Is this copyrighted or trademarked? If so, by whom? Or are we free to use it anyway?
I've seen it written with "rules" and "rights" switched, but the other way makes more sense, and is better copywriting.
Matt O.
If you are referring to the ever-present motor-car/cycle debate, "same rights" is wrong; as cyclists (in most parts of the world) use the road by right, whereas motorists use it by permission.
And of course, "same rules" is frequently wrong as well.
Is this copyrighted or trademarked? If so, by whom? Or are we free to use it anyway?
I've seen it written with "rules" and "rights" switched, but the other way makes more sense, and is better copywriting.
Matt O.
If you are referring to the ever-present motor-car/cycle debate, "same rights" is wrong; as cyclists (in most parts of the world) use the road by right, whereas motorists use it by permission.
And of course, "same rules" is frequently wrong as well.
I'm not referring to any debate. I asked a direct question about copyright or trademark, on either version of this phrase. Does anyone have an answer?
Matt O'Toole wrote: :: "Same roads, same rules, same rights"... :: :: Is this copyrighted or trademarked? If so, by whom? Or are we free :: to use it anyway? :: :: I've seen it written with "rules" and "rights" switched, but the :: other way makes more sense, and is better copywriting. :: :: Matt O.
Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every road, just as do all other users. Nothing more is expected. Nothing less is acceptable.
--
David L. Johnson
"Business!" cried the Ghost. "Mankind was my business. The common welfare was my business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence, were, all, my business. The dealings of my trade were but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of my business!" --Dickens,