Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Mountain Bikers Try to Justify Illegal Trail-Building

Started by Mike Vandeman · · Last activity · 6 posts · 574 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
8 February 2007
Last activity
10 February 2007
Original author
Mike Vandeman
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
574
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In other words, illegal trail building is okay, but SHODDY illegal
    trailbuilding gives mountain bikers a bad name!

    Mike

    To: [email hidden]
    From: "Thom Iverson" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:52:53 -0800
    Subject: Re: Grey Trails

    This is a point I DEFINITELY agree with!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    People slapping down SHODDY gray trail and then walking away without
    ANY
    followup maintenance DOES get me torqued off. THAT gives a bad image
    for
    mtn biking.
    IMHO

    Thom I

    Quoted message said:

    From: "mwestra2" <[email hidden]>
    Subject: Re: Grey Trails
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:31:55 -0000

    This is a great topic and I'd love to hear all sides. Here's my 2 Pesos
    on Building Grey....

    Quoted message said:

    **AND** MAINTAIN WHAT YOU BUILD!! By yourself or with your crew or via
    work parties. If you don't have the time to keep it maintained, you
    shouldn't build it in the first place. The worst: finding a dangerous
    rotting dilapidated eyesore of a ladder bridge out in the woods!

    The Code of the Streets: Whatever you do, don't "rat" on your buddy,
    even if he is doing something illegal!

    Mike

    From: "Ethan" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:13:25 -0000
    Subject: Re: Gray Trails and trail advocacy

    Hmm... if I had to break down into three groups, and then guess as to
    the percentages of, American trails that were built by various
    movements/entities, I'd have to guess the following:

    5% -- the CCC
    20% -- other government agencies, or at least groups with official
    landowner/government approval
    75% -- gray trails, built by unofficial, average Joes and Janes ....
    and much of that by hunters, trappers, and other explorers, plus of
    course the ancient/native inhabitants of the continent.

    (I'd be very interested to seem to stats on this, if anyone could dig
    them up somewhere.) Regardless tho, I'd definitley agree with what
    someone said earlier in this thread about how "gray trails belong in
    gray areas" -- lands that only have marginal (or temporary)
    recreational access, period.

    Anyway, on to recent events in the Cascade foothills... So Dave,
    when you called the county folks to report the new trail you'd found,
    I really hope you didn't mention that you'd *met* the trail builders,
    and that they were mountain bikers. Cause that would of course be
    incongruous with the overall goal that we all have to not portray
    mountain bikers in a bad light.

    And to all those who seek to "verbally educate" naughty rogue trail
    builders or other people who are doing things you don't approve of,
    always remember the age-old maxim, "It's not what you say, it's how-
    you-say-it."

    Since I wasn't there, Dave, I'm not sure what your tone/approach was
    in educating these "evil-doers" (to borrow a term that our esteemed
    president likes to use).

    However, a few years ago, I was at a wintertime work party on the
    Preston Trail and, at one point in the day, a couple of guys came
    riding down the trail, past us. One of the crew leaders said to
    them, in an angry, belligerent tone: "HEY YOU POACHERS, THIS TRAIL IS
    CLOSED!!!" My jaw dropped. I couldn't believe what I'd just
    observed. How does this person, who also happens to be a board
    member and one of the club's top, uh, "advocates", expect to attract
    new members to the club and new trail gnomes to the trailwork
    movement... when [he/she] talks like that? Unbelievable.

    EE

    From: "Brian" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:08:26 -0800
    Subject: Re: Gray Trails and trail advocacy

    Trails have always been developed for the same reason as long as man
    has been on earth... necessity.
    Lets face it, we need more trails, much much Much more. I say kudos to
    pirate trails and kudos to those [censored] about them, maybe after another
    10 years of BS our county and state land managers will finely see that
    there is a need for more access for cyclists, but dont hold your
    breath. We will always be the red headded [censored] step children of the
    outdoor community... I say build them where they have a chance to last
    and away from wet areas, but build them. Make the complainers, Tom
    Murdochs and serria club members work to weed them out as they are
    descoverd. Maybe they will get tired after a while.
    Look at skate borders for example, they grind and destroy brickwork
    and store fronts. After years and years of complaining and relentless,
    non conforming skaters, we finely see skate parks poping up all over
    the place. This group got exactly what they wanted by doing what they
    wanted, where they wanted, when they wanted.
    I'm not saying its cool to destory the environment we wish to enjoy, I
    think most of us are environmentalists... Thats the whole point! We
    want to see more birds, more trees, more creeks, more views, We just
    want more. The building of "gray trails, pirate trails and illegal
    trails" just goes to show that the slow turning wheels of politics,
    talking and environmental impact studies is not working for some. I
    know its not working for me, I dont build pirate or gray trails but I
    understand them and I'll ride them in a heartbeat.
    My $0.02

    From: "art bbtc" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:03:06 -0800
    Subject: Re: Op-Ed on gray trails vs official trails

    Just a few comments-

    Thanks Maartin for making all good points.

