussion

Fair Play question

Started by Hell and High Water · · Last activity · 4 posts · 602 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 May 2007
Last activity
23 May 2007
Original author
Hell and High Water
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
602
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Are the reasons for this ever listed?

    I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.

    Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_

    -Bob

  2. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Hell and High Water said:

    Are the reasons for this ever listed?

    I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.

    Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_

    From Cyclingnews:
    ___________________
    Fair Play

    Finally, there is the Fair Play classification for teams. This is one where the more
    points the team has, the lower they are on the classification. It is scored using six
    criteria: A warning earns 0.50 points; a fine is worth 1 point for every 10 Swiss
    francs; a time penalty is worth 2 points per second; a declassification is worth 100
    points; a disqualification/explusion is worth 1000 points; and a positive doping
    control is worth 2000 points.
    ___________________

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007/giro07/?id=/features/2007/giro_classifications07

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

  3. In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Hell and High Water said:

    Are the reasons for this ever listed?

    I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.

    Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_

    From Cyclingnews:
    ___________________
    Fair Play

    Finally, there is the Fair Play classification for teams. This is one where the more
    points the team has, the lower they are on the classification. It is scored using six
    criteria: A warning earns 0.50 points; a fine is worth 1 point for every 10 Swiss
    francs; a time penalty is worth 2 points per second; a declassification is worth 100
    points; a disqualification/explusion is worth 1000 points; and a positive doping
    control is worth 2000 points.
    ___________________

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007/giro07/?id=/features/2007/giro_classifications07

    I know that, but I'm looking for a list of the teams specific
    infractions.

    Thanks.

    -Bob

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Hell and High Water said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,
    [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Hell and High Water said:

    Are the reasons for this ever listed?

    I'm wondering what the teams do/have done to get these points.

    Specifically, I see that CSC has 75. That's a lot of _something_

    From Cyclingnews:
    ___________________
    Fair Play

    Finally, there is the Fair Play classification for teams. This is one where
    the more points the team has, the lower they are on the classification. It is
    scored using six criteria: A warning earns 0.50 points; a fine is worth 1 point
    for every 10 Swiss francs; a time penalty is worth 2 points per second; a
    declassification is worth 100 points; a disqualification/explusion is worth
    1000 points; and a positive doping control is worth 2000 points.
    ___________________

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/road/2007/giro07/?id=/features/2007/giro_classifi
    cations07

    I know that, but I'm looking for a list of the teams specific
    infractions.

    Oh, sorry - I misunderstood your "I'm wondering..."

    --
    tanx,
    Howard

    Never take a tenant with a monkey.

    remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.