Beth:
I've been thinking about getting a pair of lederhosen and calling them my "cycling leathers." Maybe
it'll catch on.
Seriously though, a bike helmet probably would *not* save your life in an otherwise fatal accident,
but there isn't much doubt that it reduces the severity of cosmetic injuries and other traumas. I
went down on a moped sans helmet, and spent the next six weeks telling people why my head was
bandaged. A few years later I went down on a motorcycle at 65 mph wearing a helmet, leathers and
gloves and just had a painful impact injury to my knee, but virtually no other visible sign of the
accident. No road burn, other than a small patch on my elbow where the leather was torn. (The helmet
was a little more substantial than a cycling helmet, though. But the same controversy exists in the
motorcycle community.)
No, I'm not in favor of a mandatory helmet law. Maybe mandatory lederhosen, though.
--
--Scott [email hidden] Cut the "tail" to send email.
"BethF" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Doug Huffman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Perhaps the subject should have been "D. S. will wear his helmet." The conspiracy of ignorance
masquerades as common sense. I would hate to
have
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:to add a.r.b.r. to the hell-mutt rule.
So you think that if this guy had worn his helmet that he STILL would have been incoherent?