    Novelty Hill was a battle we lost; the trails built there were despite
    our efforts. The "paths" there would be a lot different had we
    prevailed.

    St. Ed is a good example of what this thread is about- Rampant illicit
    trail building forcing greater scrutiny of the land manager and
    resulting in removal of even the small log hops.

    Tiger Mt.- The dinosaur teeth "trail work" is the unintended result of
    well intentioned people putting rock in the trail outside of directed
    workparties. It takes a lot of work to properly embed rock in the
    tread so it is sustainable and fun to ride.

    Colonnade will be a cool place to ride and it will highlight our
    success, but more than that it will open the door to other
    opportunities so that the future highlight of our success can be a
    true Backcountry trail.

    Definition of a grey trail- is it grey or gray?

    -Art
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  2. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In other words, illegal trail building is okay, but SHODDY illegal
    trailbuilding gives mountain bikers a bad name!

    Mike

    To: [email hidden]
    From: "Thom Iverson" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:52:53 -0800
    Subject: Re: Grey Trails

    This is a point I DEFINITELY agree with!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    People slapping down SHODDY gray trail and then walking away without
    ANY
    followup maintenance DOES get me torqued off. THAT gives a bad image
    for
    mtn biking.
    IMHO

    Thom I

    Quoted message said:

    From: "mwestra2" <[email hidden]>
    Subject: Re: Grey Trails
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:31:55 -0000

    This is a great topic and I'd love to hear all sides. Here's my 2 Pesos
    on Building Grey....

    Quoted message said:

    **AND** MAINTAIN WHAT YOU BUILD!! By yourself or with your crew or via
    work parties. If you don't have the time to keep it maintained, you
    shouldn't build it in the first place. The worst: finding a dangerous
    rotting dilapidated eyesore of a ladder bridge out in the woods!

    The Code of the Streets: Whatever you do, don't "rat" on your buddy,
    even if he is doing something illegal!

    Mike

    From: "Ethan" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:13:25 -0000
    Subject: Re: Gray Trails and trail advocacy

    Hmm... if I had to break down into three groups, and then guess as to
    the percentages of, American trails that were built by various
    movements/entities, I'd have to guess the following:

    5% -- the CCC
    20% -- other government agencies, or at least groups with official
    landowner/government approval
    75% -- gray trails, built by unofficial, average Joes and Janes ....
    and much of that by hunters, trappers, and other explorers, plus of
    course the ancient/native inhabitants of the continent.

    (I'd be very interested to seem to stats on this, if anyone could dig
    them up somewhere.) Regardless tho, I'd definitley agree with what
    someone said earlier in this thread about how "gray trails belong in
    gray areas" -- lands that only have marginal (or temporary)
    recreational access, period.

    Anyway, on to recent events in the Cascade foothills... So Dave,
    when you called the county folks to report the new trail you'd found,
    I really hope you didn't mention that you'd *met* the trail builders,
    and that they were mountain bikers. Cause that would of course be
    incongruous with the overall goal that we all have to not portray
    mountain bikers in a bad light.

    And to all those who seek to "verbally educate" naughty rogue trail
    builders or other people who are doing things you don't approve of,
    always remember the age-old maxim, "It's not what you say, it's how-
    you-say-it."

    Since I wasn't there, Dave, I'm not sure what your tone/approach was
    in educating these "evil-doers" (to borrow a term that our esteemed
    president likes to use).

    However, a few years ago, I was at a wintertime work party on the
    Preston Trail and, at one point in the day, a couple of guys came
    riding down the trail, past us. One of the crew leaders said to
    them, in an angry, belligerent tone: "HEY YOU POACHERS, THIS TRAIL IS
    CLOSED!!!" My jaw dropped. I couldn't believe what I'd just
    observed. How does this person, who also happens to be a board
    member and one of the club's top, uh, "advocates", expect to attract
    new members to the club and new trail gnomes to the trailwork
    movement... when [he/she] talks like that? Unbelievable.

