UK and Europe · Public discussion

Helmet petition

Started by Danny Colyer · · Last activity · 4 posts · 385 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
29 November 2006
Last activity
30 November 2006
Original author
Danny Colyer
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
385
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Following the mention a few days ago of theyworkforyou.com, I subscribed
    to a few keywords and I've just received an e-mail informing me of a
    petition presented to the Commons calling for mandatory helmets for
    children.

    <url:http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2006-11-28a.1050.1&s=cycle#g1050.2>

    <quote>
    Peter Bone (Wellingborough, Conservative)

    I wish to present to the House of Commons a public petition from the
    people of Wellingborough and surrounding areas. The Wellingborough and
    Rushden Herald and Post, the excellent weekly newspaper for
    Wellingborough and Rushden, always stands up for the local community and
    campaigns on important issues. It has recently been highlighting the
    number of children injured while riding their bikes. The petition has
    developed out of that outstanding campaign.

    The petition declares:

    Although the Highway Code states that under the rules for cyclists 'you
    should wear a cycling helmet which conforms to current regulations', it
    is not compulsory. Last year 5691 children were injured whilst cycling.
    Of these 28 were killed.

    The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons charges the
    Secretary of State for Transport to bring in proposals to make it
    compulsory for children to wear a cycle helmet when riding their bikes.
    </quote>

    Any Wellingborough cyclists fancy writing to their MP?

    I notice that they fail to mention what proportion of the injuries and
    deaths might have been prevented by helmets, knowledge of which to me
    seems essential in order for the figures to have any relevance to the
    debate.

    --
    Danny Colyer <URL:http://www.colyer.plus.com/danny/>
    Reply address is valid, but that on my website is checked more often
    "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." - Thomas Paine

  2. Danny Colyer wrote on 29/11/2006 19:35 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    Following the mention a few days ago of theyworkforyou.com, I
    subscribed to a few keywords and I've just received an e-mail
    informing me of a petition presented to the Commons calling for
    mandatory helmets for children.

    <url:http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2006-11-28a.1050.1&s=cycle#g1050.2>

    <quote> Peter Bone (Wellingborough, Conservative)

    I wish to present to the House of Commons a public petition from the
    people of Wellingborough and surrounding areas. The Wellingborough
    and Rushden Herald and Post, the excellent weekly newspaper for
    Wellingborough and Rushden, always stands up for the local community
    and campaigns on important issues. It has recently been highlighting
    the number of children injured while riding their bikes. The petition
    has developed out of that outstanding campaign.

    The petition declares:

    Although the Highway Code states that under the rules for cyclists
    'you should wear a cycling helmet which conforms to current
    regulations', it is not compulsory. Last year 5691 children were
    injured whilst cycling. Of these 28 were killed.

    The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons charges
    the Secretary of State for Transport to bring in proposals to make it
    compulsory for children to wear a cycle helmet when riding their
    bikes. </quote>

    Any Wellingborough cyclists fancy writing to their MP?

    I notice that they fail to mention what proportion of the injuries
    and deaths might have been prevented by helmets, knowledge of which
    to me seems essential in order for the figures to have any relevance
    to the debate.

    How about getting a petition going for child pedestrians?. The numbers
    are much greater.

    --
    Tony

    "...has many omissions and contains much that is apocryphal, or at least
    wildly inaccurate..."
    Douglas Adams; The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

  3. I wonder if it was this one
    http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?p4hpet&1

    That's got some serious endorsements among its massive 35 signatures...
    Darth Vader, Keanu Reeves, Toad of Toad Hall, Charles Darwin, U Bin
    Laden, Lance Armstrong, Bill Clinton, Wile E Coyote, Fat Eric and 3
    different M. Mouses

  4. POHB said:

    That's got some serious endorsements among its massive 35 signatures...
    Darth Vader, Keanu Reeves, Toad of Toad Hall, Charles Darwin, U Bin
    Laden, Lance Armstrong, Bill Clinton, Wile E Coyote, Fat Eric and 3
    different M. Mouses

    I particularly liked Bill Clinton's comment:

    "Hell, yeah. I used to believe the rational arguments set out at
    www.cyclehelmets.org but your biased and irrational viewpoint has convinced
    me to ignore twenty years of evidence. Sign me up for this shallow and
    meaningless petition!"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.