Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Funny Bike Conversion

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 7 posts · 557 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
7 February 2007
Last activity
9 February 2007
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
557
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've got a steel TT bike from back when funny bike configuration with
    700c rear and smaller fronts were common. Given the front wheel is
    650c, I'm thinking of converting it to a standard 700c fork. Anyone
    tried this or know if the slight elevation in the front end will be as
    minimal as I suspect it would be? I haven't quite decided if I would
    use it as a road bike or a legal TT bike. (kinda hard before riding
    it...) I'd appreciate some wisdom before going ahead with the HS/fork
    replacement.

    Josh

  2. Quoted message said:

    I've got a steel TT bike from back when funny bike configuration with
    700c rear and smaller fronts were common. Given the front wheel is
    650c, I'm thinking of converting it to a standard 700c fork. Anyone
    tried this or know if the slight elevation in the front end will be as
    minimal as I suspect it would be? I haven't quite decided if I would
    use it as a road bike or a legal TT bike. (kinda hard before riding
    it...) I'd appreciate some wisdom before going ahead with the HS/fork
    replacement.

    Ideally, you could do a drawing. But if a suitable fork is handy, just
    try it. You'll most likely find your new lower head angle ( with a
    taller fork) wants an excessively long rake to keep trial constant
    (~~50mm). The long rakes are generally found on touring forks with even
    taller clearance so it may be hard to keep up with the head angle change
    looking for more trail. The result may handle poorly with skimpy trail.
    Or not.

    If you can experiment with stuff you already own this may be
    interesting. I would not pay for any standard fork for such a project.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  3. Quoted message said:

    I've got a steel TT bike from back when funny bike configuration with
    700c rear and smaller fronts were common. Given the front wheel is
    650c, I'm thinking of converting it to a standard 700c fork. Anyone
    tried this or know if the slight elevation in the front end will be as
    minimal as I suspect it would be? I haven't quite decided if I would
    use it as a road bike or a legal TT bike. (kinda hard before riding
    it...) I'd appreciate some wisdom before going ahead with the HS/fork
    replacement.

    Josh

    I've gone the other way (700C to 650C fork and tire). IIRC, I
    calculated the head angle change as 4 degrees. It sure felt about that
    -- in my case it went from slightly slow to very quick handling,
    though you're going the other way so it "might" be tolerable. Andy's
    right tough: look for lots of rake and don't pay anything unless
    you've tried it first.

    On the other hand, I've used a bumper jack to bend steel frames to
    change head angle too...

  4. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've got a steel TT bike from back when funny bike configuration with
    700c rear and smaller fronts were common. Given the front wheel is
    650c, I'm thinking of converting it to a standard 700c fork. Anyone
    tried this or know if the slight elevation in the front end will be as
    minimal as I suspect it would be? I haven't quite decided if I would
    use it as a road bike or a legal TT bike. (kinda hard before riding
    it...) I'd appreciate some wisdom before going ahead with the HS/fork
    replacement.

    Quoted message said:

    I've gone the other way (700C to 650C fork and tire). IIRC, I
    calculated the head angle change as 4 degrees. It sure felt about that
    -- in my case it went from slightly slow to very quick handling,
    though you're going the other way so it "might" be tolerable. Andy's
    right tough: look for lots of rake and don't pay anything unless
    you've tried it first.

    On the other hand, I've used a bumper jack to bend steel frames to
    change head angle too...

    I assume you were _restoring_ the original head angle after a crash and
    not 'upgrading' an otherwise sound frame ???

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  5. A Muzi said:
    Quoted message said:

    On Feb 7, 12:48 pm, [email hidden] wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    On the other hand, I've used a bumper jack to bend steel frames to
    change head angle too...

    I assume you were _restoring_ the original head angle after a crash and
    not 'upgrading' an otherwise sound frame ???

    Either way.... Yikes!

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $795 ti frame

  6. A Muzi said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've got a steel TT bike from back when funny bike configuration with
    700c rear and smaller fronts were common. Given the front wheel is
    650c, I'm thinking of converting it to a standard 700c fork. Anyone
    tried this or know if the slight elevation in the front end will be as
    minimal as I suspect it would be? I haven't quite decided if I would
    use it as a road bike or a legal TT bike. (kinda hard before riding
    it...) I'd appreciate some wisdom before going ahead with the HS/fork
    replacement.

