Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it. http://www.ukbikestore.co.uk/acatalog/info%5fsmart%5flam317r%2ehtml
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:15:15 +0100, Tony Raven <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it. http://www.ukbikestore.co.uk/acatalog/info%5fsmart%5flam317r%2ehtml
Best not use them on the roads, then.
The last thing you want is some blind driver piling up behind you 😄
Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it. http://www.ukbikestore.co.uk/acatalog/info%5fsmart%5flam317r%2ehtml
it's the one i have on my commutor bike (big green hybrid) works well as you say very bright.
In article <[email hidden]>, Tony Raven [email hidden] says...
Quoted message said:
Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it.
If you were shining that in my eyes at night I'd probably try to overtake you to make the nuisance go away. Even though I was blinded by the glare.
If you were shining that in my eyes at night I'd probably try to overtake you to make the nuisance go away. Even though I was blinded by the glare.
My experience is the opposite actually. Not with this light but I have a Niterider set with a VERY bright rear light. When I first used it I noticed virtually immediately that whereas before cars would pass me without slowing they were now slowing down behind me and then overtaking with a wide margin. I put it down at the time to them thinking something that bright must be a car with a defective off-side light not a bicycle.
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it. http://www.ukbikestore.co.uk/acatalog/info%5fsmart%5flam317r%2ehtml
Not a good idea if it's likely to blind the car/4x4/truck driver behind you?
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind" - leaving aside idiots in automatics who keep their feet on the brakes with a "high visibility" high-level brake light and don't know how to use a hand brake. Or major idiots with rear (or front) fog lights on for weeks after the fog has cleared...
Stuart Millington wrote on 12/04/2007 00:51 +0100:
Quoted message said:
Tony Raven said:
Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it. http://www.ukbikestore.co.uk/acatalog/info%5fsmart%5flam317r%2ehtml
Not a good idea if it's likely to blind the car/4x4/truck driver behind you?
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind" - leaving aside idiots in automatics who keep their feet on the brakes with a "high visibility" high-level brake light and don't know how to use a hand brake. Or major idiots with rear (or front) fog lights on for weeks after the fog has cleared...
There is a difference between viewing such lights close up and from further way. Small lights drop off in apparent brightness quite quickly with distance compared to the old style big red filament lamp jobbies [1]. All to do with visual acuity and brightness. I doubt in practice they will appear any brighter than some of the very bright brake lights around these days on cars.
[1] Actually they drop off at the same rate but the distance at which they change from constant brightness to brightness decreasing with the square of the distance is much closer for smaller light sources.
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind" - leaving aside idiots in automatics who keep their feet on the brakes with a "high visibility" high-level brake light and don't know how to use a hand brake.
Which automatics have a hand brake?
Cheers, Luke
-- Lincoln City 0-2 Southend United (AET) Swansea City 2-2 Southend United We went up twice with Tilly and Brush
Stuart Millington wrote on 12/04/2007 00:51 +0100:
Quoted message said:
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind"
Not for some time as I know they can be exceedingly bright and avoid looking directly at them. Doesn't mean I don't know they are there though. When did you last look directly at oncoming car headlights and what did that do for your vision? There are lots of very bright lights out there on motor vehicles and I have no problem with having a rear and front light that stands out equally.
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
"Ekul Namsob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Stuart Millington said:
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind" - leaving aside idiots in automatics who keep their feet on the brakes with a "high visibility" high-level brake light and don't know how to use a hand brake.
Which automatics have a hand brake?
Most of them. Those which don't have a suitable foot brake which serves the same purpose instead. It's one of the rules for cars that such a system is fitted. They also have Park. HTH.
Stuart Millington wrote on 12/04/2007 00:51 +0100:
Quoted message said:
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind" - leaving aside idiots in automatics who keep their feet on the brakes with a "high visibility" high-level brake light and don't know how to use a hand brake. Or major idiots with rear (or front) fog lights on for weeks after the fog has cleared...