    EE

    From: "Brian" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:08:26 -0800
    Subject: Re: Gray Trails and trail advocacy

    Trails have always been developed for the same reason as long as man
    has been on earth... necessity.
    Lets face it, we need more trails, much much Much more. I say kudos to
    pirate trails and kudos to those [censored] about them, maybe after another
    10 years of BS our county and state land managers will finely see that
    there is a need for more access for cyclists, but dont hold your
    breath. We will always be the red headded [censored] step children of the
    outdoor community... I say build them where they have a chance to last
    and away from wet areas, but build them. Make the complainers, Tom
    Murdochs and serria club members work to weed them out as they are
    descoverd. Maybe they will get tired after a while.
    Look at skate borders for example, they grind and destroy brickwork
    and store fronts. After years and years of complaining and relentless,
    non conforming skaters, we finely see skate parks poping up all over
    the place. This group got exactly what they wanted by doing what they
    wanted, where they wanted, when they wanted.
    I'm not saying its cool to destory the environment we wish to enjoy, I
    think most of us are environmentalists... Thats the whole point! We
    want to see more birds, more trees, more creeks, more views, We just
    want more. The building of "gray trails, pirate trails and illegal
    trails" just goes to show that the slow turning wheels of politics,
    talking and environmental impact studies is not working for some. I
    know its not working for me, I dont build pirate or gray trails but I
    understand them and I'll ride them in a heartbeat.
    My $0.02

    From: "art bbtc" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:03:06 -0800
    Subject: Re: Op-Ed on gray trails vs official trails

    Just a few comments-

    Thanks Maartin for making all good points.

    Novelty Hill was a battle we lost; the trails built there were despite
    our efforts. The "paths" there would be a lot different had we
    prevailed.

    St. Ed is a good example of what this thread is about- Rampant illicit
    trail building forcing greater scrutiny of the land manager and
    resulting in removal of even the small log hops.

    Tiger Mt.- The dinosaur teeth "trail work" is the unintended result of
    well intentioned people putting rock in the trail outside of directed
    workparties. It takes a lot of work to properly embed rock in the
    tread so it is sustainable and fun to ride.

    Colonnade will be a cool place to ride and it will highlight our
    success, but more than that it will open the door to other
    opportunities so that the future highlight of our success can be a
    true Backcountry trail.

    Definition of a grey trail- is it grey or gray?

    -Art
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are
    fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  3. JP said:


    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In other words, illegal trail building is okay, but SHODDY illegal
    trailbuilding gives mountain bikers a bad name!

    Mike

    To: [email hidden]
    From: "Thom Iverson" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:52:53 -0800
    Subject: Re: Grey Trails

    This is a point I DEFINITELY agree with!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    People slapping down SHODDY gray trail and then walking away without
    ANY
    followup maintenance DOES get me torqued off. THAT gives a bad image
    for
    mtn biking.
    IMHO

    Thom I

    Quoted message said:

    From: "mwestra2" <[email hidden]>
    Subject: Re: Grey Trails
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 15:31:55 -0000

    This is a great topic and I'd love to hear all sides. Here's my 2 Pesos
    on Building Grey....

    Quoted message said:

    **AND** MAINTAIN WHAT YOU BUILD!! By yourself or with your crew or via
    work parties. If you don't have the time to keep it maintained, you
    shouldn't build it in the first place. The worst: finding a dangerous
    rotting dilapidated eyesore of a ladder bridge out in the woods!

    The Code of the Streets: Whatever you do, don't "rat" on your buddy,
    even if he is doing something illegal!

    Mike

    From: "Ethan" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:13:25 -0000
    Subject: Re: Gray Trails and trail advocacy

    Hmm... if I had to break down into three groups, and then guess as to
    the percentages of, American trails that were built by various
    movements/entities, I'd have to guess the following:

    5% -- the CCC
    20% -- other government agencies, or at least groups with official
    landowner/government approval
    75% -- gray trails, built by unofficial, average Joes and Janes ....
    and much of that by hunters, trappers, and other explorers, plus of
    course the ancient/native inhabitants of the continent.

    (I'd be very interested to seem to stats on this, if anyone could dig
    them up somewhere.) Regardless tho, I'd definitley agree with what
    someone said earlier in this thread about how "gray trails belong in
    gray areas" -- lands that only have marginal (or temporary)
    recreational access, period.

    Anyway, on to recent events in the Cascade foothills... So Dave,
    when you called the county folks to report the new trail you'd found,
    I really hope you didn't mention that you'd *met* the trail builders,
    and that they were mountain bikers. Cause that would of course be
    incongruous with the overall goal that we all have to not portray
    mountain bikers in a bad light.

