Luke said:This winter I'm commuting on a bike equipped with a (Winwood) CF forks.
Lately this phobia has been bubbling up from my subconcious: subzero
riding (down to -20 C) could embrittle and weaken the 'plastic' forks.
I have premonitions of asphalt face-plants. Admittedly it's a
completely unqualified anxiety, but I need reassurance. Are CF
components more vulnerable to temperature fluctations than Al or CroMo?
This is a very good question and with the exception of the one reply
about steels, nobody has given you any useful information.
In fact, composites become stronger as they get colder. The toughness
may or may not reduce, but not by much. Toughness can even increase,
depending on the resin used.
The plastic resin (which is what the composite mostly is) is brittle at
room temperature. It only becomes somewhat soft at a temperature
approaching its decomposition temperagture, but because it is fully
"cross-linked" it is still brittle at high temperatures, too.
Basically, outside of residual stress effects, cold is not a problem
for composites.
Residual stress:
When you cure a composite at an elevated temperature, the reinforcement
will be a different size than at room temperature. As the part cures,
the shrinkage of the resin and the fibers are different. These residual
stresses are significant and can be a problem in a poorly designed
part. However, take a 250 degree cure resin system as an example. The
change in stress from 70 degrees to zero is a small fraction of the
change from 250 to 70. Carbon Fiber is especially vexing from a
residual stress standpoint, as the fibers actuall shrink lengthwise
while expanding through their thickness, with increasing temperature.
An unbalanced laminate cured at an elevated temperature will actually
warp markedly on cooling, due to the lengthening of the carbon fibres.
Now, what happens with the residual stresses is the cration of
microcracks in the resin matrix and or separation of the resin from the
fibres. Depending on the nature of this cracking, the damage may be
stable or unstable from a structural standpoint. A few years ago this
was a hot area of research. I haven't checked in 5 years so maybe it is
all figured out (I doubt it).
On the topic of Aluminum Embrittlement:
In fact Aluminum does not embrittle with colder temperatures. Rather,
it gets tougher. Aluminum has a Face Centered Cubic crystal structure,
as des Austenitic stainless steel (example: 316, 304, 18-8, 17-7 PH),
These materials, due to the crystal structure, are the best choice for
cryogenic applications. (400 series stainless is known as ferritic and
has a BCC structure--see below). Any vehicle which carries a chilled
liquid--LPG, LNG (the latter is verrrrry cold) Nitrogen, LOX, Helium,
will be made of either Aluminum or Austenitic Stainless.
On the other hand, the Body Centered Cubic (BCC) crystal structure is
sensitive to cold. This is the crystal structure of most steel (alloy
and carbon steels). There is a Ductile to Brittle Transition
temperature (DBTT) which is a temperature range over which the
toughness (measured in energy) will reduce by a factor of 10 or more!
All BCC steels have this trait, though the temperature at which it
occurs is dependent on the microstructure. Higher carbon content
increases this markedly, and so axles etc are more likely to fail due
to shock at low temps.
Titanium, which has a Hexagonal Close Packed (HCP) structure is also
sensitive to the DBTT phenomenon in the same way as steel. Both HCP and
BCC structures show this trait. Anecdotally, early Campagnolo Super
Record titanium crank spindles failed in winter training. This happened
to someone I knew back in 1980 or thereabouts.