This jerk disapproves of editing and deleting posts EXCEPT in certain cases!!!
So, in other words, as long as things are edited that he disapproves of it is OK with him/her!
What a hypocrite.
This jerk probably does not even know why my posts on Canadian Cyclist were removed or what they said. Time has proven me correct in almost every instance. Look at the latest CCCA Chief Operating Officer fiasco. Lacelle, the earlier non-cycling hire, failed and the CCA goes and hires another non-cyclign person to run the sport for the coutnry. She is bound to fail as well. Watch.
Member
[img]ccforums.ipbhost.compip.gifOpen ↗[/img][img]ccforums.ipbhost.compip.gifOpen ↗[/img]
Group: Members
Posts: 18
Joined: 10-November 06
Member No.: 1,957
[img]ccforums.ipbhost.comspacer.gifOpen ↗[/img]
interested to see that editoress has closed 2 sites referring to new on-line site roadie. i have no problem with that at all - makes sense when too much attention is being drawn to a potential competitor. what i do have a problem with is the editors not removing (except for the ed arzouian episodes) numerous threads that have contained inappropriate material. this would include potentially libellous statements, [censored], and what could often be regarded as personal attacks. what do the forumites think should be OK here and what exactly should be removed?