Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Opinions on Shimano 10spd 7800 rear hubs

Started by Ron Ruff · · Last activity · 15 posts · 761 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
24 December 2006
Last activity
28 December 2006
Original author
Ron Ruff
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
761
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Wondering if those that have experience with these could tell me if
    there are any significant issues with the new freehub in regard to
    durability, sealing, maintenance, etc. Thanks.

  2. Ron Ruff said:

    Wondering if those that have experience with these could tell me if
    there are any significant issues with the new freehub in regard to
    durability, sealing, maintenance, etc. Thanks.

    Seems durable, MUCH harder to overhaul, getting the 3/16 balls to sit
    nice when you put them in(loose, no cage ala Campagnolo). Races are
    pressed onto the axle, so if you toast one, new race/axle
    assembly-$50..same for the front. I think the 7700/6600/6500 are much
    better hubs, since the freehub is bolted onto the hub body. Not the
    unsupported one like the 7800 and all others out there. BUT getting
    tough to find 7700 hubs and remember, 7800 hubs are '10s' shimano
    only...

  3. Thanks for the info Peter. I saw some new 36 hiole on ebay for $70 each
    and wondered if there was a serious issue that I didn't know about.
    Sounds like they are decent at least. Heck, they are as light as a lot
    of boutique hubs. I'm not going to ride them myself (I'm still on 9spd)
    but I wanted to try a 2-1 spoking pattern (like Campy G3) and these
    should be perfect for that.

  4. Ron Ruff said:

    Thanks for the info Peter. I saw some new 36 hiole on ebay for $70 each.

    Now they are $60!

  5. Ron Ruff said:
    Ron Ruff said:

    Thanks for the info Peter. I saw some new 36 hiole on ebay for $70 each.

    Now they are $60!

    Undoubtedly the seller, listening to many MO places, are thinkin' 36h
    is hopelessly outdated and to be discontinued by manufacturers at any
    minute..wrong on both counts. Great find, even if you are gong to do a
    goofy lacing pattern.

  6. Ron Ruff said:

    Thanks for the info Peter. I saw some new 36 hiole on ebay for $70 each
    and wondered if there was a serious issue that I didn't know about.
    Sounds like they are decent at least. Heck, they are as light as a lot
    of boutique hubs. I'm not going to ride them myself (I'm still on 9spd)
    but I wanted to try a 2-1 spoking pattern (like Campy G3) and these
    should be perfect for that.


    if you're looking at radial spoking for the non-drive side, you might
    experience flange failure. check the hub and see if shimano list it as
    ok for radial spoking. for normal spoking counts, the tension ratio
    drive to non-drive for a campy hub is about 50%. for a half-count
    non-drive side, the spoke tension will be about the same both sides.
    that might exceed the flange's ability to cope in a radial configuration.

  7. jim beam said:

    if you're looking at radial spoking for the non-drive side, you might
    experience flange failure. check the hub and see if shimano list it as
    ok for radial spoking. for normal spoking counts, the tension ratio
    drive to non-drive for a campy hub is about 50%. for a half-count
    non-drive side, the spoke tension will be about the same both sides.
    that might exceed the flange's ability to cope in a radial configuration.

    I would cross them if I could... but it wasn't obvious to me how I
    could do that with an odd number of spokes, unless maybe a
    crows-foot... that is in sets of 3, yes? I'll have to look into it...

    Shimano says that the front hub is ok for radial (even with 36 holes I
    guess), but no mention on the back. I'm not really worried though...
    the flange is pretty big and I'm only using every other hole.

    Like Peter said, a 36 hole DA hub is not a big seller, since the only
    advantage it has on Ultegra is lighter weight... plus it has some
    disadvantages... and if you want a 36 spoke wheel you probably aren't
    too concerned about the weight. It's the perfect hub for doing a 2:1
    lacing though since the tension on both sides will be nealy identical.
    It seems pretty optimal for a light & strong wheel... if you want to
    use a deep rim anyway.

