UK and Europe · Public discussion

helmet subtext

Started by Adrian Godwin · · Last activity · 8 posts · 218 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
26 April 2007
Last activity
28 April 2007
Original author
Adrian Godwin
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
218
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ok, so I suppose I'm just slow ..

    I have a Specialised helmet sitting in its box in the garage (it came
    free with the bike, and no I wasn't allowed to have anything else
    instead - I asked). I thought it might come in handy one day.

    I see that it is made in accordance with their <em>PRO</em>fit
    'retention system'. Professional fit, presumably. Or perhaps a
    freudian slip.

    On a related note, and since the other thread has long since gone beyond
    reasonable debate, can someone point me to any documentation on what happens
    when a helmet cracks ? Cyclehelmets.org suggest that energy is not absorbed
    by the helmet and this seems largely reasonable. But it's the most common
    reason for insisting they work ("my helmet cracked but it saved me"😉 and
    features heavily in helmets.org's list of personal tributes. So I'd
    really like to read a paper on just how much energy is absorbed /
    elastically recovered / transmitted when a helmet is used well above
    the magic 15mph threshold, even if we don't know for sure how the
    head is affected by the remaining energy.

    -adrian

  2. Adrian Godwin said:

    Ok, so I suppose I'm just slow ..

    I have a Specialised helmet sitting in its box in the garage (it came
    free with the bike, and no I wasn't allowed to have anything else
    instead - I asked). I thought it might come in handy one day.

    I see that it is made in accordance with their <em>PRO</em>fit
    'retention system'. Professional fit, presumably. Or perhaps a
    freudian slip.

    On a related note, and since the other thread has long since gone beyond
    reasonable debate, can someone point me to any documentation on what happens
    when a helmet cracks ? Cyclehelmets.org suggest that energy is not absorbed
    by the helmet and this seems largely reasonable. But it's the most common
    reason for insisting they work ("my helmet cracked but it saved me"😉 and
    features heavily in helmets.org's list of personal tributes. So I'd
    really like to read a paper on just how much energy is absorbed /
    elastically recovered / transmitted when a helmet is used well above
    the magic 15mph threshold, even if we don't know for sure how the
    head is affected by the remaining energy.

    I don't know about the particular values for a direct head impact but
    a material cracking absorbs virtually no energy whereas a material
    being crushed can absorb rather a lot. A good introduction to
    materials and their failure modes can be found in

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-Materials-Through-Princeton-Library/dp/0691125481/ref=sr_1_2/202-3794026-8621443?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177619624&sr=8-2

    Chris
    --
    Chris Eilbeck

  3. Chris Eilbeck said:
    Adrian Godwin said:

    Ok, so I suppose I'm just slow ..

    Quoted message said:

    I have a Specialised helmet sitting in its box in the garage (it came
    free with the bike, and no I wasn't allowed to have anything else
    instead - I asked). I thought it might come in handy one day.

    Quoted message said:

    I see that it is made in accordance with their <em>PRO</em>fit
    'retention system'. Professional fit, presumably. Or perhaps a
    freudian slip.

    Quoted message said:

    On a related note, and since the other thread has long since gone beyond
    reasonable debate, can someone point me to any documentation on what happens
    when a helmet cracks ? Cyclehelmets.org suggest that energy is not absorbed
    by the helmet and this seems largely reasonable. But it's the most common
    reason for insisting they work ("my helmet cracked but it saved me"😉 and
    features heavily in helmets.org's list of personal tributes. So I'd
    really like to read a paper on just how much energy is absorbed /
    elastically recovered / transmitted when a helmet is used well above
    the magic 15mph threshold, even if we don't know for sure how the
    head is affected by the remaining energy.

    I don't know about the particular values for a direct head impact but
    a material cracking absorbs virtually no energy whereas a material
    being crushed can absorb rather a lot. A good introduction to
    materials and their failure modes can be found in

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-Materials-Through-Princeton-Library/d...

    Of course it is possible to absorb energy both by crushing and
    cracking. Just cracking doesn't absorb much energy. Cracking is not
    indication of a helmet failing to crush. But it is not indicative on
    its own of a large impact. (I can readily crack a helmet in my hands,
    I can't do that to a skull.)