    And to all those who seek to "verbally educate" naughty rogue trail
    builders or other people who are doing things you don't approve of,
    always remember the age-old maxim, "It's not what you say, it's how-
    you-say-it."

    Since I wasn't there, Dave, I'm not sure what your tone/approach was
    in educating these "evil-doers" (to borrow a term that our esteemed
    president likes to use).

    However, a few years ago, I was at a wintertime work party on the
    Preston Trail and, at one point in the day, a couple of guys came
    riding down the trail, past us. One of the crew leaders said to
    them, in an angry, belligerent tone: "HEY YOU POACHERS, THIS TRAIL IS
    CLOSED!!!" My jaw dropped. I couldn't believe what I'd just
    observed. How does this person, who also happens to be a board
    member and one of the club's top, uh, "advocates", expect to attract
    new members to the club and new trail gnomes to the trailwork
    movement... when [he/she] talks like that? Unbelievable.

    EE

    From: "Brian" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:08:26 -0800
    Subject: Re: Gray Trails and trail advocacy

    Trails have always been developed for the same reason as long as man
    has been on earth... necessity.
    Lets face it, we need more trails, much much Much more. I say kudos to
    pirate trails and kudos to those [censored] about them, maybe after another
    10 years of BS our county and state land managers will finely see that
    there is a need for more access for cyclists, but dont hold your
    breath. We will always be the red headded [censored] step children of the
    outdoor community... I say build them where they have a chance to last
    and away from wet areas, but build them. Make the complainers, Tom
    Murdochs and serria club members work to weed them out as they are
    descoverd. Maybe they will get tired after a while.
    Look at skate borders for example, they grind and destroy brickwork
    and store fronts. After years and years of complaining and relentless,
    non conforming skaters, we finely see skate parks poping up all over
    the place. This group got exactly what they wanted by doing what they
    wanted, where they wanted, when they wanted.
    I'm not saying its cool to destory the environment we wish to enjoy, I
    think most of us are environmentalists... Thats the whole point! We
    want to see more birds, more trees, more creeks, more views, We just
    want more. The building of "gray trails, pirate trails and illegal
    trails" just goes to show that the slow turning wheels of politics,
    talking and environmental impact studies is not working for some. I
    know its not working for me, I dont build pirate or gray trails but I
    understand them and I'll ride them in a heartbeat.
    My $0.02

    From: "art bbtc" <[email hidden]>
    Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:03:06 -0800
    Subject: Re: Op-Ed on gray trails vs official trails

    Just a few comments-

    Thanks Maartin for making all good points.

    Novelty Hill was a battle we lost; the trails built there were despite
    our efforts. The "paths" there would be a lot different had we
    prevailed.

    St. Ed is a good example of what this thread is about- Rampant illicit
    trail building forcing greater scrutiny of the land manager and
    resulting in removal of even the small log hops.

    Tiger Mt.- The dinosaur teeth "trail work" is the unintended result of
    well intentioned people putting rock in the trail outside of directed
    workparties. It takes a lot of work to properly embed rock in the
    tread so it is sustainable and fun to ride.

    Colonnade will be a cool place to ride and it will highlight our
    success, but more than that it will open the door to other
    opportunities so that the future highlight of our success can be a
    true Backcountry trail.

    Definition of a grey trail- is it grey or gray?

    -Art
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are
    fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande


    Except that this was all written by mountain bikers!
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  4. Thanks, Mikey, for highlighting the efforts of off-road cyclists to police
    the activity of rogue trails and illegal riding. The post you made shows
    great cooperation and communication among responsible cyclists to work
    within the system of guidelines.
    It is these efforts that have been beneficial in dispelling the
    misconceptions of non-cyclists.

  5. On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 13:52:34 -0500, "S Curtiss" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Thanks, Mikey, for highlighting the efforts of off-road cyclists to police
    the activity of rogue trails and illegal riding. The post you made shows
    great cooperation and communication among responsible cyclists to work
    within the system of guidelines.
    It is these efforts that have been beneficial in dispelling the
    misconceptions of non-cyclists.

    I guess you didn't read it, because it said that mountain bikers
    support illegal trailbuilding.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  6. I read a discussion on curbing the illegal trails. I also read a post
    encouraging trails at any opportunity followed by a post on proper
    discussion with land managers for trail building.

    Hardly all negative as you attempt to portray. Actually, it is mostly
    positive.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.