  8. Ron Ruff said:
    jim beam said:

    if you're looking at radial spoking for the non-drive side, you might
    experience flange failure. check the hub and see if shimano list it as
    ok for radial spoking. for normal spoking counts, the tension ratio
    drive to non-drive for a campy hub is about 50%. for a half-count
    non-drive side, the spoke tension will be about the same both sides.
    that might exceed the flange's ability to cope in a radial configuration.

    I would cross them if I could... but it wasn't obvious to me how I
    could do that with an odd number of spokes, unless maybe a
    crows-foot... that is in sets of 3, yes? I'll have to look into it...

    Shimano says that the front hub is ok for radial (even with 36 holes I
    guess), but no mention on the back. I'm not really worried though...
    the flange is pretty big and I'm only using every other hole.

    the every other hole thing will probably help, but you still have stress
    aligned with the path of least fatigue strength. see how it goes.
    maybe buy two just in case since the price is right...

    Quoted message said:


    Like Peter said, a 36 hole DA hub is not a big seller, since the only
    advantage it has on Ultegra is lighter weight...

    the bearings are slightly better and the shell is cold forged which
    makes it stronger, both static loading and fatigue. good hub.

    Quoted message said:

    plus it has some
    disadvantages... and if you want a 36 spoke wheel you probably aren't
    too concerned about the weight. It's the perfect hub for doing a 2:1
    lacing though since the tension on both sides will be nealy identical.
    It seems pretty optimal for a light & strong wheel... if you want to
    use a deep rim anyway.

  9. jim beam said:

    the every other hole thing will probably help, but you still have stress
    aligned with the path of least fatigue strength. see how it goes.

    Quoted message said:

    the bearings are slightly better and the shell is cold forged which
    makes it stronger, both static loading and fatigue. good hub.

    Like you said... should be a strong hub anyway. As I recall they used
    to advertise a thicker flange compared to the 7700 model... but maybe
    I'm mistaken. I'd put the odds at flange failure real close to zero...
    but I can do a crows foot on that side if it seems warranted.

    Quoted message said:

    maybe buy two just in case since the price is right...

    I bought 10! Part of a little wheel building project... planning to
    build them up and sell them. I don't aim to make money... just doing it
    for the experience.

    BTW, where does one get boxes and packing materials to ship wheels?
    I've been checking generic boxes online, and the smallest box I could
    fit 2 wheels in costs 3 times as much to ship to me as the boxes cost!
    It's just over the limit where they have to go freight vs UPS. There is
    no place locally to get the right size. But I'm thinking there must be
    places that sell boxes and dividers that are already made for wheels.
    Peter... would you mind me asking where you get yours... or do you make
    them yourself?

  10. Ron Ruff said:
    jim beam said:

    the every other hole thing will probably help, but you still have stress
    aligned with the path of least fatigue strength. see how it goes.

    Quoted message said:

    the bearings are slightly better and the shell is cold forged which
    makes it stronger, both static loading and fatigue. good hub.

    Like you said... should be a strong hub anyway. As I recall they used
    to advertise a thicker flange compared to the 7700 model... but maybe
    I'm mistaken. I'd put the odds at flange failure real close to zero...
    but I can do a crows foot on that side if it seems warranted.

    Quoted message said:

    maybe buy two just in case since the price is right...

    I bought 10! Part of a little wheel building project... planning to
    build them up and sell them. I don't aim to make money... just doing it
    for the experience.

    BTW, where does one get boxes and packing materials to ship wheels?
    I've been checking generic boxes online, and the smallest box I could
    fit 2 wheels in costs 3 times as much to ship to me as the boxes cost!
    It's just over the limit where they have to go freight vs UPS. There is
    no place locally to get the right size. But I'm thinking there must be
    places that sell boxes and dividers that are already made for wheels.
    Peter... would you mind me asking where you get yours... or do you make
    them yourself?

    A biie shop that deals in wheels should have them. Or we use a frame
    box, fits 2 wheels really well.