    Ideally, you could do a drawing. But if a suitable fork is handy, just
    try it. You'll most likely find your new lower head angle ( with a
    taller fork) wants an excessively long rake to keep trial constant
    (~~50mm). The long rakes are generally found on touring forks with even
    taller clearance so it may be hard to keep up with the head angle change
    looking for more trail. The result may handle poorly with skimpy trail.
    Or not.

    If you can experiment with stuff you already own this may be
    interesting. I would not pay for any standard fork for such a project.

    --
    Andrew Muziwww.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    Yes, I can experiment with parts I already have. My plan was to put a
    Kinesis aero (aluminum) fork on it but the rake does not look very
    long, at least by sight. The handling was indeed my main concern as
    the only thing scarier than riding a TT setup with insufficient trail
    would be riding no hands on a TT bike (which I foolishly did on my
    first TT bike thinking it would be similar to a road bike)

    I am confused by Andy's response as I thought that elevating the front
    would increase the trail by pushing forward point B in the diagram :
    http://www.prodigalchild.net/Bicycle6.htm#Shimmy

    Thus in order to increase or maintain trail, a fork of the same or
    lower rake/offset would be required. No?

    Theoretically, I can modify the rake of a steel fork with the Park
    fork-bending tool that I have, but don't want to be bending forks if I
    don't have to.

  7. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've got a steel TT bike from back when funny bike configuration with
    700c rear and smaller fronts were common. Given the front wheel is
    650c, I'm thinking of converting it to a standard 700c fork. Anyone
    tried this or know if the slight elevation in the front end will be as
    minimal as I suspect it would be? I haven't quite decided if I would
    use it as a road bike or a legal TT bike. (kinda hard before riding
    it...) I'd appreciate some wisdom before going ahead with the HS/fork
    replacement.

    Quoted message said:
    A Muzi said:

    Ideally, you could do a drawing. But if a suitable fork is handy, just
    try it. You'll most likely find your new lower head angle ( with a
    taller fork) wants an excessively long rake to keep trial constant
    (~~50mm). The long rakes are generally found on touring forks with even
    taller clearance so it may be hard to keep up with the head angle change
    looking for more trail. The result may handle poorly with skimpy trail.
    Or not.
    If you can experiment with stuff you already own this may be
    interesting. I would not pay for any standard fork for such a project.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, I can experiment with parts I already have. My plan was to put a
    Kinesis aero (aluminum) fork on it but the rake does not look very
    long, at least by sight. The handling was indeed my main concern as
    the only thing scarier than riding a TT setup with insufficient trail
    would be riding no hands on a TT bike (which I foolishly did on my
    first TT bike thinking it would be similar to a road bike)
    I am confused by Andy's response as I thought that elevating the front
    would increase the trail by pushing forward point B in the diagram :
    http://www.prodigalchild.net/Bicycle6.htm#Shimmy
    Thus in order to increase or maintain trail, a fork of the same or
    lower rake/offset would be required. No?
    Theoretically, I can modify the rake of a steel fork with the Park
    fork-bending tool that I have, but don't want to be bending forks if I
    don't have to.

    That drawing is a great link for this project of yours.
    When you raise the front (650C=>700C), the head angle goes lower (e.g.,
    74 deg=>70deg). Point B in your drawing moves forward. Adding rake
    brings it back, hopefully to about 50mm.

    Generally steeper angles need less rake, lower angles , more rake. In
    your specific case, since a typical road fork rake of 40~45mm will be
    about the same rake as your typical 650C tri fork, your new head angle
    will add way too much trail. A more ample rake will reduce that
    hopefully back to the same 50mm value with which you began. Sketch it
    and see! [p.s. don't bend that aluminum fork!] Before making a mandrel
    to shape steel blades, see what free long-rake forks are available to
    you. Curving the blades shortens the axle-to-brake bolt length.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.