    ...d

  4. David Martin wrote on 26/04/2007 23:24 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    Of course it is possible to absorb energy both by crushing and
    cracking. Just cracking doesn't absorb much energy. Cracking is not
    indication of a helmet failing to crush. But it is not indicative on
    its own of a large impact. (I can readily crack a helmet in my hands,
    I can't do that to a skull.)

    Get a reasonable sized piece of 1" thick polystyrene foam sheet. Try to
    crush part of it to half its original thickness. Now hold it in your
    hands and try to snap it. Which requires more effort?

    --
    Tony

    "The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there
    is no good evidence either way."
    - Bertrand Russell

  5. Chris Eilbeck said:


    I don't know about the particular values for a direct head impact but
    a material cracking absorbs virtually no energy whereas a material
    being crushed can absorb rather a lot. A good introduction to
    materials and their failure modes can be found in

    Yes, I appreciate it's generally true, which is why the usual response
    makes sense. But if helmets are only characterised up to a limited
    speed of impact, someone must have done accelerometer tests to determine
    that they meet 12 or 15 mph (and don't crack at 5mph, for instance).

    David's point that they can crack under much lower non-impact
    stresses applied in the 'wrong' direction (unsupported bend in
    particular) is also good. This could easily crack the side off a
    a helmet in a light glancing blow.

    But I'd like to see an actual measurement of what happens to the head
    in the straightforward (and perhaps oversimplified) case of a straight
    fall onto a test anvil, as the speed approaches and exceeds the point
    where it cracks. This ought to show some absorption due to
    crushing. At higher speeds (and I'd like to know how high) the
    absorption due to crushing will not only become less significant as
    the total energy grows, but may also be reduced if the rate at which
    the foam is able to crush may be limited : i.e. the shock wave from
    the initial impact might travel through the material faster than it
    can crush, resulting in no attenuation at all.

    -adrian

  6. Adrian Godwin said:

    But I'd like to see an actual measurement of what happens to the head
    in the straightforward (and perhaps oversimplified) case of a straight
    fall onto a test anvil, as the speed approaches and exceeds the point
    where it cracks.

    If someone's done this it's likely to be Head Protection Evaluation, who
    do the UK's testing against standards.

    See http://www.hpe.eu.com/

    I see there's a contact form there, you could try asking directly.

    Pete.
    --
    Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
    Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
    Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
    net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/

  7. Adrian Godwin said:

    Ok, so I suppose I'm just slow ..

    I have a Specialised helmet sitting in its box in the garage (it came
    free with the bike, and no I wasn't allowed to have anything else
    instead - I asked). I thought it might come in handy one day.

    I see that it is made in accordance with their <em>PRO</em>fit
    'retention system'. Professional fit, presumably. Or perhaps a
    freudian slip.

    On a related note, and since the other thread has long since gone beyond
    reasonable debate, can someone point me to any documentation on what happens
    when a helmet cracks ? Cyclehelmets.org suggest that energy is not absorbed
    by the helmet and this seems largely reasonable. But it's the most common
    reason for insisting they work ("my helmet cracked but it saved me"😉 and
    features heavily in helmets.org's list of personal tributes. So I'd
    really like to read a paper on just how much energy is absorbed /
    elastically recovered / transmitted when a helmet is used well above
    the magic 15mph threshold, even if we don't know for sure how the
    head is affected by the remaining energy.

    -adrian

    Perhaps this will help

    Mills, N. J., Protective capability of bicycle helmets. Br J Sports
    Med, 1990, 24, 55-60

    John Kane, Kingston ON Canada

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, Adrian Godwin
    [email hidden] says...
    <snip>

    Quoted message said:


    On a related note, and since the other thread has long since gone beyond
    reasonable debate, can someone point me to any documentation on what happens
    when a helmet cracks ? Cyclehelmets.org suggest that energy is not absorbed
    by the helmet and this seems largely reasonable. But it's the most common
    reason for insisting they work ("my helmet cracked but it saved me"😉

    Maybe we should fill our pockets with eggs to prevent other injuries.
    :-)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.