Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

The MJV Guide to Usenet

Started by RpJ · · Last activity · 1 post · 437 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
3 February 2007
Last activity
3 February 2007
Original author
RpJ
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
437
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. TROLL.SIG last modified: 10-1-2000

    Troll: (Also known as an MJV - not to be confused with an SUV)
    A deliberately disrupting, confused and incorrect
    post, or one posting trolls to a Usenet group to
    generate a flurry of responses from people called
    "billygoats" trying to set the record straight.
    Other trollers enter the fray adding more and more
    misinformation so that the thread eventually dies of
    strangulation. Trolls/trollers cannot be affected
    by facts nor logic.

    ////////////////////
    From: J Wootton <[email hidden]>
    Newsgroups: sci.environment
    Subject: How to argue on Usenet
    Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:50:04 GMT

    http://www.brunching.com/features/feature-argueusenet.html

    People come up and talk to me, usually on public transit, wanting to
    know how to access the newsgroups on the Internet so the terrible urges
    will go away. I try to give these people what help I can stand, but it
    saddens and distracts me to know how many out there don't know how to
    properly behave on that great landfill of the intellect known as Usenet.
    It is for them that this guide was created.

    Picking a Battle

    Feel free to argue about anything that interests you, but keep this in
    mind: you have a moral obligation to challenge people's assumptions,
    particularly the assumption that they're not morons. So make sure that
    you pick the newsgroup where the most people are going to disagree with
    you. A simple template for your first post: "People who are into [insert
    subject of newsgroup] are such losers!"

    A Life, The Getting Thereof

    There are only two valid activities in this world: personally attending
    to the injured and hungry, and picking fights in newsgroups. Everything
    else -- from political protest to playing "go" -- indicates someone who
    has too much spare time and needs to get a life. Point this out to them:
    they'll thank you for it later.

    Censorship

    Whenever anyone calls you a chowderhead, tells you they've heard more
    coherent statements from randomly arranged Scrabble tiles, or disagrees
    with you, they are practicing censorship. People who believe in free
    speech keep their opinions to themselves. Except you, of course.

    Your Opponents

    Remember, the forces of those who disagree with you are a monolith of
    credulity and/or scepticism. You can freely assume that any one of them
    is a spokesperson for the whole mob. If one person who believes in gay
    rights also believes that the egg salad sandwiches at the 7-11 are
    controlling his mind, they all do!

    Name Calling

    Please do! One important thing, though: don't actually refer to your
    opponent's argument. This just distracts from the refreshing change of
    pace found in speculating about his or her social life, sexual
    practices, and possible theoretical criminal background. Extra bonus
    hint: come up with a mocking variation on your adversary's name and use
    that in all postings.

    Proof

    Once you've reached a stalemate on an unanswerable subject (Existence of
    God, Death Star vs. Enterprise, &c.), that doesn't mean the fun has to
    end there. Oh, heavens no! Try arguing about who has the "burden of
    proof." Remember to say "Occam's Razor" a lot. Occam was a fun guy who
    loved to have his name invoked in arguments about whether daisies can
    think. He would have agreed with you.

    Winning

    This one's pretty obvious: you win when you say you win. After all,
    who's more qualified to judge the depth and wit of your reasoning than
    yourself? So make sure to keep everyone informed by reminding them in
    each post that you are winning, or more accurately that you've won and
    are just continuing the discussion because your tea isn't done yet.

    Emergency Back-Up Plan

    Sometimes things don't go right, and you may find yourself fleetingly
    doubting your ironclad arguments. When this happens, do not question
    yourself! Who knows where that could lead? Instead, if you must, stop
    arguing. However, you can't leave people with the impression that you
    were wrong, so make as much noise about not arguing as you can. Explain
    that your opponent is not worth responding to, that they are biased and
    "PC" (it doesn't matter what the argument is: "PC" is now a synonym for
    "inclined to disagree with me"😉, and that you will no longer respond to
    them, except possibly to explain a couple more times why you're not
    responding. Then pat yourself on the back for a job well done.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.