I can't see why they're any better at distributing efford around the rim hole - specially if you have eyelets on the holes - than the round head nipples...
Besides, given the diferent shape of the head, does its size allow for equal fit in the rim hole/eyelet, or do they require slightly longer spokes?
TIA, jbr
Ride your 2 wheels, but in order to ride them yet another day! bbb
I can't see why they're any better at distributing efford around the rim hole - specially if you have eyelets on the holes - than the round head nipples...
No difference there.
Quoted message said:
Besides, given the diferent shape of the head, does its size allow for equal fit in the rim hole/eyelet,
The DT ones do.
Quoted message said:
or do they require slightly longer spokes?
If the head is taller you get more threads inside, so a longer spoke is optional but the normal spoke length is still okay.
I like hex head nipples because they don't round as easily as the square flats do.
Werehatrack, AFAIK, most machine-laced wheels use the slot in the head to install the nipples. Then machine-truing (at least Holland and Mach 1 machines I've seen) normally use the square flats. So in my experience wrenches outside the rim (on the hex) are mostly turned by hand.
I like hex head nipples because they don't round as easily as the square flats do.
That's only if you removed the tyre and airtube, and have one of those "weered" tools for turning the nipples from inside the rim. except for the DT hexagonal spokes, which aparently can stillbe turned with a screw driver, but I'm not sure if that's possible a high tensile strenght.
OK, I'm relaxed now with my round nipples :-)
Thanks, jbr
Ride your 2 wheels, but in order to ride them yet another day! bbb