who's next?

Dan Gregory said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operaci...
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Bettini

Maybe not next but plenty of hints he will end up involved.

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operacionpuertodossier.shtml
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was. To be able to compete
with the doped likes of Ullrich, Pantani and Basso and beat them into the
ground shows what hard work means. Proper training and a VO2max of 82 were
all that was needed to beat the Eurodopers at their silly game. I have to
admit it. Dr. Andy Coggan was really, really onto the "truth" here.
ROTFLMAO!

B. Lafferty said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operaci...
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was.

Jackass -

Would you please stop obsessing about LANCE? It will be better for us
and in theory it'll be better for you too.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Quoted message said:

Dan Gregory said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operaci...
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Bettini

Maybe not next but plenty of hints he will end up involved.

Hints like ?...not wanting DNA to be tested ?

Kurgan Gringioni said:

B. Lafferty said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operaci...
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was.

Jackass -

Would you please stop obsessing about LANCE? It will be better for us
and in theory it'll be better for you too.

It's almost as if he's programmed to do it.

Bob Schwartz

wscott said:

Bettini
Maybe not next but plenty of hints he will end up involved.

Bettini has a pet ? I bet he had it spray-painted in WC colours.

Donald Munro <[email hidden]> wrote in news:4636e350$0$27190
[email hidden]:

Quoted message said:

wscott said:

Bettini
Maybe not next but plenty of hints he will end up involved.

Bettini has a pet ? I bet he had it spray-painted in WC colours.

Didn't have to, it's a golden retriever.

--
Bill Asher

In article
<[email hidden]>,

B. Lafferty said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operacionpuertodossier.shtml
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was. To be able to compete
with the doped likes of Ullrich, Pantani and Basso and beat them into the
ground shows what hard work means. Proper training and a VO2max of 82 were
all that was needed to beat the Eurodopers at their silly game. I have to
admit it. Dr. Andy Coggan was really, really onto the "truth" here.
ROTFLMAO!

Here, Brian, take a couple of these. You'll feel better in the morning.

--
Michael Press

"Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

B. Lafferty said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operaci...
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was.

Jackass -

Would you please stop obsessing about LANCE? It will be better for us
and in theory it'll be better for you too.

thanks,

K. Gringioni.

ROTFL!!

In article <[email hidden]>,

B. Lafferty said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operacionpuert
odossier.shtml
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was. To be able to compete
with the doped likes of Ullrich, Pantani and Basso and beat them into the
ground shows what hard work means. Proper training and a VO2max of 82 were
all that was needed to beat the Eurodopers at their silly game. I have to
admit it. Dr. Andy Coggan was really, really onto the "truth" here.
ROTFLMAO!

Oh Brian...at the risk of feeding the madness, I'd point out you're
making the French Gym Teacher argument ("pas naturellement"😉 by proxy.
And with sarcasm.

--
Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

On Tue, 01 May 2007 01:46:12 -0700, Michael Press <[email hidden]>

Quoted message said:

Here, Brian, take a couple of these. You'll feel better in the morning.

--
Michael Press

Its good you just happened to have a couple of suppositories handy.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...

Michael Press said:

Quoted message said:

Here, Brian, take a couple of these. You'll feel better in the morning.

Curtis L. Russell said:

Its good you just happened to have a couple of suppositories handy.

Pound will tell you all cyclists have caffeine suppositories in their
jersey pockets (that is, when they're not in use).

"Ryan Cousineau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

B. Lafferty said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operacionpuert
odossier.shtml
Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was. To be able to compete
with the doped likes of Ullrich, Pantani and Basso and beat them into the
ground shows what hard work means. Proper training and a VO2max of 82
were
all that was needed to beat the Eurodopers at their silly game. I have
to
admit it. Dr. Andy Coggan was really, really onto the "truth" here.
ROTFLMAO!

Oh Brian...at the risk of feeding the madness, I'd point out you're
making the French Gym Teacher argument ("pas naturellement"😉 by proxy.
And with sarcasm.

No. The gym teacher was dead wrong and Coggan and Coyle were on the money.
Lance did it all by working harder than anyone else and by becoming more
efficient over the years. ;-)

B. Lafferty said:

"Ryan Cousineau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,
"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message
news:[email hidden]...
>http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operaci...
> odossier.shtml
> Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
> 6000 page dossier

Quoted message said:

Quoted message said:

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was. To be able to compete
with the doped likes of Ullrich, Pantani and Basso and beat them into the
ground shows what hard work means. Proper training and a VO2max of 82
were
all that was needed to beat the Eurodopers at their silly game. I have
to
admit it. Dr. Andy Coggan was really, really onto the "truth" here.
ROTFLMAO!

Quoted message said:

Oh Brian...at the risk of feeding the madness, I'd point out you're
making the French Gym Teacher argument ("pas naturellement"😉 by proxy.
And with sarcasm.

No. The gym teacher was dead wrong and Coggan and Coyle were on the money.
Lance did it all by working harder than anyone else and by becoming more
efficient over the years. ;-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dont forget Coggan's bum chum R Chung and all the other doping
apologists from that clique.
Hmm, I wonder what Chung has done with his Tyler "I bullieve" badge
that he spent
a couple of hours queueing up for at Interbike a few years ago!

B. Lafferty said:

"Ryan Cousineau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In article <[email hidden]>,

B. Lafferty said:

"Dan Gregory" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message
news:[email hidden]...
> http://www.gazzetta.it/Ciclismo/Primo_Piano/2007/04_Aprile/30/operacionpuert
> odossier.shtml
> Hamilton & Jaksche out of Giro
> 6000 page dossier

Thank GOD Armstrong and the boys were clean. It really does put into
perspective what an amazing athlete Armstrong was. To be able to compete
with the doped likes of Ullrich, Pantani and Basso and beat them into the
ground shows what hard work means. Proper training and a VO2max of 82
were
all that was needed to beat the Eurodopers at their silly game. I have
to
admit it. Dr. Andy Coggan was really, really onto the "truth" here.
ROTFLMAO!

Oh Brian...at the risk of feeding the madness, I'd point out you're
making the French Gym Teacher argument ("pas naturellement"😉 by proxy.
And with sarcasm.

No. The gym teacher was dead wrong and Coggan and Coyle were on the money.
Lance did it all by working harder than anyone else and by becoming more
efficient over the years. ;-)

I might be confused here, that's not unusual, so let's see: Is it your position
that we can know Lance was cheating because everybody else was cheating and
Lance was able to beat them, meaning that he too must have been cheating?

Is that basically it?

If so, at what point of everyone else cheating does it become not cheating?

Ron

On Tue, 01 May 2007 16:19:54 +0200 in rec.bicycles.racing, Donald

Munro said:

Pound will tell you all cyclists have caffeine suppositories in their
jersey pockets (that is, when they're not in use).

is that why the gloves don't have fingers?

RonSonic said:

I might be confused here, that's not unusual, so let's see: Is it your position
that we can know Lance was cheating because everybody else was cheating and
Lance was able to beat them, meaning that he too must have been cheating?

Is that basically it?

If so, at what point of everyone else cheating does it become not cheating?

Perhaps he's suggesting that LANCE was better at 'cheating', or he's
panache was higher quality than everyone else's ?