[...] I doubt in practice they will appear any brighter than some of the very bright brake lights around these days on cars.
Exactly the lights Stuart complained about being used inappropriately. Bright brake lights aren't used continuously while a car is moving, and bright fog lights shouldn't be in good visibility. Normal tail lights aren't that bright.
I'd looked at the same light in an LBS and considered it for use in fog, but for use in clear conditions I think you would at least have to mount it fairly low for it not to be potentially annoying. (Or point it downwards, which would lose the whole point of long range visibility.)
Blimey Tony I thought you were the clever one here!
(I nearly said bright, but what with blimey it was just too much to chuckle over)
P
Tony Raven said:
Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it. ukbikestore.co.ukinfo%5fsmart%5flam317r%2ehtmlOpen ↗
-- Tony
"The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way." - Bertrand Russell
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind" - leaving aside idiots in automatics who keep their feet on the brakes with a "high visibility" high-level brake light and don't know how to use a hand brake.
Which automatics have a hand brake?
Cheers, Luke
-- Lincoln City 0-2 Southend United (AET) Swansea City 2-2 Southend United We went up twice with Tilly and Brush[/QUOTE]
I note your later post, but when did you last look at "normal" tail lights on a car/4x4/truck and see dark spots/"go blind" - leaving aside idiots in automatics who keep their feet on the brakes with a "high visibility" high-level brake light and don't know how to use a hand brake.
Which automatics have a hand brake?
Quoted message said:
The ones with a UK spec.
Mine doesn't and it's UK spec. I have a foot-operated parking brake instead. My point, for the benefit of those who need it pointing out, is that it's a bit rich to accuse people of being 'idiots in automatics who [...] don't know how to use a hand brake' from a position of ignorance.
FWIW, I use the parking brake at lights.
Cheers, Luke
-- Lincoln City 0-2 Southend United (AET) Swansea City 2-2 Southend United We went up twice with Tilly and Brush
There is a difference between viewing such lights close up and from further way. Small lights drop off in apparent brightness quite quickly with distance compared to the old style big red filament lamp jobbies
True and if mounted low enough, as Alan suggests, that someone (driver or cyclist) immediately behind the bicycle would not have them in line-of-sight then it would not be bad.
However, if mounted at saddle level, it could be as bad as someone sitting with their foot on the brakes in a car with a high-level brake light.
Quoted message said:
[1]. All to do with visual acuity and brightness. I doubt in practice they will appear any brighter than some of the very bright brake lights around these days on cars.
Indeed and these are very hard to avoid if you're sitting in traffic behind someone with one on waiting for traffic lights to change.
Mine doesn't and it's UK spec. I have a foot-operated parking brake instead.
Which is the same thing by a different name (and method of activation, obviously). I do have a vague recollection of the Ford Capri's (or something of that era) having a dashboard mounted one. But, I don't recall any of the ones I've seen not having one at all.
Quoted message said:
My point, for the benefit of those who need it pointing out, is that it's a bit rich to accuse people of being 'idiots in automatics who [...] don't know how to use a hand brake' from a position of ignorance.
See above.
Quoted message said:
FWIW, I use the parking brake at lights.
You're the only driver of a car with an automatic gearbox that I've ever known or heard of who does then.
Having read some reports el swear I ordered myself a couple of the Smart 1/2W Superflash rear lights from UK Bike Store (£11.99ea + £1 postage total). I still have the dark spots in my vision from when I made the mistake of switching one on while looking at it. http://www.ukbikestore.co.uk/acatalog/info%5fsmart%5flam317r%2ehtml
they are a bit bright. I did the same, it took about 5 minutes to get rid of the red spots
You're the only driver of a car with an automatic gearbox that I've ever known or heard of who does then.
How do you recognise these automatics?
"known or heard of" in the above relates to the drivers of the vehicles - i.e. I know people and speak to them, sometimes I'm even a passenger and, therefore, a witness to their non-use of hand brakes ;-)