UK and Europe · Public discussion

BMA Decision Explained!

Started by Tony Raven · · Last activity · 5 posts · 604 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
4 November 2006
Last activity
6 November 2006
Original author
Tony Raven
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
604
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Is this the reason the BMA and many A&E staff say what they do about
    cycle helmets?

    "There is evidence that hospitals have difficulties distinguishing pedal
    and motor cycles, and the TARN data do not show pedal cyclists as a
    separate group. In Ward et al.’s (2005) London study, one of the
    hospitals was unable to distinguish pedal cycles and motorcycles and
    ended up by miscoding both."
    p51 of
    http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_rdsafety/documents/page/dft_rdsafety_611755.pdf
    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  2. Tony Raven said:

    Is this the reason the BMA and many A&E staff say what they do about
    cycle helmets?

    I believe the majority that passed that motion at the bma reps meeting
    were absolutely ignorant of the facts, not interested, fat car addicts
    , thought they were rubber stamping a' good thing'.
    Clearly many of them think their head is like a water melon and that's
    as much as they can cope with.
    These figures are quite beyond them.
    They are not all of the doctors, just a proportion of those that prefer
    committee meetings to riding their bikes.

    TerryJ

  3. Quoted message said:


    Clearly many of them think their head is like a water melon and that's
    as much as they can cope with.

    I wish that idiot was local - opportunity for local press stirring -
    "Dr xyz's approach to patient care - if it works on melons, it's good
    enough for my patients".

    Even that presupposes that strapping a helmet to the melon in
    question would have made a blind bit of difference. I had a spare
    melon recently and thought about trying it on camera, but couldn't
    find a helmet I didn't want to keep.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

  4. Ian Smith wrote on 06/11/2006 12:19 +0100:

    Quoted message said:


    I wish that idiot was local - opportunity for local press stirring -
    "Dr xyz's approach to patient care - if it works on melons, it's good
    enough for my patients".

    My current line is "BHIT: does what it says on the tin. Cyclists
    following the advice of BHIT, who are campaigning for mandatory cycle
    helmets, are more likely to Be Hit according to research by the
    University of Bath"

    --
    Tony

    "Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using
    his intelligence; he is just using his memory."
    - Leonardo da Vinci

  5. "Tony Raven" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Ian Smith wrote on 06/11/2006 12:19 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    My current line is "BHIT: does what it says on the tin. Cyclists
    following the advice of BHIT, who are campaigning for mandatory cycle
    helmets, are more likely to Be Hit according to research by the University
    of Bath"

    Love it! :-)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.