    WE warranty more than a few using a frame box, then get wheel boxes
    with the warranty retirn. Or some shop that deals with Kry-4-me-syriums.

  11. Ron Ruff wrote:
    ---snip---
    I'm not going to ride them myself (I'm still on 9spd)

    Quoted message said:

    but I wanted to try a 2-1 spoking pattern (like Campy G3) and these
    should be perfect for that.


    ---/snip---

    Ron,
    Are you thinking about skipping holes on your rim, or matching
    used spokes to rim hole count. If the latter, you're pretty much stuck
    with a 32 hole hub (16 DS 8 NDS). If the former, well, I guess it
    doesn't matter.

    SYJ

  12. SYJ said:

    Ron,
    Are you thinking about skipping holes on your rim, or matching
    used spokes to rim hole count. If the latter, you're pretty much stuck
    with a 32 hole hub (16 DS 8 NDS). If the former, well, I guess it
    doesn't matter.

    Not quite sure what you are asking. It is a 36 hole hub, and I plan to
    use all 18 holes on the DS and 9 radial (hopefully) on the NDS. I'll
    use a 36 hole rim, skipping every 3rd hole... so the rear will have 27
    spokes. Even if I used a 32 hole hub and 16:8 I'd still use a 32 hole
    rim and skip every third hole. Rims are drill with holes canted towards
    alternating sides, so I don't think it would be a good idea to do it
    any other way.

    Here is one person who did it a little differently... but I don't agree
    with his approach.
    http://wellspokenwheels.com/wsw5.htm
    For one thing he used a 24 hole rim and a 32 hole hub, so unless he had
    the rims custom drilled, some of the holes in the rim aren't lined up
    properly. Plus he used a narrow spaced AC hub which has close to
    balanced tension with *normal* lacing. He says that removing half the
    spokes from the ND side balances the tension but I don't see how that
    could be true. The Dura Ace hub has wide spacing, so if I lace radial
    heads in on the NDS, and 3x on the DS the tension is nearly identical
    with 2:1 spoking.

  13. Ron Ruff said:
    SYJ said:

    Ron,
    Are you thinking about skipping holes on your rim, or matching
    used spokes to rim hole count. If the latter, you're pretty much stuck
    with a 32 hole hub (16 DS 8 NDS). If the former, well, I guess it
    doesn't matter.

    Not quite sure what you are asking. It is a 36 hole hub, and I plan to
    use all 18 holes on the DS and 9 radial (hopefully) on the NDS. I'll
    use a 36 hole rim, skipping every 3rd hole... so the rear will have 27
    spokes. Even if I used a 32 hole hub and 16:8 I'd still use a 32 hole
    rim and skip every third hole. Rims are drill with holes canted towards
    alternating sides, so I don't think it would be a good idea to do it
    any other way.

    Ron,
    I kinda figured out what you intended to do (skipping holes on the rim)
    as I was writing my post, but for some stupid reason, I posted anyway.
    I've thought about a similar project, but was going to follow the
    'wellspoken' path - 32 hole hub, 24 hole rim. One of these days...

    SYJ

  14. SYJ said:

    I've thought about a similar project, but was going to follow the
    'wellspoken' path - 32 hole hub, 24 hole rim. One of these days...

    Are you concerned about the way the holes are drilled in the rim... or
    do you plan to "fix" it somehow?

    I guess some people might think it looks "funny" to have unused holes
    in the rim, but if the rim doesn't have eyelets I think it will be
    barely noticable.

  15. Ron Ruff said:
    SYJ said:

    I've thought about a similar project, but was going to follow the
    'wellspoken' path - 32 hole hub, 24 hole rim. One of these days...

    Are you concerned about the way the holes are drilled in the rim... or
    do you plan to "fix" it somehow?

    I guess some people might think it looks "funny" to have unused holes
    in the rim, but if the rim doesn't have eyelets I think it will be
    barely noticable.

    Purely for aesthetic reasons. I'm silly that way.

    SYJ

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.