j walen said:John Gorentz said:
The UniversalMaps for other states are not like those for Michigan. I've used the Ohio and
Indiana ones for riding, but they do not show the level of detail that the Michigan ones do.
Odd - you'd think when they got a useful format (as I said - they're sold everywhere in Mich)
they'd standardize it. Oh well.
It's not just a matter of format. It's also the information content. I'm sure it costs a lot more to
gather the kind of information they put in the Michigan maps.
Even the Michigan maps are of uneven quality. The maps for some parts of the state have more
information (and a more aesthetically pleasing format) than others.
I think I even know what part of the state their main cartographer comes from, but the UniversalMap
people won't help me confirm it. I was once amazed at the level of historical detail that was shown
on one of the maps. I was on a bike tour to do some history research, had forgotten my road maps at
home, so ended up picking up one of the Universal Maps, which were just then (AFAIK) starting to
appear in gas stations. I sat in a restaurant looking at it with my wife. It became apparent that
this guy knew about historical sites that I didn't think anyone else but me cared about.
Afterwards I e-mailed to the UniversalMap people, commenting on the level of historical detail,
wanting to find out who it was who knew and cared about all these places. They wouldn't tell me,
just saying that it was done under contract, and something to the effect that it was proprietary
information. As I've studied these maps more closely since then, I've concluded that one part of
the state has a lot more of this level of detail than any of the others do, so I'm now slightly
less impressed. I figure the person must know his/her home area very well. I still wish I could
meet him/her.
I agree. It would be wonderful if UniversalMap could make the same types of maps for other states.
John Gorentz