Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

cyclocomputer mess

Started by Santa · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,025 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
31 January 2003
Last activity
4 February 2003
Original author
Santa
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,025
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. got to change my cyclocomputer battery and forgot to set tire size, now my mileage is all screwed
    up, not that i use it much but this was the year i planned to get an actual log of my mileage, i
    could restart from zero but when you ride as much as i do every little mile is a whole lot of
    encouragement and don't want to end up thinking that i rode 100 = miles in the year, it would be
    better know that i rode all 105,74 miles in 2003. So i just want to know if some of you the not
    mathematically challenged can tell me if calculating it as a 3 rule knowing the mileage marked, the
    size marked and the actual size will actually give me a credible result. thanks.

  2. santa said:

    tell me if calculating it as a 3 rule knowing the mileage marked, the size marked and the actual
    size will actually give me a credible result. thanks.

    Yes, it will:

    Actual distance = marked distance * actual size / size marked
    --
    terry morse Palo Alto, CA terrymorse.combike

  3. "santa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    got to change my cyclocomputer battery and forgot to set tire size, now my mileage is all screwed
    up, not that i use it much but this was the year i planned to get an actual log of my mileage, i
    could restart from zero but when you ride as much as i do every little mile is a whole lot of
    encouragement and don't want to end up thinking that i rode 100 = miles in the year, it would be
    better know that i rode all 105,74 miles in 2003. So i just want to know if some of you the not
    mathematically challenged


    can

    Quoted message said:

    tell me if calculating it as a 3 rule knowing the mileage marked, the size marked and the actual
    size will actually give me a credible result.

    I think you are asking how to set the wheel travel setting, right? Most computers accept the wheel
    travel in meters. Best method is to ride over a spot of paint and measure from dot to dot on the
    pavement ( or even over several dots) A typical entry is "211" or "2105".

    This is typical but by no means universal. What kind of computer do you have?

    If you are asking how to input your prior accumulated mileage, I don't know.
    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

  4. A Muzi said:

    Most computers accept the wheel travel in meters. A typical entry is "211" or "2105".

    I want wheels that big.

    Stergios

  5. Quoted message said:

    "santa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    got to change my cyclocomputer battery and forgot to set tire size, now my mileage is all screwed
    up, not that i use it much but this was the year i planned to get an actual log of my mileage, i
    could restart from zero but when you ride as much as i do every little mile is a whole lot of
    encouragement and don't want to end up thinking that i rode 100 = miles in the year, it would be
    better know that i rode all 105,74 miles in 2003. So i just want to know if some of you the not
    mathematically challenged

    can

    Quoted message said:

    tell me if calculating it as a 3 rule knowing the mileage marked, the size marked and the actual
    size will actually give me a credible result.



    I think you are asking how to convert the indicated mileage with the wrong tire size to actual
    mileage. This is fairly simple. Simply divide the actual tire size by the size stored in your
    computer and multiply this by the indicated mileage. This will give you the true mileage.

    For example, if the stored value is 210 (cm) and the actual circumference of your wheel is 205 (cm),
    you would divide 205 by 210 (.9762) and multiply this by the mileage stored in you bike computer.

    Hope this helps.

  6. Stergios Papadakis said:
    A Muzi said:

    Most computers accept the wheel travel in meters. A typical entry is "211" or "2105".

    I want wheels that big.

    Many cyclocomputers will allow you to have wheels that big. See:

    sheldonbrown.comcyclecomputer calibration.html

    Check in the page for "Group F".

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Most computers accept the wheel travel in meters. > >> A typical entry


    is "211" or "2105".

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 12:03:08 -0500, a sharp-eyed Stergios Papadakis, who


    could be a copy editor,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I want wheels that big.

    "John Everett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Many cyclocomputers will allow you to have wheels that big. See:


    sheldonbrown.comcyclecomputer calibration.html

    Quoted message said:

    Check in the page for "Group F".

    I think he was pointing out my omitted decimal

    --
    Andrew Muzi yellowjersey.orgyellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April 1971

  8. A Muzi said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    A Muzi, wildly inaccurate but well-meaning, wrote:
    > Most computers accept the wheel travel in meters. > >> A typical entry


    is "211" or "2105".

    Quoted message said:

    On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 12:03:08 -0500, a sharp-eyed Stergios Papadakis, who


    could be a copy editor,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I want wheels that big.

    "John Everett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Many cyclocomputers will allow you to have wheels that big. See:


    sheldonbrown.comcyclecomputer calibration.html

    Quoted message said:

    Check in the page for "Group F".

    I think he was pointing out my omitted decimal

    And I was trying to point out that many cyclocomputers accept wheel circumferences in centimeters
    (e.g. 211), while many others accept circumferences in millimeters (e.g. 2105).

    jeverett3<AT>earthlink<DOT>net home.earthlink.net~jeverett3

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.