Donald Gillies said:I don't recommend powder coating. We are all just caretakers of these
bikes, which can last 50 or 100 years by themselves. Unless it's an
offroad bicycle, do you reall _need_ a powder coat? Because it will
DAMAGE the value of the bike - forcing the new owner to accept your
color choice, more or less (because a powder coat is so difficult to
remove...)
I was just thinking about that last night. I wonder how long this bike
will actually last. How many years would it take for a steel frame to
rust away to nothing?
Quoted message said:If you had a pet that would outlive you, would you amputate their
perfectly good tail? Wouldn't that possibly decrease the value to to
a new owner?
powder coats are very difficult to remove / repaint.
powder coats obscure luglines and frame workmanship.
This is my main concern. It seems that regular paint is thicker at
inside edges, and more thin at outside edges, and this is particularly
evident at the lugs. It would be a shame to make the lugwork (while
simple) seem clunky. And there is the faint text on the dropouts that I
would like to preserve.
Quoted message said:powder coats are boring. No Candies. Few Metallics. No
The bike has a warm white metallic, with a very fine grained metallic
that has a slight gold to it. Probably hard to match with paint too!
Quoted message said:Polychromatics. It's cheap because you give up a lot !!
powder coats don't really work if you're using bondo and nearly
every bicycle painter will tell you to use bondo to fill nicks,
etc., when you repaint any frame.
If you're going to get the frame blasted, you still need to strip the
chrome all by hand and/or polish it, then mask it, before taking it to
get blasted. Otherwise, the blasting will pit/ruin the chrome.
The frame has no chrome. I was considering chroming the rear triangle,
but I'm not sure if that would ruin the bike.
Joseph